567
posted ago by axolotl_peyotl ago by axolotl_peyotl +579 / -12

The COVID conspiracy is undoubtedly one of the worst crimes against humanity of our time. Here are some links to help start unraveling this unfathomably cruel chapter in history...please add any more you can find!

Note: There is no unifying theory being presented here, other than the sense that there's overwhelming evidence we've been systematically lied to about COVID from the start.

Comments (204)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Xaviermgk 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are trying to make all "empirical" evidence out to be "fake" evidence".

In my local Facebook group, a woman shared her negative reactions to vaccines in the past. She wasn't the brightest woman, but man she had an excellent memory.

Multiple people started haranguing her, and I stepped in. Turns out that one dude who really was awful to her was a Ph.D researcher in chimeric proteins...and he literally devolved into straight shilling techniques after a while. It was something to behold.

I made a HUGE post about it.

Later that same week, someone posted a poll in the group about whether you were going to get the vaccine or not. The only choices were yes and no, and it was good to see that less than 40% of the people were going to get it.

The crazy thing is that the researcher worked or works for Cedars-Sinai in LA, a pretty big hospital, and it's my sister's hospital...even think one of my nieces was born there, and I'm on the East Coast. I think he's collaborated with JHU so that tells you something (cough cough Bloomberg).

I really poked holes in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, and man he got sore. It was great to see. But it tells you something when a Ph.D. has to stoop to trying to downplay or even dismiss empirical evidence on a local Facebook group, using nothing more than mockery and insulting people's intelligence.

1
NotAPengali 1 point ago +2 / -1

They are trying to make all "empirical" evidence out to be "fake" evidence".

Seems that way.

it was good to see that less than 40% of the people were going to get it.

Still way too many, I’d say.

really poked holes in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, and man he got sore. It was great to see.

Glad to hear it. Seriously. Fuck these sheep.

it tells you something when a Ph.D. has to stoop to trying to downplay or even dismiss empirical evidence on a local Facebook group, using nothing more than mockery and insulting people's intelligence.

Yeah. It really lets you know how deep is the deceit. It sounds like he may very well have actually even believed the tripe he was spewing.

I’m glad I wasn’t witness to that dialogue. It would have likely made my eyes roll and blood boil.

3
Xaviermgk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think he believed what he said.

He outright lied multiple times. For example, don't know if you saw the one stat from the Moderna study where a whopping 21% of people had an adverse reaction given a "larger dose".

He said the stat was a lie, directly, then linked to the paper itself which prominently had the 21% statistic.

Then he told me it was "my job" to prove what size dose they were using, before they even announced anything like that.

And the really crazy part is that in that study, the 21% adverse reaction rate was with ONLY healthy individuals aged 18-45...it's like, what are you going to expect in compromised individuals?

Me pointing that out made him REALLY livid, because it's really an unassailable point.

1
NotAPengali 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think he believed what he said.

I don’t know what’s worse - someone who knows they’re lying and are doing it to be deceitful, or someone who’s not aware that they’re as lost and ignorant as they are but are spewing b.s. anyway as if they know what they're talking about.

He said the stat was a lie, directly, then linked to the paper itself which prominently had the 21% statistic.

Yeah - so he’s either being purposefully deceitful, or he’s literally THAT dumb.

Me pointing that out made him REALLY livid, because it's really an unassailable point.

Very glad you did that.

Keep fighting the good fight, sir.

3
Xaviermgk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks man.

They banned me from the group eventually LOL. Buncha nazis. One of the mods said I "practiced pseudoscience" and didn't have peer reviewed papers, when I do have peer reviewed papers AND wtf is "practicing pseudoscience"? Either something works or it doesn't. I could sell homeopathic remedies or some shit, but wow these people are out of touch with reality. I've even done research at NIST.

I could literally sue multiple people in that group for defamation, but I figure most of them are train wrecks anyhow.

Here's a crazy shower thought...imagine one day if science was actually science again.

That's actually really difficult to wrap one's mind around...