Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

25
SHOEGATE TIMELINE - Pink --> Blue --> Pink (i.redd.it)
posted 4 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 4 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +27 / -2
16 comments share
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– GaIIowBoob 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Matching shoes were too uncomfortable, she changed for the reshots

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Reaction_freckle -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

It’s all about fear of tripping and falling. She switched out the shoes based on how much walking and if there were stairs involved. This whole day is planned out by the minute. She has someone who advises on things like that. The worst possible thing that could happen to a First Lady is to trip and fall in front of the entire nation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– worldowedexplanation 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

But those shoes look the same except for color, the heel height looks the same. I’m a woman and I’ve changed shoes in the middle of a work day, but she didn’t switch to flats or more comfy shoes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– bydesign 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Spot on! If I were changing shoes for reasons of comfort or stairs/distance, I sure wouldn't be going from a high heel to another high heel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Reaction_freckle -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

true. I was thinking maybe she just felt more comfortable walking up steps in one pair vs the other. Like maybe the heel had a wider base. I don't know anything about heels though lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– axolotl_peyotl [S] 4 points 4 years ago +8 / -4

I'll admit that this one anomaly by itself isn't a smoking gun, but taken in context with ALL the rest of the inauguration high fuckery, this is a particularly damning bit of evidence.

Interesting to see the shills on 4chan and reddit arguing how normal it is for women to change their heels twice in one event.

I think it's pretty clear parts of the inauguration were pre-recorded or deep faked.

The question remains, why the obvious shoe color oversight? Was it meant to be noticed? Or was it indeed simply an oversight, and they're expecting people to be too apathetic to care.

This whole thing is one of the strangest events I've ever witnessed in my life.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– axolotl_peyotl [S] 2 points 4 years ago +6 / -4

Seems she goes back to pink at the end though?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1
▲ -2 ▼
– Clobro -2 points 4 years ago +1 / -3

While I do side with AXO so much hocus pocus random oddities going on with this innuaguration... The shoes can simply be explained by.. They weren't comfortable etc?.. simplest explanation imo

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– axolotl_peyotl [S] 2 points 4 years ago +5 / -3

Look at the image...why did she switch back?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GaIIowBoob 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

They didn't use the reshoots exclusively, only for some scenes

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– heebiejeebie 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

c'mon man.... most of king sniffy's bootlickers don't care.... nor are they bright enough to notice.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vicarivs 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

What’s more likely, that the entire inauguration was a hoax which required the cooperation of many different people and organizations in order to pull off or that Jill Xiden changed shoes at some point?

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy