Could be wrong but from reading that I didn't get the impression that he necessarily thinks we're ruled by Muslims but that their version of history is the one pushed as the truth even though it isn't which could come about in numerous ways like most fake history. As it's an anti-white and anti-Christian version of history that's pushed by making the muslims the victims it would seem that a lot of potential groups would benefit from pushing the narrative.
That interpretation I find fair enough, it’s just he called them the victors (as in history is written by the victors) of some imaginary takeover of europe/the West so I think there’s some daylight between you two
I never suggested anything of the sort. Why are you creating a strawman? Do you think I am so stupid it will work or are you so stupid you think it will work? Either way it is incredibly insulting. You do not post trying to have an honest discussion and use logical fallacies.
That’s how I read it, mainly because of this part:
But college will tell you it was a peaceful time and the islam invadors let the europeans live their lives, which wasn't further from the truth. You had to submit by either converting or paying them a tax. Or you know you die.
That is a reset because the victors(islam) have rewritten history and brainwash children everyday. That is why the crusades are regarded as a horrible thing, when they were literally a response to an islamic invasion
Just wanted to say I've come to the same conclusion about the Islamic "Golden Age". They rose because of captured talent and stolen intellectual property.
It explains why they eventually stagnated after their expansion ceased and haven't contributed anything meaningful after that period.
no it isn't, dark ages was first coined in the 14th century because there was a distinct lack of literature. It was then used to describe the period of 500 to 1400 because of the perceived lack of culture and academia.
This is all because Islam invaded europe and by the 700s had established a foothold. Despite what they try to brain wash people in college with this, there was no "golden age" of islam. They did not make any scientific advancements. They stole the work of romans, indians, and many other cultures and then claimed them as their own. We know this now because we have found algebra is not islam and was stolen straight from the indian culture. This is further evident by the fact that islam blocked all attempts to expand human knowledge and understanding and only allowed math and science to be used to prove allah.
Europe's dark age was started by the sacking of rome, the burning of the library of alexandria, and essential supplies like paper being cut off by islamic invaders. It was then kept dark for hundreds of years as most of europe was kept under islamic law. But college will tell you it was a peaceful time and the islam invadors let the europeans live their lives, which wasn't further from the truth. You had to submit by either converting or paying them a tax. Or you know you die.
That is a reset because the victors(islam) have rewritten history and brainwash children everyday. That is why the crusades are regarded as a horrible thing, when they were literally a response to an islamic invasion and just an attempt to retake the land they had settled for thousands of years and ended with them just living on the coast of europe essentially.
Another point about this is look at where the Caucus mountains are. What is now considered the middle east. It is now considered arab. yet this region was historically Caucasian. Why is it that the region where white people supposedly come from doesn't contain white poeple any more? Because the arabs invaded and pushed everyone to the west side of europe which was originally inhabited by scandinavians aka barbarians.
The name Dark Ages was due to the fact that until recently very little was known of that epoch.
Are you seriously suggesting the modern world is run by muslims? My guy...lol
Could be wrong but from reading that I didn't get the impression that he necessarily thinks we're ruled by Muslims but that their version of history is the one pushed as the truth even though it isn't which could come about in numerous ways like most fake history. As it's an anti-white and anti-Christian version of history that's pushed by making the muslims the victims it would seem that a lot of potential groups would benefit from pushing the narrative.
That interpretation I find fair enough, it’s just he called them the victors (as in history is written by the victors) of some imaginary takeover of europe/the West so I think there’s some daylight between you two
I never suggested anything of the sort. Why are you creating a strawman? Do you think I am so stupid it will work or are you so stupid you think it will work? Either way it is incredibly insulting. You do not post trying to have an honest discussion and use logical fallacies.
That’s how I read it, mainly because of this part:
Just wanted to say I've come to the same conclusion about the Islamic "Golden Age". They rose because of captured talent and stolen intellectual property.
It explains why they eventually stagnated after their expansion ceased and haven't contributed anything meaningful after that period.
No, that's the myth propagated by atheists. Actually almost everything you wrote never happened.
It is literally historical record. I bet you are just a muslim who is offended because your racist religion is being put on blast.
It's not. Can you cite a single historian that supports your myth?
no it isn't, dark ages was first coined in the 14th century because there was a distinct lack of literature. It was then used to describe the period of 500 to 1400 because of the perceived lack of culture and academia.
This is all because Islam invaded europe and by the 700s had established a foothold. Despite what they try to brain wash people in college with this, there was no "golden age" of islam. They did not make any scientific advancements. They stole the work of romans, indians, and many other cultures and then claimed them as their own. We know this now because we have found algebra is not islam and was stolen straight from the indian culture. This is further evident by the fact that islam blocked all attempts to expand human knowledge and understanding and only allowed math and science to be used to prove allah.
Europe's dark age was started by the sacking of rome, the burning of the library of alexandria, and essential supplies like paper being cut off by islamic invaders. It was then kept dark for hundreds of years as most of europe was kept under islamic law. But college will tell you it was a peaceful time and the islam invadors let the europeans live their lives, which wasn't further from the truth. You had to submit by either converting or paying them a tax. Or you know you die.
That is a reset because the victors(islam) have rewritten history and brainwash children everyday. That is why the crusades are regarded as a horrible thing, when they were literally a response to an islamic invasion and just an attempt to retake the land they had settled for thousands of years and ended with them just living on the coast of europe essentially.
Another point about this is look at where the Caucus mountains are. What is now considered the middle east. It is now considered arab. yet this region was historically Caucasian. Why is it that the region where white people supposedly come from doesn't contain white poeple any more? Because the arabs invaded and pushed everyone to the west side of europe which was originally inhabited by scandinavians aka barbarians.