Could be wrong but from reading that I didn't get the impression that he necessarily thinks we're ruled by Muslims but that their version of history is the one pushed as the truth even though it isn't which could come about in numerous ways like most fake history. As it's an anti-white and anti-Christian version of history that's pushed by making the muslims the victims it would seem that a lot of potential groups would benefit from pushing the narrative.
That interpretation I find fair enough, it’s just he called them the victors (as in history is written by the victors) of some imaginary takeover of europe/the West so I think there’s some daylight between you two
I see how it could be interpreted that way, can't say I've ever seen someone advocate for a secret society of muslims ruling the world but it'd probably be an interesting read if that is what he meant. Though I doubt there's much if any information to support such a conspiracy.
Could be wrong but from reading that I didn't get the impression that he necessarily thinks we're ruled by Muslims but that their version of history is the one pushed as the truth even though it isn't which could come about in numerous ways like most fake history. As it's an anti-white and anti-Christian version of history that's pushed by making the muslims the victims it would seem that a lot of potential groups would benefit from pushing the narrative.
That interpretation I find fair enough, it’s just he called them the victors (as in history is written by the victors) of some imaginary takeover of europe/the West so I think there’s some daylight between you two
I see how it could be interpreted that way, can't say I've ever seen someone advocate for a secret society of muslims ruling the world but it'd probably be an interesting read if that is what he meant. Though I doubt there's much if any information to support such a conspiracy.