i do not believe we are always in motion

If one is within motion, while upholding an affixed assumption (belief) then ones comprehension doesn't adhere to motion, but to the affixed belief. To believe (anything) represents the self restriction (since belief requires consent by free will of choice) of comprehension within motion.

i believe we are always creating moments in time

The so called past represents the self inflected trauma of perceived loss, the so called future represents the self imposed trauma of hope and fear, and together they create the so called present, which represents the self imposed trauma of stress.

Notice how our favorite parasite merchants are offering us endless supply for loss (history, nostalgia, planned obsolesce), hope (religion, gambling), fear (msm, terrorism), and stress (clocks, timetables, calendars, events, jobs, money, nonstop fiction etc.). Notice also who's manipulating our calendars, who's putting clocks everywhere, who's benefiting from all the stress?

After all that...why are all other lifeforms in total adherence with the "skyclock" without having all that stress. Go outside and watch a squirrel, while thinking about your loss, hope, fear, and stresses. Notice how you and that squirrel are coexisting within the same habitat, yet only you are tormenting yourself with fictitious "beliefs", which makes you the threat to the squirrel?

discern what happened in that moment in time.

For what purpose? Self discernment. And for what does one require self discernment? For adherence to self sustenance. Now how exactly does his-story aka the lie agreed upon by those few who control all others, helps one to gain self discernment, when the majority of ones are nothing but white noise in the history books?

Sounds like a distraction by design...

So the past isn't fluid, the future is fluid but once that moment in time has occurred then that moment in time is no longer fluid or in motion, that moment in time is stationary.

Yet past moves (motion) towards future; as proven by present...which is also constantly changing. What if your real past is the accumulation of all that was done to allow you to exist, the present your potential of what you choose to make out of it, and the real future the consequences of the actions you set into motion?

What if history is your bloodline? That which sustains the motion from inception to death.

So when you use the word always in motion i think that is not good for the search for truth.

Not just not good; it's impossible, because motion applied to truth disproves truth as an assumption; therefore a lie.

What if the only thing that cannot change within motion are the rules that define how motion operates, which one can only comprehend mentally, while being physically only able to sense the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to make assumptions about, while using comprehension to build assumptions on the fundamental rules (the laws of nature).

Wouldn't the consciousness, be the perfect tool to handle that...perception (input) choice based comprehension (processing); action (output)?

How is it that we can only mentally comprehend our inception and death, while being physically alive? It's as if mental and physical are in balance with each other...did you now that motion create momentum (balance within motion)?