Conspiracy is the search for truth, truth does not care about your political affiliation, your wants or needs or your nation of origin, truth is global, truth can be tested for its authenticity, truth can come from anywhere as well,you be Russian or Chinese or Indian or Nigerian even American, either what they say is the truth and verifiable or it is isnt. Enjoy your Ride, it is a tough and treacherous road. It takes a lot of courage to find the truth, it tests your own beliefs and what youve been told. Good luck, that was your introduction course. Also shout out to u/axolotl_peyotl we are in good company.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
In a society that demands everyone live a lie it is a dissident act to live the truth. Paraphrased from Vaclav Havel
Never heard that one before. Thanks for sharing.
I can across this video but I don't know which site I was on Anyway (https://youtu.be/2Dk9J4trZaI)
The only thing that cannot change in a system based on constant change (motion) are the rules that define how motion operates.
Is all existence defined as being within motion? If yes...there cannot be a state of truth or false within motion. If no...tell my something in all of existence that isn't in motion?
All existence is not defined as being in motion? That is a false premise, all existence is defined as being in the present. Is the present currently in motion? i dont think so, the present is a moment in time. So at this very moment our presence is not in motion, it is definable, it is true, it happened, so for you say truth is always in motion is a false premise. Truth is stationary, truth is solid, truth have evidence, you are trying to define a truth as being fluid,always changing, that is not how truth works.
Doesn't your "time" tell you with every second that the "present" is in constant motion? Isn't the past always gone, and the future always out of reach? Aren't you breathing nonstop until you're death; thereby constantly adapting to motion?
I think our disagreement is on the word motion, i do not believe we are always in motion, i believe we are always creating moments in time that can be verified and disseminated into pieces. These pieces of time is how we can establish truth or discern what happened in that moment in time.
So the past isnt fluid, the future is fluid but once that moment in time has occurred then that moment in time is no longer fluid or in motion, that moment in time is stationary.
So when you use the word always in motion i think that is not good for the search for truth. A single moment in history is not still in motion, so the truth is not fluid, the truth is stationary.
i do not believe we are always in motion
If one is within motion, while upholding an affixed assumption (belief) then ones comprehension doesn't adhere to motion, but to the affixed belief. To believe (anything) represents the self restriction (since belief requires consent by free will of choice) of comprehension within motion.
i believe we are always creating moments in time
The so called past represents the self inflected trauma of perceived loss, the so called future represents the self imposed trauma of hope and fear, and together they create the so called present, which represents the self imposed trauma of stress.
Notice how our favorite parasite merchants are offering us endless supply for loss (history, nostalgia, planned obsolesce), hope (religion, gambling), fear (msm, terrorism), and stress (clocks, timetables, calendars, events, jobs, money, nonstop fiction etc.). Notice also who's manipulating our calendars, who's putting clocks everywhere, who's benefiting from all the stress?
After all that...why are all other lifeforms in total adherence with the "skyclock" without having all that stress. Go outside and watch a squirrel, while thinking about your loss, hope, fear, and stresses. Notice how you and that squirrel are coexisting within the same habitat, yet only you are tormenting yourself with fictitious "beliefs", which makes you the threat to the squirrel?
discern what happened in that moment in time.
For what purpose? Self discernment. And for what does one require self discernment? For adherence to self sustenance. Now how exactly does his-story aka the lie agreed upon by those few who control all others, helps one to gain self discernment, when the majority of ones are nothing but white noise in the history books?
Sounds like a distraction by design...
So the past isn't fluid, the future is fluid but once that moment in time has occurred then that moment in time is no longer fluid or in motion, that moment in time is stationary.
Yet past moves (motion) towards future; as proven by present...which is also constantly changing. What if your real past is the accumulation of all that was done to allow you to exist, the present your potential of what you choose to make out of it, and the real future the consequences of the actions you set into motion?
What if history is your bloodline? That which sustains the motion from inception to death.
So when you use the word always in motion i think that is not good for the search for truth.
Not just not good; it's impossible, because motion applied to truth disproves truth as an assumption; therefore a lie.
What if the only thing that cannot change within motion are the rules that define how motion operates, which one can only comprehend mentally, while being physically only able to sense the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to make assumptions about, while using comprehension to build assumptions on the fundamental rules (the laws of nature).
Wouldn't the consciousness, be the perfect tool to handle that...perception (input) choice based comprehension (processing); action (output)?
How is it that we can only mentally comprehend our inception and death, while being physically alive? It's as if mental and physical are in balance with each other...did you now that motion create momentum (balance within motion)?
Let me clear my response a little bette, I don’t believe history is in motion, I believe history is fixed in that fixed history we can discern truth./
Yet the history books have a copyright in them; that gives ownership over definition of history to those who tell it. How exactly does self discernment jive with being owned by others?
Notice also that the history they tell you is never about you, but they get you to pay them to educate the history of others into you, upon which you then define yourself by...doesn't that sound like a crooked deal?
What about historical revision (the bible alone has like over 100k open changes made), or nondisclosure agreements upon history, a stranglehold of the military industrial complex upon everything below their position, usury based private funding, profit based research, backstabbing within a chain of command about positions to educate from, political agendas pushed to destroy cultural heritage, while ignoring any historical ground-rules and so on?
Now consider the following...after a schoolyard soccer game, ask the goalie, the one that made the goal and the audience watching, about how how the game went down and they will always tell you a different story; because they each comprehend what they perceive in accordance to their own perspective. ONE within ALL views through the lens of ONEself.
Also, there's a psychological little game called telephone; Chinese whispers; Stille Post, where you whisper information in to the ear of the first person within a group, and then let them pass it by whispering to each other, until the last person will announce the information received to the collective. This little test has a 99% inaccuracy rate. Information passed by free will of choice will always be transmuted, because choice represents a 50/50 chance of either adherence to or ignorance of information input.
The only thing that is fixed in history is indeed ones own belief, but only if one ignores that ones life already defines ones death...ergo one needs to ignore motion to believe, and that is exactly what other (((ones))) are ruthlessly exploiting to the detriment of all.