I’m sure you can instantly see what the purpose would be of releasing a virus in DC today. If truly deadly, they could rid themselves of nagging patriots. Even if just the flu, it will amplify the Covid narrative.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
This will definitely be the headline even if not a single person is sick. Same as they did for Sturgis, though nobody got sick and died from that.
Not when the Antifa Soldiers start fighting against the Trumpets to instigate the beginning of the Marxist Revolution of the US.
Like they would care about antifa lives?
Maybe. Bear in mind that it would then spread throughout the nation, so it kind of defeats the point of just getting rid of the "nagging patriots."
For that matter, it's also the "nagging patriots" that tend to avoid COVID restrictions in the first place, so I don't really see why you would even need to use a super-spreader event to do such.
For optics.
Yea, that was why I made it clear that it was pure speculation. What I might contemplate with their motives, goals, and power.
So entertain my spitballing. Humor me. This isn’t an assertion. Just a possibility being noted
Sure, every person they wanted could get vaccinated against it. Or it could have some sort of fast acting mechanism of action, where it is highly infectious on an initial release but it isn’t really transmissible from person to person.
Or, like I said, it could be something mild that they heavily exaggerate, like coronavirus or the flu.
Or they could just call it a superspreader without a single person getting sick.
And yes, I do think virtually every politician and other important scumbag is in on “it”, generally, as it were. Concerns might be raised over efficacy our outcome but ethics are not their wheelhouse.