I am sorry that you misunderstood me but if you’re just going to downvote and poop your pants instead of just talking this out then you’re clearly only looking for information you want to hear.
Look I get it, there is certainly confusion about the fact that this gal fainted after a vaccine and you don’t have the satisfactory answers that she’s okay. But instead of jumping to a conclusion, it’s best to just think things out a little bit. Use a bit of reasoning.
Now, I don’t have all the answers. You absolutely could be right and there’s something fishy going on. But to me, personally, the big picture makes that seem highly unlikely.
You asked me for my thoughts and I gave them. I don’t know why that makes you angry but I hope we can just be adults about this while we talk it out instead of just name calling.
You didn’t give me your thoughts, you gave me the utter garbage MSM “debunk” of her “having been interviewed since”. When the lie was called out you attempt to gaslight me with semantics. Lastly, after I ignored your worthless shilling, you keep responding. This time you managed to present an original thought:
Now, I don’t have all the answers. You absolutely could be right and there’s something fishy going on.
That’s ever so slightly more critical thinking than the negligible amount you’ve shown so far. But unfortunately you continue being disingenuous in the rest of your comment so I’ll ignore that garbage bait.
She had been interviewed since she fainted. If you’re looking for information specifically x amount of days afterwards I don’t have anything for you, unfortunately, but the interview link I provided for you was conducted after, or “since,” the incident where she fainted. I’m not sure if you have another idea of what “since” means but perhaps this is where the miscommunication was
I’m not attempting to gaslight or bait you. You asked for an interview to support my claim that it happened afterward and I provided one.
I’m of course open to the possibility that something is amiss, but there is not a lot to support that she is dead other than I haven’t seen her give a public appearance more recently. However, I can say the same about my cousin Rich but I am confident he is still alive without doing further research.
Your video is practically part of the incident, taking place minutes after she passed out. If the theory is she died SINCE, then a video of the incident and 5 minutes after the incident don’t really have a single bearing on the fact that SINCE the incident, her socials have all been nuked (1000+ insta posts? Husband went from married to single due to account deletion? Wtf?) and her workplace is using an obvious lookalike in the only meager scrap presented as “proof of life” SINCE the incident
That’s not what I asked for and that’s not what I quoted you stating as a fact.
Shill
You quoted me as saying she had done interviews since the incident. This interview was taken after the incident.
I never specified “day after.” That was your own stipulation.
I am sorry that you misunderstood me but if you’re just going to downvote and poop your pants instead of just talking this out then you’re clearly only looking for information you want to hear.
Look I get it, there is certainly confusion about the fact that this gal fainted after a vaccine and you don’t have the satisfactory answers that she’s okay. But instead of jumping to a conclusion, it’s best to just think things out a little bit. Use a bit of reasoning.
Now, I don’t have all the answers. You absolutely could be right and there’s something fishy going on. But to me, personally, the big picture makes that seem highly unlikely.
You asked me for my thoughts and I gave them. I don’t know why that makes you angry but I hope we can just be adults about this while we talk it out instead of just name calling.
You didn’t give me your thoughts, you gave me the utter garbage MSM “debunk” of her “having been interviewed since”. When the lie was called out you attempt to gaslight me with semantics. Lastly, after I ignored your worthless shilling, you keep responding. This time you managed to present an original thought:
That’s ever so slightly more critical thinking than the negligible amount you’ve shown so far. But unfortunately you continue being disingenuous in the rest of your comment so I’ll ignore that garbage bait.
She had been interviewed since she fainted. If you’re looking for information specifically x amount of days afterwards I don’t have anything for you, unfortunately, but the interview link I provided for you was conducted after, or “since,” the incident where she fainted. I’m not sure if you have another idea of what “since” means but perhaps this is where the miscommunication was
I’m not attempting to gaslight or bait you. You asked for an interview to support my claim that it happened afterward and I provided one.
I’m of course open to the possibility that something is amiss, but there is not a lot to support that she is dead other than I haven’t seen her give a public appearance more recently. However, I can say the same about my cousin Rich but I am confident he is still alive without doing further research.
Your video is practically part of the incident, taking place minutes after she passed out. If the theory is she died SINCE, then a video of the incident and 5 minutes after the incident don’t really have a single bearing on the fact that SINCE the incident, her socials have all been nuked (1000+ insta posts? Husband went from married to single due to account deletion? Wtf?) and her workplace is using an obvious lookalike in the only meager scrap presented as “proof of life” SINCE the incident