All the complexity you see on this picture, and everything your mind assumes about each individual point...they all have one simple thing in common...ONEs consent by free will of choice to an offer made by another (((ones))) free will of choice.
This is called a "contract of belief" and it is against the reality we live in, because nature (ALL) is the source of all information; so no ONE within can offer a substitute source for information, but if one consents to such an offer made by another one, then one ignores adherence to nature (reality) by upholding within ones own mind a belief (fiction).
The reason why the picture you offered is so complex, is because they are keep offering us fiction to fill our minds with, while ignoring reality. It doesn't amtter which aspect of the presented fiction you choose to believe or not believe as long as you ignore reality.
What represents the highest value in all of reality? ONEs free will of choice to "evaluate" ALL else. That is what they don't want us to comprehend; it's what we ignore when we consent to the offer made by others...our self, and the intent behind ALL of reality is self sustenance.
I've come across this premise before, maybe even talked to you about it somewhere else. But I can't quite understand. Can you rephrase or is there a name for this so I can further research? Does it have anything to do with NLP or spell-casting?
It is all about framing, and the control of the institutions most people look to to seek their understanding of the world. Neuro-linguistic programming is all about framing. The words you use affect your image of reality. Casting spells is just the formation and dissemination of information. Control the narratives: control the peasantry.
In mysticism language use is magic. It is what we create the world from. The world is made of language. Every invention, innovation, cultural artefact is made out of ideas. So those who control the institutions create the culture, which is what everyone is mentally immersed in, and how people form their understanding of their perceived reality.
It's all about manipulation of people's perception through the clever use of language and by having a monopoly over the ideas people are exposed to. That's why censorship is key in the war for our minds. Reality is conceptual. Control the concepts: control the minds.
No. Nature doesn't name anything (because motion would disprove a fixed state). All communication of information is based on the consequences of actions set into motion; inspiring all within motion to adhere to self sustenance. Language is a corruption of communication that tempts us to proclaim the meaning of reality, while ignoring that reality is the source of predefined information, and that it is each of us within that lacks comprehension about what the perceived means.
The world that exists outside of us is made by our perception of it. Our understanding of it is built on concepts. Yes, the world is made of data, and we use language to process that data. "Nature doesn't name anything." So humans are not part of nature?
All the complexity you see on this picture, and everything your mind assumes about each individual point...they all have one simple thing in common...ONEs consent by free will of choice to an offer made by another (((ones))) free will of choice.
This is called a "contract of belief" and it is against the reality we live in, because nature (ALL) is the source of all information; so no ONE within can offer a substitute source for information, but if one consents to such an offer made by another one, then one ignores adherence to nature (reality) by upholding within ones own mind a belief (fiction).
The reason why the picture you offered is so complex, is because they are keep offering us fiction to fill our minds with, while ignoring reality. It doesn't amtter which aspect of the presented fiction you choose to believe or not believe as long as you ignore reality.
What represents the highest value in all of reality? ONEs free will of choice to "evaluate" ALL else. That is what they don't want us to comprehend; it's what we ignore when we consent to the offer made by others...our self, and the intent behind ALL of reality is self sustenance.
I've come across this premise before, maybe even talked to you about it somewhere else. But I can't quite understand. Can you rephrase or is there a name for this so I can further research? Does it have anything to do with NLP or spell-casting?
It is all about framing, and the control of the institutions most people look to to seek their understanding of the world. Neuro-linguistic programming is all about framing. The words you use affect your image of reality. Casting spells is just the formation and dissemination of information. Control the narratives: control the peasantry.
In mysticism language use is magic. It is what we create the world from. The world is made of language. Every invention, innovation, cultural artefact is made out of ideas. So those who control the institutions create the culture, which is what everyone is mentally immersed in, and how people form their understanding of their perceived reality.
It's all about manipulation of people's perception through the clever use of language and by having a monopoly over the ideas people are exposed to. That's why censorship is key in the war for our minds. Reality is conceptual. Control the concepts: control the minds.
The world is made of language
No. Nature doesn't name anything (because motion would disprove a fixed state). All communication of information is based on the consequences of actions set into motion; inspiring all within motion to adhere to self sustenance. Language is a corruption of communication that tempts us to proclaim the meaning of reality, while ignoring that reality is the source of predefined information, and that it is each of us within that lacks comprehension about what the perceived means.
The world that exists outside of us is made by our perception of it. Our understanding of it is built on concepts. Yes, the world is made of data, and we use language to process that data. "Nature doesn't name anything." So humans are not part of nature?