Holy fuck, you’re telling me “they” have been faking whistleblowers for over 20 years but that trump is actually a big meany doo-doo head who needs to be replaced by Joe Kamel?
As for contrarian I thought I just believed everything the MSM spouted. You guys really gotta get your stories straight when it comes to accusing me of things.
I haven't read any hit piece on him. I read his AMA and his direct words which were BULLSHIT. I've worked in IT for 23 years, InfoSec for the past 11. His metadata debunk was dumb as shit and so was the speed debunk.
Let's say the meta data did show USB transfer speeds, fine I'll totally give him that. It just shows the last transfer. It doesn't keep a history. It doesn't mean that they were taken from the servers by usb. The files could have been transferred 1000 times before that last transfer, then put on usb, then given to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks themselves could have our them on usb just to hide the previous metadata.
It does not show in any way shape or form that there was no hack. It's a dumb and uneducated talking point and people clueless about IT lap it up.
This is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe me, but you'd be won't not to.
Holy fuck, you’re telling me “they” have been faking whistleblowers for over 20 years but that trump is actually a big meany doo-doo head who needs to be replaced by Joe Kamel?
The hoops you fucking contrarians jump through...
I think you completely missed the point here, maybe intentionally, but I don't really care.
As for contrarian I thought I just believed everything the MSM spouted. You guys really gotta get your stories straight when it comes to accusing me of things.
A contrarian here does spout the MSM line on every subject...
Where do you think you read the hit piece on Binney that’s clearly influenced your mind totally?
I haven't read any hit piece on him. I read his AMA and his direct words which were BULLSHIT. I've worked in IT for 23 years, InfoSec for the past 11. His metadata debunk was dumb as shit and so was the speed debunk.
Let's say the meta data did show USB transfer speeds, fine I'll totally give him that. It just shows the last transfer. It doesn't keep a history. It doesn't mean that they were taken from the servers by usb. The files could have been transferred 1000 times before that last transfer, then put on usb, then given to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks themselves could have our them on usb just to hide the previous metadata.
It does not show in any way shape or form that there was no hack. It's a dumb and uneducated talking point and people clueless about IT lap it up.
This is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe me, but you'd be won't not to.
Great. So if he’s the only person raising that fact, why are you so intent to align with literally every other MSM voice on the issue?
Tell me, what do you think happened to Seth Rich?