I haven't read any hit piece on him. I read his AMA and his direct words which were BULLSHIT. I've worked in IT for 23 years, InfoSec for the past 11. His metadata debunk was dumb as shit and so was the speed debunk.
Let's say the meta data did show USB transfer speeds, fine I'll totally give him that. It just shows the last transfer. It doesn't keep a history. It doesn't mean that they were taken from the servers by usb. The files could have been transferred 1000 times before that last transfer, then put on usb, then given to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks themselves could have our them on usb just to hide the previous metadata.
It does not show in any way shape or form that there was no hack. It's a dumb and uneducated talking point and people clueless about IT lap it up.
This is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe me, but you'd be won't not to.
I know as a data analyst in any company with a grain of salt, he would not have had access to the emails.
I know that no one had ever been able to prove that he even had access our opportunity to take the emails. You don't just walk into a server room, plop in a usb and walk away with every email.
I know his family said he was 100% behind Hillary and was happy about a promotion he got our was getting.
No one had been able to answer the access question. They are starting with a conclusion and working backwards. Until sometime could prove to me that he could have taken then and exactly how, in not going to believe the fantasy.
As I said, I've worked in IT for 23 years or so. I have high standards for this.
Rofl yeah and molesta podesta’s pw was “password” I wouldn’t give the DNC cyber ops team the highest of laurels.
SR is a far more likely scenario, that as you admit, fits with the metadata. But keep on thinking it was the country with the economy the size of the state of Georgia’s lmfao
A contrarian here does spout the MSM line on every subject...
Where do you think you read the hit piece on Binney that’s clearly influenced your mind totally?
I haven't read any hit piece on him. I read his AMA and his direct words which were BULLSHIT. I've worked in IT for 23 years, InfoSec for the past 11. His metadata debunk was dumb as shit and so was the speed debunk.
Let's say the meta data did show USB transfer speeds, fine I'll totally give him that. It just shows the last transfer. It doesn't keep a history. It doesn't mean that they were taken from the servers by usb. The files could have been transferred 1000 times before that last transfer, then put on usb, then given to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks themselves could have our them on usb just to hide the previous metadata.
It does not show in any way shape or form that there was no hack. It's a dumb and uneducated talking point and people clueless about IT lap it up.
This is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe me, but you'd be won't not to.
Great. So if he’s the only person raising that fact, why are you so intent to align with literally every other MSM voice on the issue?
Tell me, what do you think happened to Seth Rich?
I know as a data analyst in any company with a grain of salt, he would not have had access to the emails.
I know that no one had ever been able to prove that he even had access our opportunity to take the emails. You don't just walk into a server room, plop in a usb and walk away with every email.
I know his family said he was 100% behind Hillary and was happy about a promotion he got our was getting.
No one had been able to answer the access question. They are starting with a conclusion and working backwards. Until sometime could prove to me that he could have taken then and exactly how, in not going to believe the fantasy.
As I said, I've worked in IT for 23 years or so. I have high standards for this.
Rofl yeah and molesta podesta’s pw was “password” I wouldn’t give the DNC cyber ops team the highest of laurels.
SR is a far more likely scenario, that as you admit, fits with the metadata. But keep on thinking it was the country with the economy the size of the state of Georgia’s lmfao