"Trump did this bad thing"
"That claim is disputed"
"No it's not. He really did it"
"There's no evidence of it"
"Here, look at this video"
"I'm not watching that. It's already been debunked"
"Debunked? There's a published report on it"
"I saw that report. There's a spelling mistake on Pg 4. It's worthless."
"But Trump is on video saying he did it!"
"That's manipulated media. It's taken out of context"
"Look, there are witnesses testimonies"
"They're lying. They're also radical far-left anarcho-communists. One of them is a felon."
You get the idea.The left lies and believes they are the sole arbiters of truth. But we don't have to play along. Just dismiss their claims as baseless and move along. It's what they do. So it's fair and square. .
Obfuscation. I'm more than able to have a discussion about a variety of topics, but I can't respond with any conciseness to seven or eight different points in a single thread. It's nonsensical rambling.
In your reply you mention election fraud, communism, war, US military policy, prosecuted journalists, Black Lives Matter, racism and pedophilia. Speaking of bad faith, you have no interest in having a discussion or understanding anyone's point of view.
"A closed mind is a dying mind" -- Edna Ferber
What exactly am I obfuscating? I have clear examples of corruption. The new york times is fucking running it now that the election was stolen. Now everybody knows biden is owned by CCP.
We're talking about presidential policy, thus warfare and a variety of subjects. I HIGHLY doubt if the roles were reversed and you made claims of trump being compromised by foreign interests with evidence to back it up all over mainstream media, that you would let me weasel out if it by crying "yOu cAnT tAlK aBoUt tRuMp aNd rAcIsM iN tHe sAmE cOmMeNt!!!"
Sounds pretty dumb when you put it like that, doesn't it?