No evidence has been offered that Dominion or Smartmatic used software or reprogrammed software that manipulated votes in the 2020 election.
I have a feeling that this was issued in response to an anticipated defamation lawsuit from the respective companies about the alleged conspiracy. Fox News recently did something similar. Is OANN next?
I guess everyone kind of has a different answer to that, general acceptance within a peer-reviewed community would probably be a good metric. In the defamation context, however, a defamatory statement is one made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
Among other things, the Newsmax article states:
I have a feeling that this was issued in response to an anticipated defamation lawsuit from the respective companies about the alleged conspiracy. Fox News recently did something similar. Is OANN next?
How much evidence does it take turn from anecdotal into empirical?
I guess everyone kind of has a different answer to that, general acceptance within a peer-reviewed community would probably be a good metric. In the defamation context, however, a defamatory statement is one made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
i mean didn't they block investigations so they couldn't find any?
OANN probably won't, given Chanel Rion's documentary that President Trump promoted.
Maybe, but at the end of the day they're a corporation that makes judgments based on risk. Time will tell.