Magic is and always has been real
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
I've seen this video and am unconvinced. Not only unconvinced, but it's extremely unconvincing. As someone who's dad was an amateur magician and I also dabbled in magic tricks, even I knew how many of these are done.
Watch some "masked magician" episodes where he reveals how complex illusions are performed. It may open your eyes to some of the methods.
Like James randi used to say, "if he's actually using real magic, hes doing it the hard way."
I've seen some behind the scenes magic stuff, and I agree some in the above vid are natural effects, but some stuff is demons (Chinese face changing for example (which was in version 1 of this vid, but can be found elsewhere online)). I get that we will prob. disagree on this.
Yea I'll agree to disagree. Ive seen the video and All dimond brother videos.
But you have to admit. When someone makes a documentary to show Super natural magic tricks, and you know how several of them are done through natural means, it discredits the entire documentary.
Really, what religion do you profess?
Well to be honest I'm not sure anymore. I was raised strict Roman Catholic. The sedavacantists have a point. Especially now with the commi pope. I really dont know what the hell is going on.
Logically that's not true. If one is preternatural and the rest are stage tricks, it would still prove a spiritual world. You take the position that there are zero, my position is some number greater than zero.
It shows that they have no background at trickery or sleight of hand and have no standing to make that type of video.
I just started watching it again. I dont know how everything is done. I know how ALLOT of it is done, particularly all of the David Copperfield illusions.
In fact these magic videos they put out were honestly so laughable to me that it gave their other videos less credit as well. Thats just human nature, why would I trust bad content.
Some weak ass logic there, considering you never once show how the demonstration in the video was fake. Just because you can link to some gay video where a guy mixes two chemicals to start a fire, that has literally ZERO bearing on the validity of what’s shown in this video. Skeptics^tm can suck randi dry for all I care but your opinion is wrong.
No. That logic is very fair. If the makers of the documentary cant spot trickery, they lose credibility on all similar claims. Its common sense.