Magic is and always has been real
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Yea I'll agree to disagree. Ive seen the video and All dimond brother videos.
But you have to admit. When someone makes a documentary to show Super natural magic tricks, and you know how several of them are done through natural means, it discredits the entire documentary.
Really, what religion do you profess?
Well to be honest I'm not sure anymore. I was raised strict Roman Catholic. The sedavacantists have a point. Especially now with the commi pope. I really dont know what the hell is going on.
Logically that's not true. If one is preternatural and the rest are stage tricks, it would still prove a spiritual world. You take the position that there are zero, my position is some number greater than zero.
It shows that they have no background at trickery or sleight of hand and have no standing to make that type of video.
I just started watching it again. I dont know how everything is done. I know how ALLOT of it is done, particularly all of the David Copperfield illusions.
In fact these magic videos they put out were honestly so laughable to me that it gave their other videos less credit as well. Thats just human nature, why would I trust bad content.
Its not their wheelhouse, they are monastics not stage magicians, but its not intellectually fair to disregard their other content on account of dislike of this video. St. Malachi's prophecy of the popes is almost up -- I do think the world is about to end and implore you and other honest people around here to take another look.
Thats fair.
I consider myself very intellectually honest, and thats a fair assessment. I'll never agree their magic video is evidence of anything supernatural.
So I'm of the position that the sedavacantists could be right but there is no way to really know for sure?. The sister Lucy imposter video is obviously true. They were obviously trying to cover up the 3rd secret. I know weve been lied to. What do you suggest?
Some weak ass logic there, considering you never once show how the demonstration in the video was fake. Just because you can link to some gay video where a guy mixes two chemicals to start a fire, that has literally ZERO bearing on the validity of what’s shown in this video. Skeptics^tm can suck randi dry for all I care but your opinion is wrong.
No. That logic is very fair. If the makers of the documentary cant spot trickery, they lose credibility on all similar claims. Its common sense.
You are asserting its trickery based on nothing other than how small your imagination is and how deep the randis of the world have brainfucked you.
You're so unaware. You're involved in 2 separate discussions, one of which is talking about a separate video. Not that one you posted (which ive already thanked you for posting and said it was quite impressive).