Could you tell me a little more about what Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz has to do with fractals. It seems he had a lot of contributions, it's tough to sort through and find something relevant.
That's just the thing...history aka the lie agreed upon represents vetted information, based on irrelevancy towards reality. It's complexity over simplicity to occupy the human consciousness with fiction. What one needs to comprehend is that the power structure behind the offered substitute information is based on selfishness, and on the intent of staying in power, which within shared energy (coexistence within motion) can only work if the majority can be tricked to ignore themselves (power).
My whole point with fractals are that they are the shape of distribution for everything, not circles, imo
Fractal; from fract "to break", so it's a break down of ALL into ONEs. ALL is ONE in energy...that's what I need to know; not the "science " of fractals. Why is it that I can find endless funny animations about fractals and an explanation like this: "a fractal is a self-similar subset of Euclidean space whose fractal dimension strictly exceeds its topological dimension"...yet, no mentioning about "ALL is ONE in energy".
The reason why they don't teach you this is because they don't want to plant a seed into your consciousness, so that it would allow you to grow your own potential; but instead they want you to focus on what they have to offer...all the sweet fiction for which you will ignore reality.
Energy doesn't have a "shape", because form is only needed for that within the momentum of the motion inside of energy. Your inception and your death exist without form as energy, yet not as form within the temporary momentum of motion. The physical within can only mentally comprehend the fundamental barriers of his existence, yet the physical existence within motion proves the fundamental rules motion operates on.
As for cycles...a balance within motion; based on loss and gain of potentiality; transmuting reoccurring form through resonance with base material (energy). Energy emitting out information through motion, which temporary form (resistance within momentum) can adhere to (mimic for recharge) or ignore (for loss). Maybe "spiral" is the more accurate term, but a spiral still moves circular, so I'm back at cycle. Motion applied to weaker and stronger impulses of form is still circular; isn't it?
I think you dismiss too much. You talk of the importance of self sustainment but for some reason believe the devices of personal achievement aren't worth trying to catalog. You say energy doesnt have a shape yet you talk of so many ways it can be manipulated.
I build on self. Everything is inspiration to self; not proclaimed assumption need to consent to.
You talk of the importance of self sustenance but for some reason believe the devices of personal achievement aren't worth trying to catalog.
The only thing one achieves (as residue within the loss/recharge "cycle" is within the shared bloodline; all the rest is circumstantial. Our way of thinking is corrupt, because ones proclamation about worthiness and achievements represents ones one assumptions, which when upheld as beliefs and proclaimed into reality, become belief based conflicts with other ones. Letting consciousness define out of endless circumstantial worth is a function (processing of information) BEFORE one acts upon it, and the action then has to be either in adherence to self sustenance or in ignorance thereof.
Language is the corruption as to why we are able to proclaim assumptions so selfishly, because we can only brand nature by ignoring that nature doesn't brand anything. A cow is a cow not because we call him a cow, but because nature allows us to distinguish through the use of all our senses what a cow is.
You say energy doesn't have a shape yet you talk of so many ways it can be manipulated.
When you add motion (loss of potentiality) to energy the need for shape comes into existence, as inspiration for all other conscious life to adhere to self sustenance. Your inception and your death do not have a shape, yet your physical existence (life) proves that they "are"; mentally on the other hand; you have no problem comprehending their shapeless existence.
The difference between the two is that the physical is tied to the inside of motion, while the mental represents the connection to the outside of motion (energy; the source of information we mimic; we transmute form out of). As I stated; we exist within balance (momentum), so outside and inside are communicating with each other...BUT if we adhere or ignore it is the choice of our free will, because both choices are needed for balance (one for loss; one for gain/recharge).
Could you tell me a little more about what Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz has to do with fractals. It seems he had a lot of contributions, it's tough to sort through and find something relevant.
That's just the thing...history aka the lie agreed upon represents vetted information, based on irrelevancy towards reality. It's complexity over simplicity to occupy the human consciousness with fiction. What one needs to comprehend is that the power structure behind the offered substitute information is based on selfishness, and on the intent of staying in power, which within shared energy (coexistence within motion) can only work if the majority can be tricked to ignore themselves (power).
My whole point with fractals are that they are the shape of distribution for everything, not circles, imo
Fractal; from fract "to break", so it's a break down of ALL into ONEs. ALL is ONE in energy...that's what I need to know; not the "science " of fractals. Why is it that I can find endless funny animations about fractals and an explanation like this: "a fractal is a self-similar subset of Euclidean space whose fractal dimension strictly exceeds its topological dimension"...yet, no mentioning about "ALL is ONE in energy".
The reason why they don't teach you this is because they don't want to plant a seed into your consciousness, so that it would allow you to grow your own potential; but instead they want you to focus on what they have to offer...all the sweet fiction for which you will ignore reality.
Energy doesn't have a "shape", because form is only needed for that within the momentum of the motion inside of energy. Your inception and your death exist without form as energy, yet not as form within the temporary momentum of motion. The physical within can only mentally comprehend the fundamental barriers of his existence, yet the physical existence within motion proves the fundamental rules motion operates on.
As for cycles...a balance within motion; based on loss and gain of potentiality; transmuting reoccurring form through resonance with base material (energy). Energy emitting out information through motion, which temporary form (resistance within momentum) can adhere to (mimic for recharge) or ignore (for loss). Maybe "spiral" is the more accurate term, but a spiral still moves circular, so I'm back at cycle. Motion applied to weaker and stronger impulses of form is still circular; isn't it?
I think you dismiss too much. You talk of the importance of self sustainment but for some reason believe the devices of personal achievement aren't worth trying to catalog. You say energy doesnt have a shape yet you talk of so many ways it can be manipulated.
I think you dismiss too much.
I build on self. Everything is inspiration to self; not proclaimed assumption need to consent to.
You talk of the importance of self sustenance but for some reason believe the devices of personal achievement aren't worth trying to catalog.
The only thing one achieves (as residue within the loss/recharge "cycle" is within the shared bloodline; all the rest is circumstantial. Our way of thinking is corrupt, because ones proclamation about worthiness and achievements represents ones one assumptions, which when upheld as beliefs and proclaimed into reality, become belief based conflicts with other ones. Letting consciousness define out of endless circumstantial worth is a function (processing of information) BEFORE one acts upon it, and the action then has to be either in adherence to self sustenance or in ignorance thereof.
Language is the corruption as to why we are able to proclaim assumptions so selfishly, because we can only brand nature by ignoring that nature doesn't brand anything. A cow is a cow not because we call him a cow, but because nature allows us to distinguish through the use of all our senses what a cow is.
You say energy doesn't have a shape yet you talk of so many ways it can be manipulated.
When you add motion (loss of potentiality) to energy the need for shape comes into existence, as inspiration for all other conscious life to adhere to self sustenance. Your inception and your death do not have a shape, yet your physical existence (life) proves that they "are"; mentally on the other hand; you have no problem comprehending their shapeless existence.
The difference between the two is that the physical is tied to the inside of motion, while the mental represents the connection to the outside of motion (energy; the source of information we mimic; we transmute form out of). As I stated; we exist within balance (momentum), so outside and inside are communicating with each other...BUT if we adhere or ignore it is the choice of our free will, because both choices are needed for balance (one for loss; one for gain/recharge).