3
vanillabluesea 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea. Being transported to Texas sounds making sense. But 5 in the morning? Maybe it's nothing. And for Trump, the word is he's still there.

Unconfirmed Bits: A) The beige coat lady was checking to make sure (?) everyone's on board. B) There were two Ospreys. C) The ADS–Bs were to be turned off. D) Aerial refuelings were scheduled.

3
vanillabluesea 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just home and got the word that right now there's a video clip going around on TikTok which shows people are boarding to HMX-1 lands Osprey at an airport tarmac. At the five in the morning. :D Supposedly White House staff are leaving DC. Quick Google search didn't show anything related. Currently tracking down said video clip. When something substantial surfaces, I'll update.

EDIT to ADD: And I am wondering if anyone got any info on this video.

1
vanillabluesea 1 point ago +1 / -0

TL;DR - If Trump wants the military to get involved in the situation, he would need to have (or he would appear to have) the support from the majority of the public.


I had a couple of all-out discussions on the similar topics with people in my work sphere.

POTUS losing his platform (by or because of domestic threats) would cause a military takeover?

No. Even if there's a law which can be interpreted as "unlawfully imprisoning the high-level American officials may call for a military intervention as a conflict resolution," the word is it won't happen this time for Trump.

I myself didn't know this: Nixon didn't want to give up and was intended to fight till the end.

Then, the top military brass (George S. Brown, Creighton W. Abrams, James L. Holloway, & David C. Jones to be exact) asserted to Nixon that they won't be involved. Their reasoning (or excuse, depending on how you want to see it) was said to be that Nixon was elected unlawfully. After he realized the military won't be sided with him, Nixon gave up.

Yea, just like what you think as reading this, my response was; "Exactly! Biden was elected unlawfully! No?"

No, that's not the point. The decision point is "It's not up to Trump. It depends on how the military see the current situation. Is it going to be necessary? And more importantly, until the military believe they got the support from the public, they won't budge an inch.

Whether or not manufactured, do we as the US public believe the Trump team (appears to) have the public's support now?

I think this is why we are witnessing the unification by all the establishment factions and their singing a song that Trump is a domestic terrorist. spits on the ground

2
vanillabluesea 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea. Their establishment's + MSM's attitude was

"Come on, this is not 1970s anymore! There cannot be a wide spread vote fraud! Modern devices are used and there are so many watchers!

Are you sure? Do you have an evidence? That's not an evidence! It's been debunked by the national election committee? No? If vote frauds were that rampant, why do you think the DOJ said there aren't enough of causes to start an investigation? And why do you think the cases were thrown out from the court?

You're just stupid if you still think there was a wide spread vote fraud.

What? Of course those machines are made in China. Nowadays, all the electronic devices are made in China. Didn't you know? So, you're saying data from the QR code on the ballots were sent to servers outside of S. Korea? Are you sure? What's wrong whit it even if it happened?

Move on, man. All the elections have been rigged. Not just this one. It's all show, man. Election do not matter to ordinary people like us."

And the exact same thing has happened here.

Sigh

5
vanillabluesea 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting. I'm close to math illiterate but will definitely get help to read + understand the information.

I think I once mentioned many similarities between 2020 US election and 2020 S. Korean election.

I must say, I don't doubt the frauds in 2020 US election happened not because too much evidence has surfaced. But because how they have handled the afterwards.

After the S. Korean election, even with countless blatant proofs of voter fraud,

S. Korean media ignored those proofs + insisted there's no wide-spread fraud; their justice department refused to investigate; and the local & supreme courts threw away all the cases on the technicality.

Sounds familiar? Hm. shaking-head-in-disbelief.gif

Oh, I was making a comment saying I hope r/conspiracy would survive under the mod like you because that bloody sub is/was one of the only few on the entire Reddit we can voice against the main narrative and exchange the information & opinion without getting banned ... while you were getting perma banned. Ha. :D See you around.

1
vanillabluesea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take the black pill. Trump was in on the entire charade the whole time. Hope you had fun for the last 4 years, and believe me, I held out hope he was the real deal all the way til yesterday.

I would have no problem with accepting the hypothesis that Trump was in on the entire charade the whole time, if enough data points would suggest said hypothesis.

However, the most critical point convinces me otherwise is that because of the US-China trade war, many of globalist's assets in China went bankrupt or said trade war hit them into near bankruptcy. And the outcome of about two years trade war has caused numerous cash-strained conditions in the CCP's state asset managements, most of their BRI have currently gone to shit, which by the way prominent globalists such as Shaul Elovitch have heavily invested in. Altogether, within three years, we're talking literally trillions of dollars in damage.

But the majority of people do not know that because the US MSMs have only reported disinformation pieces like "U.S. trade deficit surged in July to highest in 12 years."

So, my question to the opinion that "Trump was in on the entire charade the whole time" is that if Trump has been on this whole charade, why the data show his administration has been hell bent on destroying the globalist assets for the last three years?

1
vanillabluesea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks. Tbh, I thought the email chain was genuine. Because of the timing of Atterholt having gone back to Indiana Utility Commission + the fact that not many people even in DC knew the name, Patroldesign. Hm. Definitely need to put it back to the "dig deeper & trace more" folder.

1
vanillabluesea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, these are literally referring to the SATIRE SITE that published these like four years ago. Are you fucking serious?

Hm. I didn't know this.

I thought the email chain LLinWood posted on Parler was originally from an article by a small political blog site called American Digital News. Thought said email chain was between James Atterholt (Mike Pence's close confident) and other RINO operatives such as John David Hoppe.

But, if I understand what you're saying correctly, it's a fake made up by a satirical blog/news site? Do you remember the name of the site by any chance?

1
vanillabluesea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heard that it's a popular (?) self-protection tactic in the intelligence community. A countermeasure for in case the security line is compromised and one's device containing critical file(s) is seized by the opponent.

6
vanillabluesea 6 points ago +6 / -0

Probably, it's close to a bad anecdote but the word is that

Trump wanted to deploy military in order to confiscate the dominion machines & servers.

But some of his advisors strongly disagreed and the top brass of military refused to listen. (And they suggested he would need to concede. :D)

While this hackling is happening within, the logistics (?) were changed and their attempts to get necessary subpoenas (to acquire the machines & severs) were buried. Trump himself was said to be against the full blown martial law.

But I agree with the idea that he (or his team) was the world's last chance that would go against against the Rockefeller-JPMorganChase-CCP-Bush-ClintonObama clique.

Excuse my wordings.

view more: ‹ Prev