0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

bLoOmBeRg

it's common fucking sense, we went over this already.

Goddamn you're a fucking retard

0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

No shit it should've been released but your retarded brain can't connect the dots that Trump is covering it up because he's complicit in all of it.

Fuck off to GayAwakening.

0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did you know that if a defendant withholds or destroys evidence in a trial, a judge can instruct the jury to assume the evidence was unfavorable to the defendant?

So not only is it a legal concept, it's COMMON FUCKING SENSE to assume the worst when people are hiding something.

And why the fuck are you even in here if you're such an NPC who can't think for yourself? Fuck off to your GayAwakening with the other pedophile protectors.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1951414213047402571

Context: Tucker recently interviewed Candace Owens where the subject of his father was brought up and he said he only found out about his father's CIA ties after he died

https://xcancel.com/etherXwave/status/1951351841184248314

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://xcancel.com/disclosetv/status/1951303401146327092

Good luck finding this (or finding it upvoted) on TheDonald and GayAwakening b/c they protect pedophiles

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

He deleted it and reposted it, fixed it for you, thanks for the heads up

4
user20461 4 points ago +4 / -0

Appeared in The Handmaid’s Tale

I'm currently polishing a Fell For It Again Award for when she comes out and denounces her race, acknowledges her "privilege", and speaks out against "racism".

I still haven't forgotten about when people were fawning over Taylor Swift being a closet RWer because she had never spoken about politics.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

For real, it's weaponized against us and we're led to believe if we don't allow it that real free speech will die.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the right move, but "former" liberals, who migrated to the right, equate porn to free speech despite the fact that it's not speech or expression and has no correlation to free speech.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol thanks for reminding me about the boot theory and how John McCain was secretly executed.

4
user20461 4 points ago +4 / -0

Send my condolences to your family for their burden

Blocked

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, what are you doing about these "bunch of clowns who believe clown politicians"?

What does it matter? How is it related to this thread?

I've seen you around, btw, and you're always starting problems with people. Find a hobby and thank me later.

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

We (c/Conspiracies regulars) see a bunch of clowns who believe clown politicians

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://xcancel.com/AFpost/status/1946291519994118283

Link to the document

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2025-07-18%20RJD%20Letter%20to%20FBI%20Director%20Patel%20re%20Epstein.pdf
3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1945984541266702745

Re: WSJ Letter:

It doesn't read like something Trump would write. And I also don't think he would make a drawing. Trump's best allies are the liberal media that always make up a fake claim for his supporters to rally around to defend him.


Re: Grand Jury Testimony:

No way in hell they're releasing anything of substance (or it's fake/redacted) after stonewalling the release of the Epstein files.

Here's what one guy had to say:

https://xcancel.com/AdameMedia/status/1946027104895672581

DONT BE FOOLED

This is damage control.

Grand jury transcripts are a nothingburger.

What about the videos?

Photographs?

Sworn witness interviews?

The emails? The text messages?

The hard drives?

Unseal. Every. File.

DONT STOP ATTACKING TRUMP

0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

He already just said at TPUSA that Epstein was working for Israel. So this is likely out of context.

Is the thread claiming otherwise?

Does the video not include Tucker saying that Israel is implicated?

What exactly is out of context here?

It sounds like you're just repeating phrases you don't understand.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›