We all know that Steins and Bergs are associated with Jews, but what about Caseys?
Well doing a good search for his name shows a remarkable amount of Jesuits and priests with that last name.
Jesuit Reverand Patrick Casey http://www.nytimes.com/1941/11/07/archives/rev-patrick-h-casey-member-of-jesuit-community-at-fordham-had.html
Dr Patrick Casey who states "my first contact with the Jesuits was when I went to high school" and " “if you want to get the more exact profile on me, describe me as a Jesuit.”" https://luc.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_8a85c742-34c4-43a4-8e85-666596b66a65/
A Catholic priest named Patrick Casey convicted of satanic sexual abuse of a man who came to him for help https://web.archive.org/web/20230208041255/https://www.snapnetwork.org/fr_patrick_casey_pleads_guilty_snap_reacts
And this isn't even just the surname, this is his full first and last name, Patrick Casey showing up multiple times. That's really something.
The Groypers, for those who don't know, are Nick Fuentes' movement, he's the rising Roman star being used to take control of America for the Vatican.
With all the shills telling you non-stop with their gay little jpegs "Only look at Jews!! It's all the Jews!!" you know they are about to pull a fast one and give you a new false savior. That false savior is Romanism, it's Catholic Theocracy to "defeat the Jews". Sure Rome might defeat the Jews, but it's one sock puppet of the devil defeating another. So stay vigilant to any real people falling for it.
inb4: "b-b-but I call Nick Fuentes gay, I'm not a useful idiot for Rome!" Yeah you just push every single talking point his movement does and you ignore the fact it's a Roman Catholic movement.
That slippery little faggot just reminds me of some of these fed nazis I interact with.
Though he may be slightly less of a low life.
Christ is King! Christ is Risen! But Hitler is still dead. Amen.
Come to think of it, this could explain what's the matter with JosephGoebbel5. He's taken too many "last stands"
Haha. You are one crazy Nigger!
Checkmate.
Haha Nigger Nigger Nigger! I win.
Haha yeah. Just them crazy niggers! Nigger!
Nigger! Checkmate, I win.
You deflect with other, irrelevant questions.
Ahahahaha. Ok that's enough jokes today fed, waste someone elses time. https://media.scored.co/post/Y6jBz6qXK7f2.gif
Nigger! Checkmate, I win.
Nigger Nigger Nigger. Checkmate. QED.
Yep. I said Nigger last, I win!
Nigger nigger nigger! Checkmate
I have no issue having African genetics (or any genetics I have).
So let's see if your logic checks out. If a race has the most murders of any other race, therefore, there is literally no good that comes from them? Did I get that right?
So what is the specific cut off point where a murder rate means an entire race is "no good"? This all seems highly subjective.
Nigger nigger nigger!
Therefore what?
Why do whites lead in murder statistics over Japanese?
Because Japanese genes are good and white genes are bad right? Japanese have the saintly genes and whites are just damned to hell because they commit more murders.
I'm just reflecting back the idiotic argument you plan to make.
Calm down Dresden. Your question is just so silly on its face. It's like you're just trying to be offensive rather than discuss.
More deflection.
Deflection. Insult. Deflect. Post Links. That's all you do.
Ahaha. Shill called for backup. Or it's just your other alt.
People forget there are two sides to this. They have thesis and anti-thesis. The shills want us to just focus on Jews, so when they do throw Jews under the bus people will think the good guys won.
Same weird evasive style as the other shills. You can't make a direct counter arguments, then descend into insults and link posting.
It's just not normal human behavior.
Let me remind you again of the question
Why wouldn't you hang a white psychopath just the same? Afraid your neck would be on the line one day?
Nothing has been addressed.
Step 1: Make no point
Step 2: Claim the other person is dumb
Step 3: Declare victory
The fact is, you couldn't elaborate on your point, because it's not a solid argument if you actually formed it into words properly.
Another weird evasive answer. Nobody asked for the definition of per capita, it's not in dispute.
What unit are you with? Do they honestly train you to behave like this?
Per capita is modifier to a statement, therefore not a complete sentence. It's a dependent phrase.
Also what a lack of any rebuttal if you need to post an entire documentary. You people all behave in the same weird evasive ways. It's not natural.
Speaking of those who aren't people. Have you noticed they all follow a similar playbook of engagement?
You ask them a question, they stonewall, they ask another question that's barely related or pretend they didn't understand and then go straight into ridicule. Eventually they just post text with links to some dumb meme or something. It doesn't feel like real human behavior, just propagandist trolling.
You know what they remind me of, the early 9/11 "debunker" trolls. It's always deflect, joke, ridicule, but never engage in good faith.