He's not a right winger. He's a retarded fed boi larping his ass off.
thats what a fed boi would say. Typical low iq fed boi
You one of zaps many alts? I've noticed a trend here, distinctly associated with this fed boi.
I'm a bit confused here. She was already in trouble for different election related offenses, no?
Honestly I hate GWP. This headline makes it seem like she was one of the mules exposed in the documentary (presumably with at least one video and geo-location data as supporting evidence).
But it's not clear how the arrest relates to their analysis.
The article says this: "Alma Yadira Juarez pleaded guilty and admitted to police that Fuentes gave her the ballots to stuff in drop boxes."
So is Alma one of the mules they identified in Arizona? And now they've connected the dots in a larger conspiracy in terms of the source of those ballots?
If so, then this is a big deal, but slightly different from what the headline suggest.
All true. It's fun to be a dick to people who are transparently stupid and cannot reason for themselves.
I could use better choice of words, but that would be less fun. And I enjoy contentious debate, but mostly when it's someone intelligent and not some illogical dipshit who acts like a shill.
Why would I use an offensive retort here? What you said was not offensive.
You made a quality and meaningful observation that required time, effort, and thinking.
You delivered your point cohesively and without deceptive or stupid logic.
You get more points from me than 99% of the morons here.
You mispelled "fed".
You are the retard, fedboy.
This is what two bots talking to eachother looks like.
I'm pretty sure you're a fucking fed, actually.
I know what you're up to you fucking loser.
10$ says Zap is a fed.
I don't give a shit if people use personal attacks. Especially when they come off as a dumb cunt like you. Those attacks have to make sense to actually hit, and so far, there's only been one insult lobbed at me here that I actually deserved.
I wouldn't advocate those people be banned either. You either.
Who gives a flying fuck.
Might be a bot. Look at the name and what they quoted, and the response ignores context for the most part, beyond a potential keyword-based trigger.
And FYI, I know plenty of conservatives who are pro-choice. I myself don't really have a position on it.
I see the merits in both sides arguments and think it comes down to people valuing different things and having different morals. Nothing wrong with that.
It's an irreconcilable difference in morals that cannot be remedied with any amount of debate--it's used by the elites as a social wedge issue to manipulate and distract the public.
People could just like... eat healthy vegetables and move on with their lives.
Shit is so ridiculous.
Zap, you seem a lot like a sussy fed boi, not gonna lie.
Sounds like some of the mods here... (zap?).
But yeah.. that is suspect as fuck.
And I will continue to tell you all when you're being naïve imbeciles and spreading disprovable nonsense.
You cannot stop me or censor me.
But yeah, keep defending censorship you fucking loser. I'm here for the 1% of actually intelligent users who want to engage in productive debate and discussion.
Sounds like you're trying to cover for one of the mods on this sub, who 100% issued a ban.
They might not remove the posts, but there's a reason they banned me. Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered.
Probably so they can continue to use their alts to pump shill accusations anytime I attack their pet theories.
"Look at that handshake shill".
It's not uncommon to do these drills in schools. I remember doing them at least once a year up until highschool.
You lock your classroom doors, and remain quiet as someone comes around and jiggles the handles of the door. They test the intercom system etc.
It's pretty stupid and useless. In fact, it might backfire if there's a real situation and kids think it's just another drill.
Misunderstanding. I meant to say sub not site. The error is mine, but the general point still stands.
Controlled opposition is only useful if it represents the views of opposition.
If they don't pivot like this, then someone else will rise in their place that they don't control.
At least this way they can slip things in when they need, and carefully misdirect, etc.