This one's pretty relevant right now: 2009 HIV/AIDS Documentary: House of Numbers - Anatomy of an Epidemic @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvDqjXTByF4&t=1s guess whose favourite jab-czar is in there muddying the definitions to push toxic jabs on people?

Pleasure. Yeah there's a lot of different things that could be done. If I had the skills to make these, I'd be making them in a way to get accross the main point of several related articles, with qr codes/urls for people to see the papers / memoryholed msm clips / buried news articles themselves.

For example, stories like these:

https://amp.9news.com.au/article/04697462-e53f-4587-8aa3-a793af9a38fb

https://www.spectator.com.au/2021/08/most-covid-patients-at-israeli-hospital-fully-vaccinated-what-does-this-mean-for-australia/

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/141-people-in-hospital-with-quot-covid-quot-140-of-them-vaccinated-triangle-in-the-triangle-hole_BBwwuonJRhJF1la.html

https://archive.md/0CMuz

might go well with stuff like:

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00648-4 (same transmission indoors between jab/unjab with same initial viral loads, the jabbed just return to baseline a little quicker)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/ (pop % jabbed is not correlated with number of cases as we'd expect if the jabs were effective)

So in that concept, we're sticking to showing examples of jabs meaning nothing for the spread. Then say, in another one we could go for something along the lines of 'Does Pfizer really have your kids best interests at heart?' or 'Can we really trust Pfizer?'

then hit em with stuff like

https://archive.jsonline.com/business/39719447.html/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437699/

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

https://www.corpwatch.org/article/pfizer-admits-bribery-eight-countries

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2635 (whistleblower on data integrity issues in Pfizer trial - yuge)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/aayushipratap/2021/07/28/pfizer-expects-335-billion-in-vaccine-revenue-in-2021/?sh=f12a3e6217d4

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/sep/10/pfizer-accused-of-holding-brazil-to-ransom-over-vaccine-contract-demands

the key bits of info from the above should shatter the 'Pfizer just wants whats best for our health'

etc etc. Sorry for the formatting but yeah I hope that gets the idea accross.

Great initiative! Here are some ideas for infographics:

Risk benefit angle:

0. Show some background on Vax tech, establish that we are in a worldwide phase 3 clinical trial - maybe even comparing decades to century old safety data vs this new emergency use rushed in bs (with negligent trials as per the recent wistleblower from Pfizer).

1. Try to make it clear to the audience about the actual risks of Covid and how you basically have to be 80yrs old with comorbidities / obese to increase your likelihood of badtimes beyond the chance of winning 10k in a scratchy.

2. Show some graphs/counts of adverse reactions in the vigiaccess.com, openvaers.com, https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html (there's a lot of stuff that just won't mix with 'safe and effective') - could also pinch adverse reaction stories from that WXYZ-tv channel 7 facebook covid post, few decent ones floating about on the tubes.

3. The jab doesn't stop you getting it, nor stop you spreading it and has had no impact on covid-19 population wide infection levels - it just attenuates the symptoms making you feel like you don't have it (and potentially making it spread more because people don't know they've got it/are sharing it) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/

Bad Pharma angle:

4. There have been several stories recently about Pfizer bullying South American countries into signing over military installations, diplomatic buildings etc as collateral - as well as taking responsibility for adverse reactions and giving Pfizer immunity from responsibility/litigation (would you trust your health to a company that refuses to stand by their product?)

5. Pfizer have been slapped with some 2bn in fines in the recent past, they're also projected to earn 35bn since this began, meanwhile Moderna has minted a bunch of new Forbes top 400 richest types in America. (Pretty sure it won't be hard to dig up more misconduct)

6. Seeing as they're admitting myocarditis, do an infographic showing just how rare this is among young healthy people, how fucked up one's prognosis is for having it, and just how prevalent it is as an adverse event. https://archive.md/0CMuz (in an Aus paper, they linked 60 cases of it to Pfizer directly and claim that 6.7 cases in 100,000 people is an acceptably rare risk)

7. I saw a post yesterday about Jacinta Arden (NZ's PM) having a networth of 800k before the pandemic, and shooting up to 25 mill on a ~400k salary - shit like this would look amazing juxtaposed next to stories of the little guys having their shit pushed in by the economic shutdown. Highly skilled and motivated people being refused employment because they won't join in this global phase 3 trial necessitating the importation of immigrants to fill in a manufactured gap.