5
newuserfromreddit 5 points ago +6 / -1

I got banned months ago for telling them they need to start thinking of political strategies for after January 6th. I got called a fag a couple dozen times, told to "follow the plan," and stop being a doomer.

Welp. Here we are.

by TlKr
-7
newuserfromreddit -7 points ago +2 / -9

Do you guys have a real-time data file of all the usernames on this site anywhere? Not passwords or anything like that, I'd just like to cross-reference usernames on here to usernames on other sites (e.g., Reddit, TDW, etc.) and see what the composition is.

by TlKr
-6
newuserfromreddit -6 points ago +1 / -7

Does the current one not work? I've never used it.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Totally real, also totally legalese. Of course, that's what it comes down to in situations like this. Congressional legal strategies are absolutely amazing and insane, I don't ever want to practice in that field.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

As long as "us" means the minority of Americans that supported Trump, I agree wholeheartedly.

For the remainder of us, we support the new presidency and congressional composition. Big companies and MSM have been issues since the mid-20th century, no single term of governance is going to change that.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Totally agree on the first two. I think if anything was going to be declassified, it would have been by now -- not like the last 12 days are some magic period where declassification is somehow easier than the prior four years.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

I wouldn't necessarily call it peaceful either, lol, I just don't think it really meets the definition of what we tend to call terrorism. Time will tell if we see more of this I suppose.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20th, my focus now turns to ensuring a smooth, orderly, and seamless transition of power.

Serving as your President has been the honor of my lifetime. To all my wonderful supporters, I know you are disappointed.

-9
newuserfromreddit -9 points ago +3 / -12

LMFAO. Jesus Christ we're entering an entirely new realm of make believe at this point. This is better than Netflix.

-16
newuserfromreddit -16 points ago +5 / -21

Not like we predicted this for months. But whatever, just label us shills and downvote away.

Trust the plan.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

That's some pretty strong copium man.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

I guess, but he said "a few huge attacks that will have the nation in mourning." Maybe that's still coming, but I don't think the events on the 6th meet that phrasing.

3
newuserfromreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just about every election forecaster also predicted that the result wouldn't be announced on election night, not that strong of a corroboration for having precognition lol

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

All I see right now is unsubstantiated claims, something Gaetz isn't unfamiliar with. He literally has his own dedicated factchecker, lmfao.

We already know at least some of those in the capitol are confirmed Trump supporters. I think at this point, its more a game of sorting out who isn't.

2
newuserfromreddit 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's definitely a concession speech, but it looks really weird. He's also not talking how he usually talks. If I had to guess, this is some speech that was heavily scripted by his team to try and give republicans a leg to stand on when he gets impeached again.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +3 / -2

He also said he was committing to a peaceful transition of power lol. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

You sound a little triggered at the suggestion that Trump, the oh-so-holy man that totally wasn't also the establishment, incited the riot. I think you're watching the ball, not the batter.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

Even assuming all you said is true, which I wouldn't agree, that still doesn't mean they invited this. Your logic is essentially that, by not taking above-ordinary measures to prevent an angry mob, they invited that angry mob. You're neglecting to remember what side literally called for a trial by combat, then said they would lead protesters to the capitol.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Invite other side to cause havoc.

I think the other side kinda invited themselves...

2
newuserfromreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has he actually released these facial recognition results anywhere, or is he just talking out of his ass like Gaetz usually does? Edit: Confirmed. Gaetz is talking out of his ass, ironically in part by relying on the MSM. The facial recognition company issued a cease and desist and denied these results.

2
newuserfromreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The settlement offer, if you can even call it that, was apparently to "share as much information as we can."

Yeah, let's see how that goes.

2
newuserfromreddit 2 points ago +3 / -1

Total snowflakes. Banning people for disagreeing with you is such a pussy move.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›