I don't know what it is, man.. but it's hilarious.. like by the ankles next, eh. It has to do with the cabal.. inverse.. watch any mainstream movies.. what are their narratives. It's all against Yahweh.. these guys who are snooty on insta, never reply.. have to reach what.. 95% service to self for their lucifer soul group.
So this pants going lower by the year.. like what do they do in movies.. The multiculturalism agenda.. on and on. Extrapolate that graph from previous decades for whatever odd stuff's going on now from your parents generation. lol
Well how about how you can order any celeb. Hang on lemme get a couple bookmarks from last weekend where I was talking to who owns my job about hey lets get a reality tv show on NBC, CBS or ABC. And how much it'd cost to have some celebs stop by. lol. Lower level they name prices under, eh. Like.. checked a random category and was like ok celebrity chefs.. whats his name hell's kitchen.. 100k for him to stop by. lol. Higher level you'd have to say hey to them and deal with their agent, right. Lemme get these couple bookmarks from years ago.
That was a good one.. like for work I was there.. I picture The rock and what's his name.. John Cena doing my job with another guy. It's like a sport almost at that point this hard labour job. Warehouse deal with bunch shit the whole night heavy stuff, eh. But yeah.. they're in there on UTA.. united talent. Like who are their agents, right.. I could go on. You think of celeb agencies.. what are there.. LA... eh.. so like CAA. Anyways that was a good one, where think of a couple high level and you can get them.
Lemme get this other one.
"Booking Agency - Private & Corporate Event Entertainment - Booking Entertainment"
https://www.bookingentertainment.com/
That's more music bands but they got high level in the celeb category.
ok I gotta go.. lol.. going to post something, reading replies from the other weekend.
What are some of the other things the elite puppet masters have their puppet role model celebs do in recent years, that might be thought of as stupid in future years. I don't know.. these guys getting tattoos on their faces. Lots of those rapper kids.
The piercings too.. get that shit off your face. How about those big black earring hoop holes where their lobes are all saggy if they're out. lol.
At some point they gotta be thinking.. I don't care if it's a fad or in style.. you know once the fad is over like ones from previous decades.. you'll be thinking you're a fuckin "fool" going around looking like a buffoon. You can tell the look on these guys faces they're like.. hmm.. I think I might be looking like a dipshit. lol. It's like what the fuck is next in later years, right. The pants by your fuckin ankles? lol.. don't give them any ideas.
oh just not drinking as much. haha. Busy monitoring crypto graph behavior.
Looking at this past data here.. it seems to be "inverse" where shit you think is good like the fuckin ww2 ending.. is at a low point in the graph. lol. Lemme check more of these. The titanic.. high point.. "for them". ww1 is bad though.. where.. when it starts that's a low point and when it ends.. high point. So that's inverse to this inverse observation. 1933 federal reserve is a high point. 1939 ww2 starting.. just off low point. When ww2 ends though.. low point. So that doesn't match up. You'd think that'd be a high point.. right. But you just had fuckin nukes. lol. Then ya got JFK.. off a high point. The moon landing.. a low point. Off gold standard, high point. 1980, price of gold all time high.. high point. For them, right. 87 stock market crash.. off a low point. That seems to be just by 1990. Only thing I can think of is like end of hair band rock.. grunge comes in. lol. Decades they like to change shit eh.. like 1980 buncha rock stars croaking. 2000 tech bubble burst.. seems off a bit of a low point. That looks like about 98 there. 9/11's just off a high point. Which would be a high point for them. I don't know.. the data, ok. lol. 2008 housing crisis.. off a high point.. for them cause they buy shit cheap. The gold price was really low like mid 90's. They like low price shit eh.. cause they buy it up then.
What are we looking at here with like 2030, 2050, extrapolation. lol. High point around 2024. Low point 2028. 2030 is what.. these guys and the metaverse, eh.. lol.. 2030 nearing a high point. Bad shit low point 2035. High point 2039. Which is like 100 years after ww2 starting. Low point 2043. High point 2046. 2050 matches up with low point.
At least in here I'm matching the low points of the waveform. It's not whole decades matching though.. so.. I don't know.. What you gotta do is go with where the bottom points of the waveform match up. Then had whatever decade points that was.. and matched those. So.. something there, I bet. lol. But do these low points back in time match. I don't know.. that's your fuckin data. haha
You crack me up.. lol.. trust me.. if you go to the supermarket around here.. you'll be the only white guy. Immigration is crazy. Order shit it won't be somebody caucasian delivering it. Trust me.. if there was somewhere else.. and I had the money.. I wouldn't be here.. hahaha
You're wondering about the putting somebody's consciousness in another body. Have you heard about the Donald Marshall stuff.
I don't know what's up with this but it seems similar to what went on with cigarettes. Think of how things were in previous decades.. where they knew this was going on. What are they shifting to next that they aren't telling you about now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_additives_in_cigarettes
How about how they don't list ingredients in beer. If they got that going on with the 599 additives in cigarettes, you can assume who knows what is going on with beer.
Health It's time to put cancer warning labels on alcohol, experts say Social Sharing Facebook Twitter Email Reddit LinkedIn No amount of alcohol is safe, says new report from Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction
Ioanna Roumeliotis & Brenda Witmer · CBC News · Posted: Jan 17, 2023 5:00 AM CST | Last Updated: January 17 A person walks past shelves of bottles of alcohol on display. A person walks past shelves of bottles of alcohol on display at an LCBO in Ottawa in this 2020 file photo. The Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA), which released its final report Tuesday, says no amount of alcohol is safe and that consuming any more than two drinks a week is risky. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
6401 comments The pressure on the government to put cancer warning labels on alcohol containers is growing, as experts say the majority of Canadians don't know the risks that come with consuming even moderate amounts.
The latest catalyst is Canada's new Guidance on Alcohol and Health, which updates the 2011 Low Risk Drinking Guidelines. The Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CCSA), which released its final report today, points out that no amount of alcohol is safe and that consuming any more than two drinks a week is risky.
It's a drastic shift from previous guidance, which recommended no more than 15 drinks for men and 10 drinks for women per week to reduce long-term health risks. The CCSA says the new advice reflects thousands of studies in the last decade that link even small amounts of alcohol to several types of cancer.
The new recommendations lay out a continuum of risk. Three-to-six drinks a week increases the risk of developing certain cancers, including colorectal and breast cancer, and more than seven drinks a week also increases your risk of heart disease and stroke. The danger goes up with every additional drink.
Record number of people died from alcohol and drug use during the pandemic: StatsCan Alcohol should have cancer warning labels, say doctors and researchers pushing to raise awareness of risk "The last time we did the guidelines, it was in 2011," said Catherine Paradis, the interim associate director, research, for the CCSA, who co-chaired the scientific expert panel that came up with the new guidance. "In 10 years there's definitely been significant improvements in our understanding of mortality and morbidity associated with alcohol use. We have a much better understanding of the link between alcohol and cancer."
According to the report, many Canadians are already in risky drinking territory, with 17 per cent of Canadians consuming three-to-six drinks a week, while 40 per cent drink more than six drinks a week.
Paradis says the panel spent the last two years combing through nearly 6,000 peer-reviewed studies, including research that now confirms alcohol use as a risk factor for an increasing number of diseases including at least seven types of cancers.
But despite the evidence, most Canadians are unaware or overlook the risk, says Paradis, and many still believe there are health benefits to drinking, though she says the most recent studies show that's not true.
A blonde woman in glasses and a suit jacket smiles at the camera. Catherine Paradis, the interim associate director, research, for the CCSA, who co-chaired the scientific expert panel that came up with the new guidance on alcohol, in pictured in Ottawa in October 2022. (Ousama Farag/CBC) 'People need to be able to count their drinks' Based on its findings, the CCSA is now calling for health warning labels that include the cancer risk on alcohol containers, and labels that inform people of how many standard drinks are in every container.
"Standard drink labels are necessary because people need to be able to count their drinks," said Paradis.
"Labels about the health risk will provide people with that rationale as to why they should follow the guidance."
The CCSA's call for health warning labels, recently echoed by the World Health Organization, is based on research led by Canada. Erin Hobin, a senior scientist with Public Health Ontario, ran one of the only real-world experiments of cancer warning labels on alcohol in Yukon in 2017. The labels were placed on alcohol containers in two government-owned liquor stores for a month.
"What we learned from that study was that the cancer warning grabbed consumer attention," said Hobin. "They read the cancer warning very closely. They thought about that message. They talked to their neighbours and their friends about that message, so there was real deep processing of that message."
People not only talked about the warnings, Hobin said — they drank less, too.
A woman in a dark shirt stand in a lobby, facing the camera Erin Hobin, a senior scientist with Public Health Ontario, ran one of the only real-world experiments of cancer warning labels on alcohol in Yukon in 2017. She's pictured in Ottawa in October 2022. (Ousama Farag/CBC) "Exposing people to cancer warnings on alcohol containers actually is associated with a reduction, a seven per cent reduction in per capita alcohol use compared to sites that were not exposed to the alcohol warning labels," Hobin said, adding the study found increased awareness led to more consumer support for other alcohol policies like higher pricing.
The scientists behind the Yukon cancer label study say it was cut short because the alcohol industry intervened and the Yukon government couldn't afford a potential legal battle. CBC's, The National reached out to the industry to ask where they stand on cancer warning labels now.
Spirits Canada, Wine Growers Canada and Beer Canada responded with statements focusing on drinking responsibly and in moderation.
Wine Growers Canada added it doesn't believe health warning labels are "the best way to effectively educate consumers on the responsible consumption of alcohol." But Beer Canada says it remains "open to labelling suggestions that would be demonstrably helpful to consumers… to reduce harmful drinking."
A legal duty to inform consumers But experts say health warning labels should already be on alcohol containers, because the industry actually has a legal duty to clearly inform consumers of any risks — especially when those risks are not well known.
"They are not just critical, they are required under the law," said Jacob Shelley, the director of the health ethics, law and policy lab at Western University. Shelley, who has worked on alcohol policy, says the obligation for manufacturers to inform consumers of any risks associated with their products is higher when a product is ingested.
A man in a red shirt stands in front of a book shelf Jacob Shelley, the director of the health ethics, law and policy lab at Western University, says the alcohol industry has a legal duty to clearly inform consumers of any risks. (Jacob Shelley) "It's very frustrating, because there is a legal responsibility that's not very difficult, and that the courts have actually identified, that when the product is ingested or consumed, that the duty to warn is actually increased because it poses an increased risk."
Shelley says there's a conflict on the alcohol industry's side, which makes billions in profits every year, to provide cancer-warning labels.
"There's money to be made by increasing consumption," said Shelley.
Shelley says the normalization of alcohol in society may be contributing to a lack of political will to mandate health risk labeling, but he says government action is needed.
More than 6 drinks a week leads to higher health risks, new report suggests — especially for women Alcoholic beverages need labels with calorie counts, Manitoba group says "We have governments regulating all sorts of products to ensure they're safe, from baby cribs to cars, right? And so the government really ought to be more involved in requiring these types of labels, and can justify that requirement by saying that this is an obligation that manufacturers already have."
CBC's The National reached out to Health Canada, which partly funded the CCSA's new drinking guidance. In an email, the agency said it recognizes "alcohol use presents a significant public health and safety issue that affects individuals and communities across Canada," adding, "we look forward to receiving the updated guidance developed by the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction and reviewing any recommendations."
Public support may be growing. According to the Canadian Cancer Society, a survey they led in February 2022 found that eight out of 10 Canadians support adding warning labels or health messaging on alcohol containers.
WATCH | Breaking down the latest information on alcohol:
Is your drinking risky? Why there’s a big push for warning labels 1 day ago Duration9:57 There’s overwhelming evidence that alcohol causes cancer, and yet most people are unaware of the risks that come with drinking even a small amount. CBC’s Ioanna Roumeliotis breaks down the latest information and the growing push for mandatory warning labels. 'I just didn't know' As efforts to educate Canadians about the risk grow, the political pressure is heating up, too.
"The thing that stands out most to me is the amount of people who have said, you know, I just didn't know, I didn't know that alcohol was a Class 1 carcinogen," said Lisa Marie Barron, a New Democrat MP from Nanaimo, B.C.
"If they don't have that information, how can they best make the decisions that fit them? I had somebody tell me, you know what, I might second guess that second drink."
Barron forwarded a motion in the House of Commons last June calling for a national warning label strategy. Drinking has been glamorized, she says, but her past work in addictions exposed her to how harmful the effects can be. Ottawa, not the industry, should dictate what Canadians know, Barron said.
Canadian Cancer Society's 'Dry Feb' campaign urges Canadians to stop drinking, lower their cancer risk Why some women are pushing back against alcohol and the wine-to-unwind culture "Right now it's left to the industry to decide what Canadians should or shouldn't know on the bottles," Barron said, adding her bill could help move the labelling conversation forward. "I'm trying to turn that around and say it's federal responsibility to ensure that Canadians have this information, and here's one tool for us to be able to get that moving forward."
And the pressure is heating up on another political front too. Senator Patrick Brazeau, a non-affiliated senator from Quebec, introduced a bill in the senate last fall proposing an amendment to the Food and Drug Act to require what he calls "honest labelling."
Brazeau says his own experience with addiction was a devastating lesson.
"I know that alcohol causes a lot of hurt," he said, "and this is just my way of trying to give back."
A man in a blue suit with long hair pulled back is pictured standing in an office Sen. Patrick Brazeau is pictured in Ottawa in October 2022. He introduced a bill in the senate last fall proposing an amendment to the Food and Drug Act to require what he calls 'honest labelling.' (Ousama Farag/CBC) It's up to Ottawa to lead the charge for all Canadians, Brazeau said.
"If they're serious about following science, well here's the science. Alcohol causes at least seven types of cancer and now it's up to the federal government to be bold. To take a strong stance and have the moral courage to say exactly that."
Brazeau says no matter how much opposition he faces, he's in it for the long-haul — whether it takes months, years or even a new government.
"I know that the industry is very powerful and they have a lot of resources," he said.
"But you know this is not a fight against the industry, it's a fight against cancer and this is a fight that I'm willing to take on."
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News Corrections and clarifications|Submit a news tip|Report error
Wyoming Moves To Ban Sales Of New Electric Vehicles By 2035 Story by Tom Moloughney • Yesterday 7:47 p.m.
The bizarre resolution is most likely nothing more than a cry for help. Change is hard. Humans are creatures of habit and it's in our nature to avoid change. Transitioning our personal transportation fleet from vehicles that burn fossil fuels to plug in electric vehicles is going to be a massive undertaking.
And as with all new disruptive technologies, there will be winners and losers as the old tech is shuttered while the new technology proliferates. The oil and gas industry already knows that electric vehicles are poised to replace the internal combustion engine vehicles that it caters to, and the demand for its products will radically decrease in the coming years.
But that doesn't mean they aren't going down without a fight.
Ford F-150 Lightning at Electrify America fast charging station Ford F-150 Lightning at Electrify America fast charging station © InsideEVs Wyoming, for instance, just introduced legislation with the hopes of phasing out the sale of electric vehicles in the state by 2035. The legislation sponsor, Sen. Jim Anderson, R-Casper, told Cowboy State Daily the reason he introduced the resolution was "to push back against bans on new sales of cars with internal combustion engines in states like California and New York."
"WHEREAS, the United States has consistently invested in the oil and gas industry to sustain gas-powered vehicles, and that investment has resulted in the continued employment of thousands of people in the oil and gas industry in Wyoming and throughout the country..." - Phasing Out New Electric Vehicle Sales By 2035 The resolution titled “Phasing Out New Electric Vehicle Sales By 2035” was introduced this past Friday, and already has strong support from members of the Wyoming House of Representatives and Senate.
However, as with everything, the devil is always in the details. Once you read through the resolution and get to sections one and two at the bottom, you can see this is more of a symbolic gesture than an outright ban. See below:
Section 1. That the legislature encourages and expresses as a goal that the sale of new electric vehicles in the state of Wyoming be phased out by 2035. Section 2. That the legislature encourages Wyoming's industries and citizens to limit the sale and purchase of new electric vehicles in Wyoming with a goal of phasing out the sale of new electric vehicles in Wyoming by 2035. Related video: WION Climate Tracker: Lithium batteries reveal dark side of our electric fortune (WION)
WION Climate Tracker: Lithium batteries reveal dark side of our electric fortune The resolution is basically encouraging Wyoming residents and businesses to not buy or sell electric vehicles with the goal of eliminating them completely by 2035. But why? Why does Wyoming care if people switch to electric vehicles?
Dramatic sky over two oil pumpjacks in rural Alberta Canada Dramatic sky over two oil pumpjacks in rural Alberta Canada © InsideEVs Wyoming cares because it is an oil & gas state. Even though Wyoming is the least populated state in the nation with only a little more than half a million residents (0.17% of the US population), it is the eight-largest oil producer in the US.
The resolution literally spells out how the oil and gas industry employs thousands of Wyoming residents and that the transition to electric vehicles threatens their continued employment. Reading through the document, one can feel the anxiety that the sponsors have about the electric future.
More Electric Vehicle News US: BEV Segment Is Dominated By US-Made Models US: Ford Tripled BEV Sales In December, Doubled In 2022 It also predicts an impending disaster because: "...the critical minerals used in electric batteries are not easily recyclable or disposable, meaning that municipal landfills in Wyoming and elsewhere will be required to develop practices to dispose of these minerals in a safe and responsible manner."
Transport of a battery system for recycling Transport of a battery system for recycling © Provided by Inside EVs Volkswagen battery being transported for recycling
Elevator Shoes For Men - Get 5-15CM Taller Instantly - Free Shipping Ad chamaripashoes.com Elevator Shoes For Men - Get 5-15CM Taller Instantly - Free Shipping It is true that eventually, EV batteries will need to be replaced and disposed of once they are at the end of life, but the minerals used in EV batteries are valuable and won't end up in landfill, they will be recycled. As much as 90% of today's EV batteries are made to be recycled, and there are companies being established across the globe to handle that task.
This resolution may be more tongue-in-check than a serious piece of legislation, but it brings light to a serious issue for Wyoming. Electric vehicles are coming. It really doesn't matter whether or not states ban internal combustion vehicles because, in 10 to 15 years' time, very few people will want to buy one - and that includes most Wyoming residents.
Instead of trying to fight the inevitable, Wyoming needs to begin to plan for an economic future that relies more heavily on other industries. They know they have to, and perhaps this stunt was really designed to get the attention of those in the federal government that can help with that.
Source: Cowboy State Daily
Whoever it is.. they work at that page full time. Normal people are busy with jobs. I know how it goes with these guys.. it's him.
This was from a Marina Abramovic event.
http://web.archive.org/web/20161209032241/https://sli.mg/a/mdv0hG
not smoking nothing this weekend
He's so fuckin hilarious eh.. it's like the big wheel.. what are we gonna do this year.. place your bets.. I say.. real nuke even though the aliens messed with their silos in the 70's.
So he's 84.. doesn't give a fuck.. lol. he's funny as fuck though. And the work he puts into these pics.. and the video editing. Trust me.. I've scoured the world.. Spent a couple years joking around with celebs on myspace in 2006.. in private rooms. I know celebs and when it's the real them. ok.. the biggest thing is the service to self, for the lucifer soul group and how they're snooty. Klaus though eh.. born in 38.. so picture.. well check the all star team high school class birth year..
https://www.famousbirthdays.com/year/1938.html
So he's in there with these guys.. even number birth years are loser classes who aren't paradigm shifters.. they do school.. politics.. aren't good at sports.. lol. Yeah this class is a loser year.. but fuck man.. nike guy eh.. phil knight.. yeah this class is as bad as like a 1980 compared to powerhouse 81. lol.
But yeah.. klaus.. he founded the WEC eh.. haha.. he's funny as fuck and not snooty..
When he got busted was my home page feed last week.. older pic he posted of himself then it got removed.
Watch for tiny cracks in the marble. Previous profile of funturistic from a couple years I had posted some cracks.. but fucking mods on here sacking shit.. deleted profile. Lengthy post earlier got edited and sacked.. so keep that shit up I'm out again for good.
Not all of those are public. Some rich bitches in there that won't let you in.
Saw this while browsing Beverly Hills. Saved video file.
"
newfunturistic
OP
1 points
2 minutes ago
Content has been removed by this community's moderators."
I'm out.
Testing out skipthedishes alcohol delivery from this beer store like not even 2 blocks away. lol. But if you go in they got glass and can't see all the types they got in the coolers. So online delivery you can choose more. Scrolling down eh.. they have everything on one page.. Several weeks ago was testing out like more mainstream.. like what.. I don't know.. more common name brands.. like what was there.. smirnoff and snapple with liquor, eh.
The other weekend, testing out 2L like ciders but some of those are big coolers. Local stuff too.. those can be bad.
This time.. resuming the long scroll.. lemme get this beer vendor here.
https://www.skipthedishes.com/grand-royal-legacy
Yeah.. so you just scroll down. Had these so far.. I don't know man.. lol.. had that hectors hard peach punch too but not in pics.. local.. from fort garry brewing. That was more "normal" ingrendients where it's not this fuckin blatant literal poison thrown in there.. hahaha. Cabal shit eh.. this mainstream stuff.
Anyways.. gonna keep going here. lol.