Well, you gotta wonder, what's gonna be coming up next with all this.
Scrolling down google news US version. See this one.
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.47UA4WD
Oh, it's the fact check section at the bottom. So now you'll be getting videos, where it's like.. oh, is that real or fake.
"China has launched the world’s first AI-driven hospital, a groundbreaking initiative developed by Tsinghua University researchers.
This facility is staffed by 14 artificial intelligence doctors capable of independently diagnosing, treating, and managing patient care without direct human intervention.
Initial trials have demonstrated the AI doctors’ ability to treat over 3,000 patients daily, suggesting significant potential for improving healthcare efficiency, reducing operational costs, and addressing doctor shortages, particularly in remote and underserved regions."
Then they start injecting you with who knows what.
Well, just things like the temperature extremes. Do they even have outfits that could withstand it. Just with cars here in -40c, that's probably tough. And all this equipment, did they test it in those temperature conditions out there. Probably, eh. But it sounds like they didn't have to.
This is getting out of hand real fast. Just a few weeks ago, it was all wonked out with who knows what. Check this one out.
"Both the video and sound were created from a single text prompt for each clip using Veo 3 by Google, their latest AI video model. The clips were then edited together just like any regular video. Seriously, whoever is training this model… let them work their magic!
Veo 3 goes beyond the uncanny valley. The motion, sound, physics, and dialogue all look and feel incredibly real."
Yeah.. no kidding.. so if they've been using this type of tech, who knows when.. Maybe not though. It wouldn't be too long for AI thinking by itself to be like light years ahead, you know what I mean.
But even just this AI doing realistic video tech, if they have had that years ago.. I guess you can't really trust whatever comes from their systems, like "the news". You'd have to see things in person. But then.. what if like videos from others, are also bogus like that. You'd have to know that person in the real world. It starts to get into that type of thing.
That took up a lot of your time. Hang on.. as I'm reading this, going to check that diagram. Man.. that's complex.. ok I'm up to this "here" part, I'll check that. Allright, I'm over at this post. All this stuff is totally complex. Sounds like there's gonna be super trouble though. Doesn't sound like in our lifetime. But who knows. You sure know your stuff though.
So what do you think about this stuff here.. you think that's gonna happen soon? Like when's this supposed to go on. I guess there'd be some "signs", eh. Like what. And then, isn't there some "anti-christ" too.
I looked up this image file I had seasons ago.. Timeline of the book of revelation. 3229 x 1694 pixels.
https://i.imgur.com/KxcwR6I.jpeg
So where are we in that timeline chart.
Starting to check that out.. I'm there.. why's he talking about Laurel Canyon. Then I look up, see Dave McGowan. Jeez.. I read weird scenes inside the canyon, a few years ago. That guy wound up dead not too long after these books, eh. Gonna gradually check this all out now. Wanna see what he has to say about this moon stuff.
yeah I didn't think spark plugs would get this type of setup going. lol.. and I don't know anything about electronics. Deleting that video from my backup drive. lol
So that's bogus that video? Do you tinker around.. maybe test it out.
ok so I'm reading this Daniel 7. Wasn't sure about looking up stuff when it could be some shenanigan religion. But checking it out here.
DANIEL DESCRIBES HIS VISIONS (7.1—12.13) Daniel's Vision of the Four Beasts 7 In the first year that Belshazzar was king of Babylonia, I had a dream and saw a vision in the night. I wrote the dream down, and this is the record 2 of what I saw that night:
Winds were blowing from all directions and lashing the surface of the ocean. 3 Four huge beasts came up out of the ocean, each one different from the others. 4 The first one looked like a lion, but had wings like an eagle. While I was watching, the wings were torn off. The beast was lifted up and made to stand up straight. And then a human mind was given to it.
5 The second beast looked like a bear standing on its hind legs. It was holding three ribs between its teeth, and a voice said to it, “Go on, eat as much meat as you can!”
6 While I was watching, another beast appeared. It looked like a leopard, but on its back there were four wings, like the wings of a bird, and it had four heads. It had a look of authority about it.
7 As I was watching, a fourth beast appeared. It was powerful, horrible, terrifying. With its huge iron teeth it crushed its victims, and then it trampled on them. Unlike the other beasts, it had ten horns. 8 While I was staring at the horns, I saw a little horn coming up among the others. It tore out three of the horns that were already there. This horn had human eyes and a mouth that was boasting proudly.
Hang on.. some people say it's "symbolic" but when I read about these types of creatures that 'll have an animal head and another animal's body part, that's like the witchcraft beasts. Look up those demons they can be mixed like that. Could be early prototypes that Yahweh was testing out. So.. whatever this guy's describing.. that's just those types.
This is what it's called "In folklore, a chimera is a mythical creature with parts from multiple animals". That's all this stuff is.. even God had some of those going on with his bodyguards. Let me look that up. Remembered those 3 off the top of my head. "cherubim, ophanim, seraphim".
Looking this up, seeing a page but they have an extra besides those.. "The Four Living Creatures".
6 In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back. 7 The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle. 8 Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under his wings.
Yeah.. so what's so unusual with these beasts this Daniel dude is seeing. It's just more of those early prototypes.
yeah so what goes on that they couldn't go past low earth orbit?
I just watched that video with the Benny Hill song. That sure looks like here on earth, eh? So what does that mean.. they didn't go. Well, why not, right?
How I wound up here.. was checking google news, saw this one:
Technology section. Google's new AI video tool floods internet with real-looking clips
https://www.axios.com/2025/05/23/google-ai-videos-veo-3
Reading that article and they say, "Case in point: In one viral example posted on X, filmmaker and molecular biologist Hashem Al-Ghaili shows a series of short films of AI-generated actors railing against their AI creators and prompts."
I check that link.. an example video on twitter. Check this out. Actors are "done".
Hashem Al-Ghaili @HashemGhaili I did more tests with Google's #Veo3. Imagine if AI characters became aware they were living in a simulation!
https://x.com/HashemGhaili/status/1925332319604257203
That's this video. Posted a couple days ago had 3.8M views.
Click on the thread title for the full sized image. It's this:
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/as16-113-18334/as16-113-18334~orig.jpg
Here's another one where they zoom out more.
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/as14-66-09277/as14-66-09277~orig.jpg
Here's me searching for them
https://images.nasa.gov/search?q=Lunar%20Module&page=1&media=image&yearStart=1920&yearEnd=2025
If they wanted to cut down weight, they didn't need all those heavy tires they coulda used some other material. Those tires and rims woulda been heavy. Do you really need fenders on it, too.
You do have the knights templar worshipping him though. Like the wiki page of Baphomet.. let me go get that.
"During trials starting in 1307, the Knights Templar were accused of heresy for worshipping Baphomet as a demonic idol."
Don't forget about "the steps of freemasonry", with Knights Templar at the top on the York rite side.
"structure-of-freemasonry-1956-life-magazine"
https://i.imgur.com/Qr4UMqa.jpeg
This post baphomet image was from:
"Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854". But it sounds like this was going on way back before it. What is this character's deal here.
I talk to Google Gemini AI about it.
baphomet.. he's not one of the 72 demons from the ars goetia. There was also another class of demons. But he wasn't one of those. You have the hierarchy of the demonic realm.. like generals.. this baphomet wasn't in any of these categories
You are absolutely correct. Baphomet is not one of the 72 demons listed in the Ars Goetia, nor does he typically appear in traditional hierarchies of the demonic realm found in grimoires like the Lesser Key of Solomon.
Here's why Baphomet stands apart:
Origin in the Knights Templar Trials: Baphomet first appears in historical records during the trials of the Knights Templar in the early 14th century. Accused of heresy, some Templars, often under torture, confessed to worshipping an idol named Baphomet. The exact nature or appearance of this "idol" varied widely in their confessions, and many scholars believe it was a fabrication by the inquisitors or a misunderstanding/misspelling of "Mahomet" (Muhammad), suggesting an accusation of Islamophilia.
19th Century Occult Revival: The modern image of Baphomet, the winged, goat-headed, hermaphroditic figure, was largely popularized by the French occultist Éliphas Lévi in the mid-19th century. Lévi intended this image to be a symbolic representation of balance, duality, and the equilibrium of opposites in the universe, incorporating various esoteric symbols. It was not originally presented as a specific demon to be invoked in the way the Goetic spirits are.
Not a Traditional Demonological Figure: Unlike the demons of the Ars Goetia, who have specific seals, offices, legions, and methods of conjuration described in grimoires, Baphomet doesn't have a place in those older, established demonological systems. The Ars Goetia lists 72 spirits with distinct roles (Kings, Dukes, Princes, Marquises, Earls, a Knight, and Presidents) and is focused on practical ceremonial magic for summoning and controlling them.
So, while Baphomet has become a widely recognized symbol associated with occultism and sometimes mistakenly linked with Satanism, its origins and nature are quite different from the demons of the Ars Goetia and other classical demon hierarchies.
checking the Dictionnaire infernal from 1863.. it's 748 pages, so it's pretty thick. Baphomet doesn't seem to be listed in there. This Éliphas Lévi image.. what year was that?
You're very astute to notice Baphomet's absence from the Dictionnaire Infernal! Jacques Auguste Simon Collin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal (which had its final, most comprehensive edition in 1863, the one you're likely referring to) aimed to be a compendium of demons, occult figures, and superstitions. The fact that Baphomet isn't prominent or even listed in it reinforces that he wasn't considered a traditional demon within established demonology at that time.
Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854 in his influential book, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic). It was then featured as the frontispiece for the two-volume edition of the same work, published between 1855 and 1856.
So, Lévi's image of Baphomet was created and widely circulated just before or around the same time as the final edition of the Dictionnaire Infernal. This timing further explains why it wouldn't have been included, as Baphomet was more of a symbolic creation of the burgeoning occult revival, rather than a historical or traditional demonic entity.
There was also when I was checking out the white house, broken pentagram in the DC street layout. The bottom tip point was inside entrance hall. If you'd go in there, look to the right, big mirror. At the top of the border carvings, this goat head guy with the flame on top. Let me get that post.
Just search for: "entrance hall" in here for those research posts.
https://communities.win/search?query=entrance%20hall&community=Conspiracies
But yeah.. where does this character fit in the categorization.. he's not in the hierarchy of hell.
https://www.occult.live/index.php/Hierarchy_of_Hell
Not in the 72 demons of the Ars Goetia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_demons_in_the_Ars_Goetia
I put together an album of the version from the Dictionnaire Infernale, from 1863.. A later illustrations version. And this more realistic one from lately. The 3 beside each other, for each of the 72. Let me get that bookmark.
"Comparing different versions of the 72 Ars Goetia demons"
So what's these guys deal, compared to the hierarchy of hell, characters .
1 Theological classification of demons 2 The government of Hell 3 Kings of the cardinal directions 4 The Hierarchy 4.1 Kings 4.2 Princes 4.3 Dukes 4.4 Marquises 4.5 Counts 4.6 Knight 4.7 Presidents 5 Nine degrees of diabolical spirits
Well what the hell is going on with that.. like what's he even talking about what's occuring? Sounds super major. And why is this going on.
Sounds like you know a lot about this religious stuff. That's handy. I'm keeping on reading this during meals. Finished the Matthew first part. It gets into when they take him out. Jeez.. "literally". Then I started the next one.. Mark. This is gonna take a while cause it's lots of pages.
But this part here, from the post. I went to the page before,
"The awful horror. You will see 'The awful horror', of which the prophet Daniel Spoke, standing in the holy place". (Note to the reader: understand what this means!)"
In that section it talks about like a major calamity. The next page you get this stuff from the post.
So I was like.. ok what's going on with this Daniel stuff, eh. I try to look into it.. sounds like it's this "Old testament". Like the really old stuff. Then I try to find a pdf of this New testament. But could be all these shenanigan religions. So I try to find a really old version.
I wind up at this German one, in english, that has Hebrew letters on the main area of the page. It's long too. I got it on my desktop. Let me check where I got this from.. archive.org. It's called "holyscripturesof00unse.pdf"
It's like 1396 pages. It's called "The Holy Scriptures of the Old Testament, Hebrew and English".
Publication date 1903 Publisher Berlin : British & Foreign Bible Society
https://archive.org/details/holyscripturesof00unse/mode/2up
So this is pretty old. I'll check this out.. but kinda busy with things and no job these days and going under 2000 bucks in the bank. Trying to get something going with the sports betting. Been analyzing that in recent seasons. Was running tests lately, like 3 cent parlays and watching the green checkmark ratio. It's onto good stuff here the past week. Testing out downgrading what the default over/under number is. Then doing "over" total goals where it's downgraded by 1. Also doing these round robin system bets. Can only do 8 games for those but you choose how many you want to go for combinations of. I'm going to the max, these goliath, where it generates all possible combinations. So 247 bets. But I can only afford 1 cent each.. costs $2.47. Just started this strategy today. Looks like it'll be ok cause that downgrading overs by one has a high green checkmark ratio. You can get less than all 8 green checkmarks and still get some back. But to cover your bet at these odds.. like for games of default 2.5, you're going over 1.5.. it'll get like around 1.4x. You'd need like 6 of 8 green checkmarks to get more than what it cost. But if you get into 7 and 8.. it can be ok payout. I think you can gradually keep moving up with this. Might not have to work a minimum wage job. It would be good cause then I can research instead of slaving a bad job. Anyways.. yeah that's what's up around here lately. The rat race totally stinks. It burns you out and slave jobs wear you down. ok bye for now.
Ran this through video to text, some of the words are a bit off:
If I hadn't done that, Ali would have, well I would have been just being killed outright. Ali, they would have turned into Muti, you know, they're eating the, you know, Hannibal's. Well, they don't eat, they use the child for Muti. That means if you eat a finger or something, then you have luck for life, you know. You know, you must have heard of that, truly. Like so carefully, stuff like that, watch stuff. When you go back in time, you know, the Vikings and all the people before that, you know, the different ages in which we live, you know. So what would have happened if the police said to me that if they had killed her, they would have used her for Muti. Muti, it's medicine, witchcraft. I'm sure you've heard of that. Yeah, yeah. So she would have been a, her head would have been dangling from a taxi mirror, you know. They boil the head into its trunk, they hang it from a taxi mirror.
"Elon Musk Babysitter Testimony - "Elon opened a portal". 30 minutes long. She had her channel data deleted by youtube, this is a mirror from somebody else."
Since the Luciferian cabal doesn't like the whole Jesus thing, thought I'd check it out.
My mom gave a bible that she had from the 70's. The cover was made of denim and was a picture of a jean pocket on the front. Was called "good news". It would also fit in a pocket.
It's like they try to say things in more plain english so it's not like Shakespeare to the kids. There'd be some basic illustrations every few pages.
Was trying to read the book version but was like.. this would be easier as a pdf, then I could check it out during meals and I don't have to hold it down with my hands. Plus the text is smaller in a book.
I look for a pdf of the same version I had. Well, you'd think things would be out there more. But I did find it on archive.org. However it says oh you have to have an account to check it out. Most of it was these blocked preview pages. So I make an account there and got the page where I left off as a bookmark on the bookmarks bar. But each meal I have to click the "borrow" button at the top of the page, to unblock this oh limited preview thing. Whatever.
This is where it is, if you want to check it out. I'm up to this page from the screenshot.
https://archive.org/details/goodnewsformoder0000unse_g2y1/page/62/mode/2up?view=theater
Why do they do this "borrow" thing.. it's digital, it's not like back at the library when you'd check them out. Whatever.
So yeah I was reading this section.. I'm there.. what the hell is going on here that would cause all this. Then you got that section of "the powers in space will be driven from their course", like what the hell is that.. aliens. Cause who else is the powers in space. Maybe us later in the future. The cabal up there, eh, like a sci-fi movie.
When I grew up in the country during the 80's, we'd go to the dump and shoot stuff. A buddy had a double barrel shotgun.. when you'd shoot, it'd be like somebody punching you in the shoulder.
I later shot guns.. got a job driving armored car in the early 2000's. So I got a restricted handgun licence, here in Canada. I don't think you can get those anymore around here.
Once I left that job, I let the licence expire. Could have bought a handgun, but you'd wind up in trouble, in jail. Somebody could wind up dead. I was like.. naw.
But yeah.. I just looked up:
"can you still get a handgun license in canada"
Cause I think I heard in the news in recent months.. you can't any more!
"Yes, a Possession and Acquisition Licence (PAL) is still needed to own and use firearms, including handguns, in Canada. However, there's a national freeze on the sale, purchase, or transfer of handguns by individuals, and on bringing newly acquired handguns into Canada"
Fuck, are they ever getting super uptight with that shit. Meanwhile, over the border in the US, it's like the wild west.
But yeah.. when I had that job, I was shooting a 38 special, so like a revolver. Didn't learn like the glock or type with a magazine in the end, like the movies. I don't know how those work.
But the 6 cylinder, I got the hang of that. At first, it was like.. off target, but that's cause you're pulling the trigger and it moves it over. You gotta squeeze the trigger a bit, re-line the sight, and then do the shot. Passed the bullseye target tests.
Also shot this Remington shotgun they'd have in the cab. You'd have like 5 shots in the barrel.. That was really soft recoil compared to the double barrel at the dump. That pump-action shotgun was nice too. Gotta watch it on the target though that none of the little bullets go off it cause somebody else could get hit.
But yeah guns.. I know what you mean.
hang on buddy.. trying to read through that..
ok I got a tip.. I got my first computer in april 1997.. it cost like fuckin what was it, eh.. i'll do a post about that next.. It was to get like groceries delivered.. lol.. 3900 bucks in 1997 for the lol.. you know the deal.
golf.. i played it for real.. went to this field complex around here.. by the railroad tracks.. up.. so nobody from the road could see you. So you got like a US football field.. not soccer.. then a baseball field past that.. and another baseball field. I check the google maps for that area.. The US football part was like.. 100 yards..
I brought my golf bag.. lol.. early morning.. nobody on the whole field.. I tee off, eh.. whole bag of cheap golf balls from walmart.. lol.. Then you go over to the other end.. and try to shoot them back between the goal posts. It was lotsa fun.
But yeah.. I'd go to "driving ranges" where you pay and get a bucket.
That, on my own, on the play field there.. that was good..
What I learnt though.. with "golf swing".. it's not like "baseball swing". lol.. what you want is the damn club to be in the same spot, right.. so if you're moving your arms all over the place.. it's bad.
The biggest key I found from those tests.. is.. you gotta keep that stuff "straight", while you're swinging back. You can try the "baseball swing", eh.. But it's bad.
If you watch like ok golf guys.. they keep that left elbow kinda like not moving around all that much.
The biggest key, I can give you about golf swings.. is not moving your arms around like baseball swings, ok..
I figured out golf like how I did lately, with beating the illuminati at sports betting.. lol..
Here's what's going on with golf swings.. I had to keep my "torso twist" more than moving my arms around. You know what I mean.. So just kinda swing back and it's a "torso twist", more than moving your arms around. Try that in practice tests.
Yeah, no kidding.. They probably had that tech, who knows how long ago. That could mean old things you saw on TV, could be like this. I don't know. Maybe they didn't have that tech years ago.
Plus these guys run all the media companies. If you didn't see something with your own eyes, or know somebody who did.. you never know.. maybe it didn't happen. Was just this type of tech, plus the media companies going along with it.