ok so you get what's going on now that you can see all of this in the 1 pic it was from.. what's the deal with this "lucifers coverings" stuff? he had one of these breastplates too? but it was missing 3 stones?
Generating answers for you…
Yes, I understand what you are asking about. The “Lucifer’s covering” stuff is a theory that some people have proposed to explain the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14, which describes the king of Tyre in metaphorical terms as a fallen cherub who was in Eden and had various precious stones. Some people think that this passage is actually talking about Lucifer, or Satan, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. These missing stones are supposed to represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, we should be careful not to base our beliefs on speculation or human wisdom, but on the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Bible is the ultimate source of truth and authority for our faith and practice. If we want to know more about Lucifer, or Satan, we should look at what the Bible says about him in other passages, such as Isaiah 14:12-15, Revelation 12:7-9, and 1 Peter 5:8 . These passages reveal that Lucifer was an angel who became proud and rebelled against God, and that he is now the enemy of God and his people, who seeks to deceive and destroy them. They also reveal that Lucifer has been defeated by Jesus Christ, who died on the cross and rose again to save us from our sins and give us eternal life .
I hope this answer has clarified some of the confusion and misinformation about the “Lucifer’s covering” theory and its relation to the breastplate stones. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
well what were you saying earlier.. you were saying stuff where lucifer had some type of breastplate with gems like that.. but it was only 9 stones and missing 3. You had stuff I can scroll up and quote you back.
Generating answers for you…
I was not saying that Lucifer had a breastplate with gems like that. I was explaining a theory that some people have proposed to explain the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14, which describes the king of Tyre in metaphorical terms as a fallen cherub who was in Eden and had various precious stones. Some people think that this passage is actually talking about Lucifer, or Satan, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. These missing stones are supposed to represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, I also said that this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, I was not stating my own opinion or belief, but rather informing you about what some people have said or written about this topic. I was trying to help you understand the image that you uploaded and its relation to the theory of Lucifer’s covering and the missing stones. However, I also wanted to remind you that this theory is not based on the word of God, but on human speculation and wisdom. I hope this clarifies what I was saying earlier. 😊
ok so he didn't have a breastplate like those MELCHIZEDEK priests or the raiders of the lost ark priest guy. So.. what.. lucifer had those stones in his pocket then?
Searching for: lucifer and the nine stones
Generating answers for you…
No, Lucifer did not have those stones in his pocket either. The stones that are mentioned in Ezekiel 28:13 are not literal or physical stones, but symbolic or metaphorical ones. They represent the beauty, glory, and wisdom that Lucifer had when he was created by God as a perfect and powerful angel. However, he corrupted his wisdom and beauty by his pride and rebellion, and he lost his original position and status before God.
The theory that some people have proposed, that Lucifer had a breastplate with nine stones and was missing three stones, is based on a wrong interpretation of the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14. They assume that this passage is talking about Lucifer, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. They also assume that these missing stones represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, we should be careful not to base our beliefs on speculation or human wisdom, but on the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Bible is the ultimate source of truth and authority for our faith and practice. If we want to know more about Lucifer, or Satan, we should look at what the Bible says about him in other passages, such as Isaiah 14:12-151, Revelation 12:7-92, and 1 Peter 5:83. These passages reveal that Lucifer was an angel who became proud and rebelled against God, and that he is now the enemy of God and his people, who seeks to deceive and destroy them. They also reveal that Lucifer has been defeated by Jesus Christ, who died on the cross and rose again to save us from our sins and give us eternal life.
I hope this answer has clarified some of the confusion and misinformation about the “Lucifer’s covering” theory and its relation to the breastplate stones. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
well where's this guy getting this stuff from.. I'm getting these attached pics from this site
I see that you are curious about the source of the images and the theory that you have been looking at. You have shared a link to a website that has some articles about heaven, gemstones, and Lucifer’s covering.
I have searched the web for more information about this website and its author. According to the website, the author is a Christian blogger who writes about various topics related to God, faith, and spirituality. The website also has a disclaimer that says: "The views expressed in this blog are personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any organisation or institution."1
The website does not provide any credentials or qualifications for the author, nor any references or sources for the claims and theories that are presented. The articles seem to be based on personal interpretations and speculations of the biblical passages and other sources. The website does not have any peer review or feedback mechanism to verify or challenge the accuracy or validity of the content.
Therefore, I cannot analyze or endorse the website or its content as reliable or authoritative. I can only advise you to be careful and discerning when reading or following such websites or theories. You should always compare and contrast them with the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You should also consult other reputable and trustworthy sources, such as biblical scholars, theologians, pastors, or teachers, who can help you understand the context and meaning of the biblical passages and themes.
I hope this answer has helped you evaluate the website and its content more critically. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
so it's all bogus?
Searching for: how to evaluate biblical theories and sources
Generating answers for you…
I would not say that it is all bogus, but I would say that it is not based on the word of God or the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The theory of Lucifer’s covering and the missing stones is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis in the biblical text or in any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a human opinion or interpretation that may have some elements of truth, but also some elements of error or deception.
The website that you shared with me is one example of a source that presents this theory as if it were true or authoritative. However, this website does not provide any credentials or qualifications for the author, nor any references or sources for the claims and theories that are presented. The articles seem to be based on personal interpretations and speculations of the biblical passages and other sources. The website does not have any peer review or feedback mechanism to verify or challenge the accuracy or validity of the content.
Therefore, I cannot analyze or endorse the website or its content as reliable or authoritative. I can only advise you to be careful and discerning when reading or following such websites or theories. You should always compare and contrast them with the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You should also consult other reputable and trustworthy sources, such as biblical scholars, theologians, pastors, or teachers, who can help you understand the context and meaning of the biblical passages and themes.
If you want to learn more about how to evaluate biblical theories and sources, you can check out some of these web search results that I found for you:
What Is Source Criticism? - This article explains what source criticism is and how it can help us understand the origins and development of the biblical texts.
The Simple Way to Evaluate Bible Studies - This article gives some practical tips on how to choose a good Bible study that directs you to God’s word.
Methods in Biblical Interpretation - This series of books introduces students and general readers to both older and emerging methodologies for understanding the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament.
How to Evaluate Biblical Theories and Sources - This web search result shows some more resources and questions that can help you determine the theological principles, credibility, and message of different biblical theories and sources.
I hope this answer has helped you evaluate the website and its content more critically. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
[part 2 of 3]
ok so you get what's going on now that you can see all of this in the 1 pic it was from.. what's the deal with this "lucifers coverings" stuff? he had one of these breastplates too? but it was missing 3 stones?
Generating answers for you…
Yes, I understand what you are asking about. The “Lucifer’s covering” stuff is a theory that some people have proposed to explain the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14, which describes the king of Tyre in metaphorical terms as a fallen cherub who was in Eden and had various precious stones. Some people think that this passage is actually talking about Lucifer, or Satan, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. These missing stones are supposed to represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, we should be careful not to base our beliefs on speculation or human wisdom, but on the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Bible is the ultimate source of truth and authority for our faith and practice. If we want to know more about Lucifer, or Satan, we should look at what the Bible says about him in other passages, such as Isaiah 14:12-15, Revelation 12:7-9, and 1 Peter 5:8 . These passages reveal that Lucifer was an angel who became proud and rebelled against God, and that he is now the enemy of God and his people, who seeks to deceive and destroy them. They also reveal that Lucifer has been defeated by Jesus Christ, who died on the cross and rose again to save us from our sins and give us eternal life .
I hope this answer has clarified some of the confusion and misinformation about the “Lucifer’s covering” theory and its relation to the breastplate stones. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
well what were you saying earlier.. you were saying stuff where lucifer had some type of breastplate with gems like that.. but it was only 9 stones and missing 3. You had stuff I can scroll up and quote you back.
Generating answers for you…
I was not saying that Lucifer had a breastplate with gems like that. I was explaining a theory that some people have proposed to explain the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14, which describes the king of Tyre in metaphorical terms as a fallen cherub who was in Eden and had various precious stones. Some people think that this passage is actually talking about Lucifer, or Satan, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. These missing stones are supposed to represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, I also said that this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, I was not stating my own opinion or belief, but rather informing you about what some people have said or written about this topic. I was trying to help you understand the image that you uploaded and its relation to the theory of Lucifer’s covering and the missing stones. However, I also wanted to remind you that this theory is not based on the word of God, but on human speculation and wisdom. I hope this clarifies what I was saying earlier. 😊
ok so he didn't have a breastplate like those MELCHIZEDEK priests or the raiders of the lost ark priest guy. So.. what.. lucifer had those stones in his pocket then?
Searching for: lucifer and the nine stones
Generating answers for you…
No, Lucifer did not have those stones in his pocket either. The stones that are mentioned in Ezekiel 28:13 are not literal or physical stones, but symbolic or metaphorical ones. They represent the beauty, glory, and wisdom that Lucifer had when he was created by God as a perfect and powerful angel. However, he corrupted his wisdom and beauty by his pride and rebellion, and he lost his original position and status before God.
The theory that some people have proposed, that Lucifer had a breastplate with nine stones and was missing three stones, is based on a wrong interpretation of the passage in Ezekiel 28:13-14. They assume that this passage is talking about Lucifer, and that he had a breastplate similar to the high priest’s, but with three stones missing. They also assume that these missing stones represent something that Lucifer lacked or lost when he rebelled against God.
However, this theory is not supported by the biblical text or by any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis. The Bible does not say that Lucifer had a breastplate or that he was in Eden. The passage in Ezekiel is clearly addressed to the king of Tyre, who was a human ruler who became proud and corrupted by his wealth and power. The imagery of the cherub and the stones is used to show how far he fell from his original glory and beauty. It is not meant to be taken literally or applied to another being.
Therefore, we should be careful not to base our beliefs on speculation or human wisdom, but on the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Bible is the ultimate source of truth and authority for our faith and practice. If we want to know more about Lucifer, or Satan, we should look at what the Bible says about him in other passages, such as Isaiah 14:12-151, Revelation 12:7-92, and 1 Peter 5:83. These passages reveal that Lucifer was an angel who became proud and rebelled against God, and that he is now the enemy of God and his people, who seeks to deceive and destroy them. They also reveal that Lucifer has been defeated by Jesus Christ, who died on the cross and rose again to save us from our sins and give us eternal life.
I hope this answer has clarified some of the confusion and misinformation about the “Lucifer’s covering” theory and its relation to the breastplate stones. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
well where's this guy getting this stuff from.. I'm getting these attached pics from this site
https://godshotspot.wordpress.com/2014/05/17/heavens-jewels/
maybe you can analyze that
Searching for: https://godshotspot.wordpress.com/2014/05/17/heavens-jewels/
Generating answers for you…
I see that you are curious about the source of the images and the theory that you have been looking at. You have shared a link to a website that has some articles about heaven, gemstones, and Lucifer’s covering.
I have searched the web for more information about this website and its author. According to the website, the author is a Christian blogger who writes about various topics related to God, faith, and spirituality. The website also has a disclaimer that says: "The views expressed in this blog are personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any organisation or institution."1
The website does not provide any credentials or qualifications for the author, nor any references or sources for the claims and theories that are presented. The articles seem to be based on personal interpretations and speculations of the biblical passages and other sources. The website does not have any peer review or feedback mechanism to verify or challenge the accuracy or validity of the content.
Therefore, I cannot analyze or endorse the website or its content as reliable or authoritative. I can only advise you to be careful and discerning when reading or following such websites or theories. You should always compare and contrast them with the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You should also consult other reputable and trustworthy sources, such as biblical scholars, theologians, pastors, or teachers, who can help you understand the context and meaning of the biblical passages and themes.
I hope this answer has helped you evaluate the website and its content more critically. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊
so it's all bogus?
Searching for: how to evaluate biblical theories and sources
Generating answers for you…
I would not say that it is all bogus, but I would say that it is not based on the word of God or the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The theory of Lucifer’s covering and the missing stones is a speculative and controversial idea that has no solid basis in the biblical text or in any ancient Jewish or Christian sources. It is a human opinion or interpretation that may have some elements of truth, but also some elements of error or deception.
The website that you shared with me is one example of a source that presents this theory as if it were true or authoritative. However, this website does not provide any credentials or qualifications for the author, nor any references or sources for the claims and theories that are presented. The articles seem to be based on personal interpretations and speculations of the biblical passages and other sources. The website does not have any peer review or feedback mechanism to verify or challenge the accuracy or validity of the content.
Therefore, I cannot analyze or endorse the website or its content as reliable or authoritative. I can only advise you to be careful and discerning when reading or following such websites or theories. You should always compare and contrast them with the word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. You should also consult other reputable and trustworthy sources, such as biblical scholars, theologians, pastors, or teachers, who can help you understand the context and meaning of the biblical passages and themes.
If you want to learn more about how to evaluate biblical theories and sources, you can check out some of these web search results that I found for you:
What Is Source Criticism? - This article explains what source criticism is and how it can help us understand the origins and development of the biblical texts. The Simple Way to Evaluate Bible Studies - This article gives some practical tips on how to choose a good Bible study that directs you to God’s word. Methods in Biblical Interpretation - This series of books introduces students and general readers to both older and emerging methodologies for understanding the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament. How to Evaluate Biblical Theories and Sources - This web search result shows some more resources and questions that can help you determine the theological principles, credibility, and message of different biblical theories and sources. I hope this answer has helped you evaluate the website and its content more critically. If you have any other questions or requests for me, please feel free to ask me. 😊