Pasting this in notepad++ to check the text count.. 36k.. so I'll continue in comments once it stops from maxing out, I think it's 15k. Let's see where it stops.

in the gas chamber camps.. how long were people hanging out before they'd go.. oh.. time for them to get gassed. And then you got some people who were in there but got out and got old. Wouldn't they just take 'em all out, real quick. Or was it because of the backlog of how they could only incinerate 4000 a day.

ChatGPT said:

The experiences of people in the gas chambers during the Holocaust were horrifying and varied, but generally, the victims of gassing would have been led to the gas chambers under false pretenses (such as being told they were going for a shower or a disinfection process), and it could take anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours before they were executed. Many times, these people were part of large groups, so the process was quite organized by the Nazis to keep things efficient, even as they carried out mass murder.

To answer your second question, there were a few reasons why some people survived. One key factor was that not everyone who entered the gas chambers died immediately. In some cases, people survived due to mistakes made by the guards or technical failures. For example, gas chambers didn't always work as planned, and the process could take longer than expected. Some people might have been mistakenly taken for dead or not immediately sent to the crematoria, where bodies were incinerated. The capacity of crematoria to process large numbers of bodies was limited; many could only handle a few thousand per day, which meant there could be a backlog, and some bodies were buried instead of cremated.

Additionally, people who were sent to work camps (such as in Auschwitz) sometimes survived by working under brutal conditions, even though they were originally meant to be killed. The sheer scale of the extermination effort and logistical problems in some camps allowed for certain survivors, although their numbers were still small compared to the millions who died.

The entire system of concentration and extermination camps was designed for maximum efficiency in mass murder, but it was still a brutal and often chaotic process with many variables that determined who lived and who died.

You said:

so how long were they hanging out before they got incinerated?

ChatGPT said:

The time it took for victims to be incinerated after they were gassed in the Nazi concentration camps varied, but typically, after people were murdered in the gas chambers, the bodies were either left inside the chamber for a short period or removed immediately for cremation.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

After being gassed: Once the victims were dead, the bodies were usually left inside the gas chamber for anywhere from 15 minutes to a few hours, depending on the specific camp and how many people had been killed. The bodies were sometimes removed from the chamber in large batches, particularly in the larger camps where many people were executed in one day.

Cremation: After removal from the gas chamber, the bodies were sent to crematoria. The incineration process could take several hours for each batch, depending on the capacity of the crematoria. Some of the larger camps, like Auschwitz-Birkenau, had multiple cremation ovens and could process around 4,000 bodies per day, but that was still a bottleneck considering the volume of people arriving.

Burial and other methods: In cases where crematoria were overwhelmed or broken down, bodies were sometimes buried in mass graves or burned in open pits. In some cases, the backlog of bodies would lead to delays, and people would be left lying around for longer periods.

The overall process could take a few hours from death to disposal, though the logistics were often very rushed and chaotic. The Nazis had a very calculated system for mass extermination, but it was still under strain due to the sheer number of victims.

You said:

no i mean in the camp.. before they were next in line to get gassed and incinerated.. was it because of this backlog of how they could only incinerate 4000 a day?

ChatGPT said:

Ah, I see what you're asking now. You're wondering about the time people spent in the camps before they were selected for the gas chambers, not after. And yes, the bottleneck in cremation capacity did affect the timing of how quickly people were killed.

Here’s a breakdown:

Arrival and selection: Upon arrival at camps like Auschwitz, prisoners were often immediately separated by the Nazis into two groups: those deemed fit for forced labor (typically healthy adults) and those deemed unfit (the elderly, children, the sick, or anyone who couldn’t work). The unfit prisoners were often sent directly to the gas chambers.

Backlog and waiting: Because there were so many people arriving in the camps every day, and the cremation capacity was limited (around 4,000 bodies per day in some larger camps), there was indeed a kind of backlog. As a result, people who were selected for extermination could spend days, sometimes weeks, in the camp before being gassed.

Some were held in quarantine barracks or waiting areas, often under horrific conditions, while they awaited their turn to be sent to the gas chambers.

Others, particularly those who might have been temporarily considered for labor, could be kept alive for a longer period before being sent to the gas chambers.

The killing process: Once the victims were selected, they would be led to the gas chambers, often under the pretense that they were going to take a shower or undergo a disinfection process. After being gassed, the bodies would be removed for incineration.

So, yes, the backlog of bodies that needed to be cremated did cause delays in how quickly people were killed, and those selected for extermination might have been forced to wait in squalid conditions before their turn came. The Nazis’ methods of mass murder were designed for efficiency, but as you mentioned, the limited capacity of the crematoria and the sheer number of people arriving each day did create a kind of waiting period before some were executed.

You said:

so they weren't there that long, or what.. like how long was this all going on.. only a couple years during the war, before the war ended?

ChatGPT said:

The period during which the mass exterminations in Nazi concentration and death camps took place lasted for a few years, primarily from 1941 to 1945, though the exact timeline varies depending on the specific camp. The process of gassing and cremating prisoners was part of what’s known as the Final Solution, the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jewish population and other "undesirables."

Here’s a more specific timeline:

Early stages of mass murder (1941-1942):

The gassing operations began in 1941, initially with mobile killing units (the Einsatzgruppen) who carried out mass shootings. However, the Nazis soon transitioned to using gas chambers in fixed locations.

The first purpose-built extermination camp was Chelmno in late 1941, followed by others, like Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka in 1942.

In Auschwitz-Birkenau, where the largest number of people were murdered, the gas chambers became fully operational in 1942. Auschwitz also had large crematoria designed to handle thousands of bodies per day, but they were still overwhelmed by the sheer number of people arriving at the camp.

Scale of extermination (1942-1944):

By 1943 and 1944, the killing operations in places like Auschwitz had reached their peak. The trains carrying people from all over Europe to these death camps were arriving constantly.

In Auschwitz, for instance, the Nazis were killing upwards of 1,000 to 2,000 people a day by 1944, with the daily capacity of crematoria reaching around 4,000 bodies in the larger camps.

During this time, prisoners selected for immediate extermination could spend anywhere from a few hours to several days in holding areas before being killed, depending on the situation and the camp's processing speed.

End of the war (1944-1945):

As the war began to turn against Germany in late 1944 and early 1945, the Nazis attempted to hide the evidence of their crimes. They began evacuating the camps and forced prisoners to march to other locations. Many were killed during these death marches, but some survivors did manage to escape or were liberated as the Allies advanced.

By January 1945, Auschwitz was liberated by the Soviet Red Army, and other camps were liberated by Allied forces later in the year.

So, the mass exterminations—especially those carried out in gas chambers—lasted about three to four years during the war, from 1941 when the method was first used systematically to 1944-1945 when the Allies began to liberate the camps.

While the actual waiting time before someone was gassed varied depending on the camp and individual circumstances, people weren’t generally there for too long, especially if they were part of a mass transport that had just arrived. The Nazis were determined to carry out these killings quickly and efficiently, so the entire process, from arrival to death, could often happen within a few days.

You said:

let's focus on the Auschwitz one.. these people who were there.. but got out.. how long were they in there.. and how come they weren't incinerated?

ChatGPT said:

At Auschwitz-Birkenau, some people did manage to survive the horrors of the gas chambers and the brutal conditions, but their survival stories were often exceptional. Let’s focus on the different ways people survived and why some weren’t immediately incinerated after being sent to the gas chambers.

1. Survival Stories – How Some Managed to Get Out

Mistakes or Delays in the Process: While Auschwitz was notorious for its efficiency in mass murder, the killing process was not flawless. Some people survived due to errors made by the Nazis, either in the gassing process itself or in their identification. A few victims might have been left behind in the gas chambers due to overcrowding, or guards might have been too hasty in their actions and didn’t double-check to ensure everyone was dead. These people sometimes ended up being sent to forced labor camps or used in medical experiments.

The “Selection” Process: When new groups of people arrived at Auschwitz, they were typically divided into two categories: those deemed fit for labor (those sent to work) and those deemed unfit for labor (those sent directly to the gas chambers). If someone was deemed unfit but later looked healthier or appeared to be able to work, they might have been spared temporarily. However, this was a rare occurrence.

"Special Treatment" (Experiments and Labor): Some prisoners, particularly those who were subjected to medical experiments or used as labor, were spared from the gas chambers for a time. These people often lived in extremely harsh conditions, but they were not immediately killed. Dr. Josef Mengele, infamous for conducting cruel medical experiments, selected some people to experiment on instead of sending them to the gas chambers.

2. Why Were Some Not Incinerated After Being Gassed?

Technical Failures or Mistakes: Some of the gas chambers and crematoria at Auschwitz were not always fully operational due to technical problems or the sheer volume of people being killed. As a result, there were instances where bodies weren't incinerated immediately, and some people might have been mistakenly thought to be dead, then taken out alive.

The Delayed Process of Cremation: Even though Auschwitz was equipped with large crematoria, the sheer number of people arriving in the camp made it difficult to immediately incinerate all the bodies. With capacity to incinerate around 4,000 bodies a day (spread across multiple crematoria), the cremation process was sometimes slow, and there could be a backlog. This meant that, in some cases, corpses were buried or left to decompose for a period before being cremated.

Survivors of the Gassing Process: Some people did survive the initial gassing, especially if they were exposed to the gas for a shorter amount of time, or if the gas chamber wasn't fully airtight. Those who did survive often faced an extremely brutal aftermath—some were immediately sent to forced labor, while others were subjected to horrific medical experiments. In rare cases, these survivors managed to escape, or they were liberated later by Allied forces.

3. Time in the Camp

How Long Were They in the Camp? For those who survived the initial gassing or the extreme conditions, their time in Auschwitz could range from a few days to several months. Those selected for labor could be forced to work under appalling conditions, often in labor camps that were connected to the main camp. Many of these survivors lived in squalid conditions, facing starvation, disease, and brutality.

The Exhaustion of the System: The sheer scale of killings at Auschwitz created an atmosphere of chaos and exhaustion. The Nazis attempted to maintain a rapid pace of exterminations, but the mass slaughter left the system overwhelmed. The survivors, whether they escaped death by gassing or were spared temporarily for labor or experimentation, managed to survive a few days or months before their eventual fate—often death by starvation, disease, or further selection for the gas chambers.

In summary, many people at Auschwitz did survive the gassing process, but it was due to either mistakes by the Nazis, delays in the killing process, or some kind of temporary reprieve (such as being used for medical experiments or forced labor). The number of survivors was very small compared to the total number of victims, and those who did survive often faced extreme suffering before their eventual liberation or death.

You said:

oh so they were "working" instead.. like what were they doing?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, some prisoners at Auschwitz survived because they were deemed useful for forced labor. The Nazis used these individuals for a wide variety of tasks, often under inhumane conditions, to support the war effort, the camp’s operations, and the economic needs of the Third Reich. The work they were forced to do was grueling and exhausting, and the prisoners were treated as disposable.

Here are some of the main types of forced labor that prisoners in Auschwitz and other concentration camps were subjected to:

1. Labor in the Camp Itself

[maxed out under halfway.. continued in comments]

You can go to jail, just for researching this, eh. So it's been kind of rough to sit there watching this doc. But when it got into this part, you pay attention and don't feel like doing other things. You can actually watch it.

It's too long to upload a clip here. But I got the transcript. Used the closed captioning but that has time-stamps all over. I use chat gpt to remove it but later it realizes what's going on and says it can't continue. It's cause it's a conflict of interest, where the facts are going against "history". Then when you get it to analyze what's being said here, where, they go research stuff and things actually point towards the opposite. Then it shuts it down and doesn't like going there.

Looking at pictures of inside there, the chimneys, seems like a "renovation" where it's added later and wouldn't be rough like that, the way things are when they're built. Then, just this "gas".. nothing's air-tight. Seems like this stuff is flammable too and would explode, but supposedly they got this incinerator right by there. On and on.

How much characters is this transcript.. 12k.. should fit in here.

Part 21 Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story NEVER Told!

In 1992, a brilliant young Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary about the Holocaust.

This is an edited version of his work.

The complete documentary "Cole in Auschwitz" can be viewed on the internet.

I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the Holocaust are few.

Literally, all there is are the "eyewitness" testimonies and postwar confessions.

There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews.

And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz.

The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as "proofs."

Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation.

For example, these exhibits are said to be the material "proofs" of exterminations.

There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove?

It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem.

That's not denied, so why wouldn't there be piles of human hair?

What about the piles of shoes and clothing; is that a proof?

It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes.

So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing?

It doesn't prove anybody was killed.

What about the canisters of gas?

No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings.

Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time.

It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them.

The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures.

So what other proofs are offered?

Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the ground-breaking thesis that people got sick in the camp.

Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths.

Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children.

But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber.

And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept.

For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken at Auschwitz by the Allies during the war.

They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned, even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost non-stop.

Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building:

Obvious marks on the walls and floors, where apparently walls had been knocked down.

Equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been.

We maintain that, unlike the large hollow chamber we now see, this room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom.

Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage:

Four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand.

It is said that through these four holes, Zyklon B crystals were dropped.

And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them.

Do these holes prove homicidal gassings?

Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber.

Let's start again talking about this building here.

This is a crematorium/gas chamber.

But this is a reconstruction?

It is in original state.

Original? Original state. It is an original part. Original.

Oh, it is original?

Original, in through this chimney was thrown Zyklon B.

Later, a senior official would confirm that the holes in the roof had been built after the war.

Are those the original holes in the ceiling?

No. They've been rebuilt? Yes. After the war?

After the war, yes. Dr. Franciszek Piper, the senior curator and director of archives at the Auschwitz State Museum, admitted on camera to David Cole that "Krema 1," the alleged "homicidal gas chamber" at the Auschwitz main camp, was in fact fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union under direct orders of Stalin.

This includes the fake chimney, that is not even connected with the crematorium.

This is Auschwitz-Birkenau in an Allied aerial photo from September 1944.

The train that would come up, carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp.

This was a spectacle that nobody in the camp could miss; they would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out.

These were "gas chambers" that were not isolated from anyone, and indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late 70s, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau.

Another question that should be asked:

Is there any Zyklon B residue in the gas chamber, knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue?

Conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question.

He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B.

Now, the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale.

In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Leuchter's findings, and their own tests got back the same results.

In Canada in 1988, Ernst Zündel faced charges for Holocaust denial in a second trial.

He hired American Frederick A. Leuchter, a court-certified expert in gas execution technology.

After secretly conducting scientific experiments in camps such as Auschwitz in Poland, on his return he published his findings in the "Leuchter Report."

[after this chatgpt stopped transcribing the closed captioned text, removing time-stamps and I had to remove them manually]

I told Mr. Zundel and his defense team prior to my going, that if I did in fact find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did, did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. I would make that very clear in my report. And that is what I would testify to, when I testified in court.

What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities?

You must have gasketed doors, no windows. Means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out. If those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executies died, they certainly would have been blown to bits, when the gas exploded from a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting in to the crematory furnace.

We're talking about brick and mortar buildings, without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors. In some cases without doors at all.

And with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. I mean it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.

There's no such a thing as an "eye witness". I have never seen a report that was written, by anyone, who had a valid description of what could of happened at a gassing.

So, the long and the short of it is, there are no eye witnesses, because there were no gassings.

I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective.

You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives, as well as everybody else, to speak ill of the departed communist state.

But it was not always that way. During World War 2, the Soviets were more than just a military ally; their anti-Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other Allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is, that, as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact.

With the 20-20 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland; Majdanek. Belzec, Chelmno, Treblinka and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information.

THE RISE AND FALL OF THE AUSCHWITZ DEATH TOLL

In Krakov, the trial of the principal culprits for the Auschwitz concentration camp came to an end before a Polish court. 1945- 300.000 dead.

Altogether nearly 300.000 people from the most different nations died in the Auschwitz concentration camp.

FOUR MILLION PEOPLE SUFERED AND DIED HERE AT THE HANDS OF THE NAZI MURDERERS BETWEEN THE YEARS 1940 AND 1945

1948- 4 Million

1989- 1.5 Million

ABOUT ONE AND A HALF MILLION MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN, MAINLY JEWS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES OF EUROPE.

AUSCHWITZ - BIRKENAU 1940-1945

Deaths at Auschwitz drop by a huge 2.5 million, but still the total 6.000.000 deaths remains the same.

THE MEDIA HISTORY OF THE "SIX MILLION" 1915- 2013

... Six million Jews... Six Million Souls... 6.000,000 ... the 6.000.000 Jews... ... 6.000.000 IN... SIX MILLION JEWS ... "the European holocaust." ... A depressing picture of 6.000.000...

[those were newspaper clippings from years before the war, where they were using that number!]

PIERS MORGAN TONIGHT 2013

CNN - 2013

I believe in the inarguable fact, that 6 million Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a President of Iran, and as a scholar, do you believe 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true?

In a 2005 speech, Iran's former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, caused an international uproar by describing the Holocaust as a fabricated legend promoted to protect Israel.

David Cole disappires after his 1994 appearance on the Phil Donahue show after receiving several death threats from Jewish extremists.

He recently emerged from hiding in 2013.

In Canada in 1988, Ernst Zündel was convicted and sentenced to a nine-month jail term after the court dismissed Leucher's testimony.

Later, Ernst Zündel will spent 2 years in solitary confinement in a Canadian jail before being deported to Germany to stand trial.

Fred Leuchter asked for a joint scientific investigation into the Holocust. It never happened. Insteed he was targeted by Jewish extremists and his career ruined.

Since its publication the Leuchter Report has earned legendary status in the world of Hoocaust Revisionism.

Denying the Holocaust is a criminal offence and carries a custodial sentence in several European counries.

The Holocaust is the ONLY event in history to be enforced by law.

Notable Political Prisoners:

1998. Jürgen Graf, Swiss Court 15 months imprisonment

1999. Gerhard Förster, Swiss Court 12 months imprisonment

2000. Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, Swiss Court 1 year imprisonment.

2001. David Irving, Austrian court. 1 year imprisonment.

2002. Germar Rudolf, German court. 21/2 years imprisonment.

2003. Ernst Zündel, German court. 5 years imprisonment.

2004. Wolfgang Fröhlich, Austrian court. 6 years imprisonment.

2005. Sylvia Stolz, German court. 3 1/2 years imprisonment.

2006. Horst Mahler, German court. 5 years imprisonment.

2007. Dirk Zimmerman, German court. 9 months imprisonment.

But I don't think 6 million Jews were gassed. Now be... be careful, I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German, or somebody with the German state, you could have me thrown in prison, before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

2009. Bishop Richard Williamson, German court, 12,000 fine

To be continued

Might still have text room here.. Then I'm looking up that documentary "Cole in Auschwitz" David Cole, they use in here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cole_(journalist)

I'm there.. this guy sounds like he's Jewish.. yet he's researching this.. over there. Yeah.. so he's actually a Jew but he's looking into this stuff. Which, you'd think.. you'd go to prison for doing that, right. So this is a good one.

Then what's the deal with his name. "David Christopher Cole, also known as David Stein (born c. 1968), is an American film director. In the 1990s, he gained publicity as a Holocaust denier.[2] Much of the controversy Cole attracted resulted from the fact that he is Jewish. After changing his name to David Stein following death threats, "

"Life until 1998 Cole was raised in West Los Angeles as a secular Jew. "

So this guy's a Jew here. I haven't watch this yet.. it's an hour long. Where he's researching this and they used some of the footage in that 6hr doc. Plus it's on youtube.

David Cole In Auschwitz 1992 Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO659PP_unQ

Then you get the first comment.. "The truth doesn't need laws to protect it. In 18 countries you can go to jail for 5 years for even asking questions."

It's like WTF.. you can't even research or you go to jail, right.

But it kind of makes sense how the Russians would do that. They were trying to invade Russia. So they had a beef with these guys. But why would Germany have these super strict laws, if it's bogus.

I'm still in the middle of gradually checking out this Hampstead case. Have a few bookmarks on my bookmarks bar to gradually check, while eating meals. So busy with work, sleep.. barely get the chores done, on weekends. No spare time, ok.

But this case.. I'm up to 53min of that interview from the cops of this girl. You know she's telling the truth. I looked into this case a bit.. It's so bad, eh.. where higher levels of society were involved.. and the whole damn school staff.. the cops.

It's like what Svali, the illuminati programmer talked about. How it's not just upper levels.. it's lower levels too in society, that they gradually infiltrated over generations.

Seems like the case.. the judge said it was the mom making the kids lie. No.. ok.. So this kid had a younger brother too.. before that only saw about her vid.. so there's more where he's doing testimony to the cops.

I'm just starting to gradually look into this case and going to watch, her whole vid.. that was like what.. 2 and a half hours. So.. up to 53 min.

Let me get those bookmarks on the bookmarks bar. Other stuff I found out about the case, to check out.

HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT (@narrativesaint) | TikTok

https://www.tiktok.com/@narrativesaint

So.. it was some older stuff.. where I was looking into this dad. Trying to find out the real 2 kids names and how they're doing these days. So this was 2014.. she was 9. She's not around social networking. You did see this vid screeshot of the dad who was involved in acting and had an imdb page.. They're in the UK.. but he was going to Hollywood. I can see how it's easy for him to get involved with these guys cause they do the same nasty things. Was a screenshot of a vid of him doing a video with the two kids behind him.. like I don't know.. a few years later.. so you see her more grown up. Maybe 2016. Getting some ebay award. Let me check the browser history for what that search was.

"ricky dearman" ebay for business awards uk video may 2018

So that's the dad.. Was an amazon book about the case where it said the two kids real names.. let me get that.

"Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, & the Deep State: Chapter 31: The Hampstead 2 Whistleblowing Kids Expose Satanic Cult’s MK Ritual Abuse-Child Porn Operation Kindle Edition by Joachim Hagopian (Author)"

https://www.amazon.ca/Pedophilia-Empire-Hampstead-Whistleblowing-Abuse-Child-ebook/dp/B0838M921N

Meet 8-year old Gabriel Gareeva Dearman and 9-year old Alisa Gareeva Dearman - the dynamic Hampstead duo that by February 2015 had announced to the world one of the largest satanic pedo operations in British history.

So now you got the real kids names.. Well how I started researching.. first looked up Hampstead and this kathy fox blog. That's where I was looking up the higher level, mother of darkness in training, during the 80's.. Jessie Czebotar.. she was doing radio interviews.. so you understand the occult aspect of all this.. how they're born into it.

I look up kathy fox blog.. they had a later wordpress page where they'd talk about satanic ritual abuse cases.. and then added the word hampstead. Let me get that search..

"cathy fox blog" Hampstead

https://foxyfox.substack.com/p/hampstead-ritual-abuse

Further down they get into characters.. seems like some people are going down from this, eh.

ok let's keep going with these other bookmarks on the bookmarks bar, about the case.

So this is the mom..

Ella Draper, Mother of Hampstead "Papa Kills Babies" Children and Abraham Christie's Two Hour Interview with Paul Marco of World Beyond Belief (June 15, 2015)

https://educate-yourself.org/cn/EllaDraperAbrahamChristieinterview14jun15.shtml

That one.. I recognize the guy who's in the screenshot.. from earlier conspiracy research the other year.

[This interview with Alfred Webre fills in many areas of the story which were not known from earlier printed dewcriptions. Both Ellan & Abraham reveal important understandings and perceptions as the saga developed in the Fall of 2014.]

March 31, 2015 (with Alfred Lambremont Webre)

What's this one.. facebook notes..

GABRIEL DEARMAN POLICE INTERVIEW #1

Video transcript by Kane Slater

https://www.facebook.com/notes/1667104556798165/

Made this list from an instagram short, several weeks ago where they just talked about the scare score, and named the films. I look up each one, get an imdb link for each. I don't do trailers though because it spoils too much. Gradually going through these in recent weeks. Only spare time is during meals and resume next one.

Lately I checked out the Insidious series. Like, you'll get one in this list and then you check out the others. So, the smile series, too.

Let me get that text file of the list.

"Scare score" = Heart Rate (BPM) + Stress (HRV) heart rate variant.

10. Talk to Me (2022) Scare score: 75/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10638522/

11. Hell House LLC (2015) Scare score: 75/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4267026/

12. The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) Scare score: 76/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0404032/

13. Smile (2022) Scare score: 78/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15474916/

14. Hereditary (2018) Scare score: 81/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7784604/

15. The Conjuring (2013) Scare score: 88/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1457767/

16. Insidious (2010) Scare score: 90/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1591095/

17. Skinamarink (2022) Scare score: 91/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt21307994/

18. Host (2020) Scare score: 95/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12749596/

19. Sinister (2012) Scare score: 96/100 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1922777/

Up to Host (2020) and they had some lines about the "why", they use candles.

"Go ahead and light your candles. Yep. The candle is going to be our guiding focus. and it's going to encourage the spirit. It will give them almost a beacon to come towards."

This is like the "Talk to Me (2022)", where it's really basic, with the artifact but they also use a candle.

Betcha if I'd check the Insidious stuff, they'd be using candles during. That series, they go on the other side. Almost like dreamland, but probably more like when somebody dies in the hospital and comes back. The near death expericence stuff. Lots of research into that in the 1970's. They'll tell you things they saw in other rooms, you can verify. Like how are they doing that, if it's bogus.

But yeah.. just the "candle".. I wonder if that goes through, somehow, to this other realm. Why would it be doing that.. "fire".

You almost don't wanna be using candles in your place, cause it might bring up who knows what.

Also.. "churches" and the candles, eh.

I don't use candles though.. cause of the fire hazard. Falling asleep.