1
meteorknife 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because there's already a dot win dedicated to it. Everyone can choose to discuss it if they want. I wouldn't remove posts about it.

2
meteorknife 2 points ago +2 / -0

Once again, I wouldn't ban anything. Q stuff is a little different since there's already a dot win for it. I imagine the community here will either reject it or keep it with voting.

And by Q stuff, I don't mean deepstate shenanigans and all of whats currently going on. That can live in both places. I just mean that we wouldn't sticky Q drops or encourage Q memes.

2
meteorknife 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not saying that it doesnt, just that that's where I would draw the line if people didn't want it here.

Clearly I'm not anti Q. I'm not really even pro Q. Its just another topic about skepticism in our everyday lives like all the other conspiracies.

1
meteorknife 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q stuff belongs in greatawakening, non Q stuff belongs here.

I have no intention of intervening unless people are breaking community rules.

4
meteorknife 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, dot win supports wikis. I dont think any of them are currently in use.

This is the communities.win wiki example: https://communities.win/wiki/example-wiki-page/

2
meteorknife 2 points ago +7 / -5

I would like to volunteer as a conspiracies mod. I already have mod experience at greatawakening dot win and feel like I can contribute that knowledge and experience. We are currently trying to separate Q stuff from conspiracy posts anyways.

I do have CSS experience and can definitely clean this place up. For any customizations, I would need help from a graphic designer (logos, customized upvotes, rotating sidebar images). I have basic experience and know people I can reach out to, but I'd rather have a volunteer from here.

Overall my goal would be to provide a place for skepticism and the spreading of information. I have no desire to censor, but will abide by whatever rules the community decides on (through reporting). Honestly, I love discussing the fringiest of fringe conspiracies and will commit to monitoring those discussions as the community suggests.