-1
JosephGoebbel5 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Most likely your arrogance which is common amongst elder siblings. You couldn't control the estate and they fucked you off.

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a good family relationship with my mom

Yet you didn't go home for Christmas... 🤔

2
JosephGoebbel5 2 points ago +3 / -1

You came from a family yourself though. Do you still talk to your mom & siblings? Or did that end upon your dad dying?

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

You did when you accidentally admitted you came from natalism. Now, do you still talk to them or not?

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

Does your mom remind you of Hitler or something? That's your immediate go-to when backed into a corner. Do you love your mom, yes or no?

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +2 / -1

He stated facts. You dismissed it as emotionally based opinions.

Prejudiced. You must be HR.

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +2 / -1

Therein lies my point; he didn't feel he was mistreated, he was demonstrably mistreated. You were sympathizing with SwampAss instead of aiming for a resolve. You ignore Swampy's wrongdoing and you prejudged ExpressionOfTheSoul because you are prejudiced. And you CONTINUE to dismiss him as speaking with emotions. Your apology is meaningless when you wilfully continue the behavior you're purporting to be apologizing for.

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm sorry I didn't directly speak to your feelings of being mistreated

I love this pilpul tactic; "I'm sorry that you're wrong because emotions".

This isn't a matter of feelings, it's a matter of fact. Your bias has been demonstrated countless times, and each time you dismiss it as emotions while trying to appear "neutral", but you double down on your bias each time you do it.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The only agreement you will come to is when people bend the knee to your will. You are incapable of compromise.

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, even now you can't agree that sexualizing kids is wrong...

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

You already shilled it? Say it ain't so! 😂

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not defending child molesters.

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's no proof in your proof, goy!

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +2 / -1

Her cope will reach monumental levels if you confront her on simping for Pedo Paleo. She sides with him 100% of the time, without fail.

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never done the thing your link proves I did

1
JosephGoebbel5 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just wait till she starts shilling mediation in a dead sub that she herself happens to own in lieu of c/Meta

0
JosephGoebbel5 0 points ago +1 / -1

It all comes to account, my goal is to have good marks in His regard, if I'm wrong, nothing matters anyway. I'm right though, He has proven it to me, you are welcome to ask the same of Him and get your proof.

And that includes defending child molesters?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›