Probably bullshit. I've never seen a thermobaric bomb or damage, but
1.) a thermobaric bomb's purpose is to burn people and to burn oxygen for suffocating people. Harming people was clearly a no-no here.
2.) a thermobaric bomb must explode quickly for dispersing the fuel over a large space, but does not do as much damage as conventional explosives. Usually dropped from airplanes during raids. Why all the effort for something inappropriate?
3.) at least one explosion came from inside the AT&T building, as evidenced by videos and square manhole damage. A thermobaric bomb is for scorching dug-in people outdoors.
The relatively little damage (in the relatively confined space of the street) with all the soot is more or less like that in the oaklahoma city bombing and the oslo bombing, both of which were fertilizer bombs, only much bigger. Armyfags or naysayer who know better are welcome here. I'm a larp and want to know better, too.
What's Richard Jewell's real name? I have to look up what you mean.
I was live in the first threads on 4c when it happened. You are right in that Nashville was glowing like a welding arc and has become stranger ever since. There was an even stranger happening with a scavenger hunt with tor-links in videos and chinese documents with Anthony Quinn Warner's name on a list. I was sceptical, because the center of the chase that started it was "Rittenhouse Square" in philly, which has a KEK-monument at its center. I could not post that, perhaps you have seen my request (link to thread in post):
Here is a handy list in another post, now updated. Keep me posted, I'll do my best to extend the list.
Putin did nothing wrong. He is a spergo who was larping as a humint recruiter in East Germany. Guess how well that worked. How did he climb the ranks in the KGB? Beats me. Perhaps he contributed as a trainspotter, otaku, anorak, however you want to call it, and wrote pedantic reports. Source: internet, I'm lazy.
There is a fairly productive thread on 4chan now:
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/300113012
Many points already here, but also some novel ones.
1.) Lin Wood wants to provoke disclosure in a court of libel
2.) Lin Wood is very good at disclosure, so he thinks he can pull that off with his crack PIs
3.) This assumes honest, uncompromised courts, so it might be a non-starter
4.) Or Wood will be sethriched soon
All bets still off. In another thread, an anon opens with the sharp conclusion that possessing evidence, encrypted or not, without turning it over to police, is a felony, so this begs the question "what is he thinking" again.
Curiouser and couriouser.
This is interesting, and I like the name "the mad truther", but is it related to 90s online life? Just asking because I missed it.
At any rate, this is a huge problem. I will show that to antisemitic friends who are computer-illiterate to various degrees.
k, did not know
Good point.