Probably bullshit. I've never seen a thermobaric bomb or damage, but
1.) a thermobaric bomb's purpose is to burn people and to burn oxygen for suffocating people. Harming people was clearly a no-no here.
2.) a thermobaric bomb must explode quickly for dispersing the fuel over a large space, but does not do as much damage as conventional explosives. Usually dropped from airplanes during raids. Why all the effort for something inappropriate?
3.) at least one explosion came from inside the AT&T building, as evidenced by videos and square manhole damage. A thermobaric bomb is for scorching dug-in people outdoors.
The relatively little damage (in the relatively confined space of the street) with all the soot is more or less like that in the oaklahoma city bombing and the oslo bombing, both of which were fertilizer bombs, only much bigger. Armyfags or naysayer who know better are welcome here. I'm a larp and want to know better, too.
FBI is inventing a way for there to be a bomb when there is no evidence of a bomb. FBI: "Bomber left the stove on and then lit a match at the right moment"... Bull shit.
THX. That's the point the FBI wants to drive home here, but it is strange that they are somewhat sabotaging the official narrative. As another poster pointed out, they might want to smear the military. I'm not surprised, because Nashville was not done by a disgruntled boomer. The question is whether the perps wanted to blow up the data center or cut communication. A connection to election fraud is not far-fetched. What's more, there were those anon-pics before and after shit was going down, what would support that the datacenter was targeted.
Probably bullshit. I've never seen a thermobaric bomb or damage, but
1.) a thermobaric bomb's purpose is to burn people and to burn oxygen for suffocating people. Harming people was clearly a no-no here.
2.) a thermobaric bomb must explode quickly for dispersing the fuel over a large space, but does not do as much damage as conventional explosives. Usually dropped from airplanes during raids. Why all the effort for something inappropriate?
3.) at least one explosion came from inside the AT&T building, as evidenced by videos and square manhole damage. A thermobaric bomb is for scorching dug-in people outdoors.
The relatively little damage (in the relatively confined space of the street) with all the soot is more or less like that in the oaklahoma city bombing and the oslo bombing, both of which were fertilizer bombs, only much bigger. Armyfags or naysayer who know better are welcome here. I'm a larp and want to know better, too.
k, did not know
Good point.
Bunker buster bombs are not thermobaric. Typically they are filled with high explosive.
Also, if this was a fuel air bomb it points to a state actor. Regular people don't have the money to do the testing required for such devices.
THX. That's the point the FBI wants to drive home here, but it is strange that they are somewhat sabotaging the official narrative. As another poster pointed out, they might want to smear the military. I'm not surprised, because Nashville was not done by a disgruntled boomer. The question is whether the perps wanted to blow up the data center or cut communication. A connection to election fraud is not far-fetched. What's more, there were those anon-pics before and after shit was going down, what would support that the datacenter was targeted.