▲ 6 ▼
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’m 80% sure that by definition, any plane the “Vice President” is on becomes temporarily designated as air force 2 (or 1 in the case of the President).

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow your massive pile of contributions to the site speak for themself, I can only one day hope to contribute to the conversation as much as “waaaaaaaaaah DAE hate the rona and wearing masks” truly and new and exciting insight you’ve provided us there lmfao.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I posted this as a bit of a Rorschach test for everyone, not really hoping for any response in particular, but I appreciate you deciding to kick things off.

In the case of p53 it “kills” for the greater good of the community. Does modern society have any cancerous elements? Have any cheaters or clusters of cheaters stolen so much from the surplus they’ve become able to warp the very rules of the game? Would their excision be an act of Light, or Dark?

It’s just a short story providing background in a video game, but I thought I’d share in case discerning minds could gather value from it.

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s because the Falun Gong know truths that would collapse the communist world(and capitalist for that matter but wrong country to worry about that)

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4udaw1w/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/

They know about and share their knowledge of human bio energy and the true power of the individual. These are antithetical to control structures.

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think I’m starting to grok some of this. Thank you so much I hope you continue to inspire

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok a lot to discuss and think on, thank you:

...How can it be true if it's constantly changing?...

The Tao that can be named is not the true Tao.

I feel like a lot of your communications are seemingly contradictory, but also that pointing out the “contradictions that aren’t” of reality is part of your point. To reduce it, you proclaim the truth of the absence of truth, what am I missing there?

... comprehension of the consequences of actions allows one to understand origin and outcome, and together one can comprehend the means of operation.

How does one attain this skill of comprehension? You seem dismissive of quantum mechanics and einsteinian mechanics, yet fond of Newtonian mechanics or atleast his “laws”. I notice you have picked up on the degenerative, subversive element of civilization, why does this subversion not extend back to Newton and his alchemical, to put it broadly, beliefs and doctrines?

And lastly to your points on desire and wants as corruptions of sustaining truth, how does one live and love without a vague sense of wants and desires? These provide us our goalposts in physical existence, do they not? When you were younger you desired to learn more and not be content with what was provided, so much so you devised a theory of existence to fill the gap you desired filled, right?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Simulation" is more like a figure of speech here, no simulators required.

Yes, exactly.

“ And yet this game is nothing compared to the game played by the gardener and the winnower. It resembles that game as a seed does a flower—no, as a seed resembles the star that fed the flower and all the life that made it.”

There is apparently a limit to what can be known or proven in math, and by extension, about the world.

IMO that is a truly exciting idea. Finally science and math, through their own effort, have cast off the materialist reductionist world view that has weakened our connection with reality.

The next domino to fall hopefully? The observer “problem”. I am that can only dream. If you’re open to a cool video to spark some more discussion, check my submissions for “magic is and always has been real”.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some great historical and technical context here on Conway’s game, thanks!

What are your thoughts on Gödel’s incompleteness theorem with regards to this topic? Is the entire idea of modeling a flawed basis to start at? Do you believe reality could be a simulation or have you any reason to rule that out?

▲ 11 ▼
Graphenium 11 points ago +11 / -0

ATS and GLP were compromised a long time ago, but certainly I’ve seen some good research from there before. It would be cool if any vets of those forums had “best of” posts to back up here, but I never browsed enough to collect that kind of thing.

It’s still weird for a conspiracy forum to not allow mention of other conspiracy forums IMO

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

a system based on motion

You assert this, and I admit it feels logically consistent and, on some level atleast, true. However I’m not convinced it is an omnipresent truth, it could totally just be a truth fundamental to our level of perception. Like I’ve raised before, the cutting edge of science seems to fly in the face of your claims. What do you make of the research that indicates our “minds are made up” long before we ever consciously settle on a potential action in response to a choice?

the rules that define how motion operates

My deepest desire is to understand the answer to these questions. But any explanation that leaves questions can’t be the explanation, right?

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the only thing that cannot change within motion?

Well according to quantum mechanical interpretations of reality an object’s motion (momentum) and its location are simultaneously (un)knowable, so I’m not sure what the answer here is, even if I give you the rest of your axioms and elaborations

Edit: no offense or attempt to reduce meant, but it almost feels to me like you just took the word “energy” in physics and replace it with “motion” but I’m just not sure what all that means or encompasses, thanks for taking the time to discuss in many of my threads I really appreciate it!

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now what do you think is the reason for each one potential having a choice within the loss of potentiality?

To prune that which produces interference with the all from that which produces resonance? Maybe?...I don’t know?... how are you so confident in this? Because it resonates with your ONE?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way I conceive of things, the information were provided with, if tapped into everything available these days is like trying to drink out of a firehose, lethal for the brain. Maybe those of us who lived through /b/ in the early aughts are uniquely able to have a flood of absolute shit and still be able to pick out the gold, but I think it comes down to two things in this case, having a well tuned bullshit detector (read as much as you can about science and history and philosophy and humanity and why we are the way we are) and pruning the sources of information you expose yourself to. For example the only subs I browsed on reddit were r/con or subs similar in theme. But reddit is just too far gone these days so this place is filling that void. You don’t ever want to cut yourself off from “the mainstream” though, if you see what they’re fixating on you have a good idea on things to look into (the whys and whos of whatever story they’re shilling on)

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but if we go by the current scientific paradigm, your “reality” is a shoddily constructed simulation, raw unprocessed quantum reality being warped and shredded and rearranged and ignored by your wet hardware and then fed to your sensory organs to be “experienced” as “reality”. Surely you aren’t saying that we know reality are you?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

You might like the topic I just posted.

IMO it boils down to rationality for what that can successfully be applied to and for everything else, being able to feel what resonates with the true you

Black pills are almost always poison, the world isn’t monochromatic.

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just to add a thought I had after:

Prepper shit, and things to make your life easier in the event of any supply chain problems in the future. So don’t buy the water purifier gadget that requires a proprietary filter every 20gal, get a high quality roof and gutter catchment system or a distillation system if that’s feasible. Invest in a wood furnace with passive air over a machine you’ll never be able to fix, that kinda thing. Also probably solar panels lol

▲ 12 ▼
Graphenium 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think the only real answer is tangible assets. Land, source of water, source of food, the tools to acquire/prepare food and water. If you keep your money in stocks it will vanish as the collapse happens, if you keep it in savings it will vanish after the collapse as interest rates go negative.

▲ 8 ▼
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Mineut and his alt are fighting their holy crusade, unfortunately never once sharing a submission or what they actually think is going on. But hey more power to him atleast he hasn’t had a breakdown yet and resorted to spas-posting like BelsonMandellaTheThird.

Oh and TwoBearArms certainly has a lot of time on his hands to describe how a rational person would conclude Tiffany Dover is alive and well and totally living her normal life.

Oh and honorable mention to our resident doctor who just so happened to be working at Tiffany’s hospital, we are so lucky to have this guy around, I mean WHAT are the odds :

https://conspiracies.win/u/TNd0c/

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

What scares me are the useful idiots saying anything along the lines of “See! Look how quick they got it under control! We in the West could learn a thing or two!” Without stopping to think and realize that the “thing or two” might only work in a totalitarian hellscape

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once upon a time,*

a gardener and a winnower lived**

together in a garden.***

/* It was once before a time, because time had not yet begun.

/** We did not live. We existed as principles of ontological dynamics that emerged from mathematical structures, as bodiless and inevitable as the primes.

/*** It was the field of possibility that prefigured existence.

They existed, because they had to exist. They had no antecedent and no constituents, and there is no instrument of causality by which they could be portioned into components and assigned to some schematic of their origin. If you followed the umbilical of history in search of some ultimate atavistic embryo that became them, you would end your journey marooned here in this garden.

In the morning, the gardener pushed seeds down into the wet loam of the garden to see what they would become.

In the evening, the winnower reaped the day's crop and separated what would flourish from what had failed.

The day was longer than all of time, and the night was swifter than a glint of light on a falling sugar crystal. Insects buzzed between the flowers, and worms slithered between the roots, feeding on what was and what might be, the first gradient in existence, the first dynamo of life. Rain fell from no sky. Voices spoke without mouth or meaning. A tree of silver wings bloomed yielded fruit shed feathers bloomed again.

In the day between the morning and the evening, the gardener and the winnower played a game of possibilities.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Really good documentary to go with this research: The Revelation of the Pyramids. Ties together almost every megalithic/archeoastronomic site on earth onto an old equator! (Thank god for the list of recommended docs, so much good info to port over from the 11(?) years of r/con)

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4zJ7mRK/call-it-atlantis-lemuria-agartha/c/

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›