1
flame_whip 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree, the first 30 seconds wasn't the best, but you should at least watch the first 2 parts. There's way more than enough raw data in there to keep you busy for a while and that data way more than makes up for the blunder of starting off with the tattoo guy.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +2 / -0

EXACTLY. The holocaust narrative uses such an expensive execution method:

  1. Pack them on trains (why not simply execute on-site like the Soviets often did?)
  2. Line them up into extremely crammed spaces (which is unable to withstand massive revolt)
  3. Gas them (not exactly cheap compared to simply using bullets, which were already being manufactured en masse due to the war effort)

If Germany wanted to commit a genocide, why not just shoot and starve people like the USSR was doing? That worked amazingly well... they were able to kill some 30 million to 60 million people, almost an order of magnitude more than what was allegedly killed in the holocaust. You'd think Germany would simply follow their Big Red Neighbor's example... but noooo... German efficiency demands that we kill them and dispose of the bodies using an elaborate, expensive, and infeasible Rube Goldberg Machine--while we're in the middle of a massive multi-front war with pretty much the entire planet. Riiiiiight...

The censorship aspect is also a telltale sign, as you say. Why arrest people for questioning the truth if the truth is self-evident? People aren't arrested for saying the sky is green, even though it's clearly blue--why arrest them for saying Germany didn't commit the holocaust, if they clearly did?

I mean it does make sense, Nazi soldiers show up in the overpopulated poor neighborhoods, tell people to enter the trains because they will be taken to camps "for their own safety", people trust their government and board the train, gets a hot shower while their clothes is being deloused and are then living in the camps, forced to work. Just like in Gulag or any other forced labor camp at the time, only with better living conditions.

Precisely. And as you say, German camps were FAR better than Gulags. There were still ugly things that happened there, but much, much less than what is claimed. And sometimes they were downright pleasant, for a labor camp. The Gulags were where the real holocaust occurred. It was the Soviet Union who killed the Jews and blamed it on the Germans. See my comments below for more info.

What's scary about all this is the similarities to the FEMA camps, and the fact that nobody mentions the Typhus pandemic going on at the time back then, affecting mostly poor people. Seems to be only a question of time before poor Americans are sent to FEMA camps "for their own safety", forcefully vaccinated against covid with experimental medicine, then basically living there and working, just like in the concentration camps.

Right. I'm also quite concerned about AOC's / Kamala Harris's "re-education" camps which sound all too similar to the Gulags. Sounds like a mass-genocide of conservatives / Christians / white people is on the way... check out this essay by Eustace Mullins which I linked to below: There's a Gulag In Your Future

0
flame_whip 0 points ago +2 / -2

There's no point in arguing with you or trying to convince you of anything. My inbox is flooded from responses by both of you shills. I don't even remember what your "question" was, you're both too busy calling me a Jew and making retarded insults.

I'd be happy to give you plenty of material to dig into, but you're just interested in being a jackass at this point.

0
flame_whip 0 points ago +2 / -2

Have a nice life with your head up your ass.

Gnostics are shills by default. You and your butt buddy on the thread are clearly both Gnostics, as you spout your silly nonsense about Yaldabaoth and such.

1
flame_whip 1 point ago +3 / -2

Have a nice life with your head up your ass.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +3 / -1

Is that your defense mechanism?

You can't argue, so just call the opposition a Jew.

If anyone bothered to look up any of the books or authors I'm recommending, they'd clearly see I'm no Jew.

But hey, you're just a Gnostic shill anyway, so I'm not surprised at your behavior.

0
flame_whip 0 points ago +2 / -2

LOL!!!! What??

I hate the Talmud. It is garbage blasphemy that calls the Lord Jesus Christ a bastard and a sorcerer. I hate that awful trash.

Go read The Plot Against Christianity by Elizabeth Dilling. You'll see my thoughts on the Talmud contained therein.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +4 / -2

Nope! LOL. Just me!

I guess the votes are coming from other people with a brain.

You definitely can't box me into a "disgruntled Protestant." I will admit that I'm a Christian. You guys are just clearly Gnostic shills, spinning your usual fairy tales and propaganda.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +5 / -3

Shove your Gnostic braindead claptrap back into your Demiurge's ass.

You people are just propagandists who have been at it for centuries.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +3 / -1

LOL! Nope. Not Jewish.

Eustace Mullins Jewish? Wow. You are beyond ignorant. He was descended from the pilgrims on the Mayflower.

1
flame_whip 1 point ago +2 / -1

Because it has far more real and reliable data than whatever pseudepigrapha you're pulling your crap from.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +3 / -1

ROFL.

Yeah. The sanitized Second Edition is online.

Get a real one.

3
flame_whip 3 points ago +5 / -2

All cannibalistic rituals descended from Cain and Nimrod.

There is no such thing as "Christian" Gnostics. Gnosticism is inherently antithetical to the gospel of Christ. This is common sense.

Try reading The Plot Against Christianity by Elizabeth Dilling. Never mind, that would be way above your IQ level.

1
flame_whip 1 point ago +3 / -2

LOL. Sadly, Nimrod was much less fictional than the junk you're spinning. Go buy yourself an Encyclopedia Judaica and do some real homework.

3
flame_whip 3 points ago +4 / -1

Eustace Mullins read thousands upon thousands of books in the Library of Congress and had a photographic memory. He was the first person to expose the influence of the Federal Reserve in both world wars and every major catastrophe since. He was silenced and hunted by the government throughout his life.

Can you say the same?

For some reason, I doubt you ever got your hands on an actual book printed before WWII.

4
flame_whip 4 points ago +6 / -2

The Gnostics simply have their origins as the ones who "knew" where the pieces of Nimrod's body were hidden after he was executed by the Biblical Patriarch, Shem.

Read The Curse of Canaan, by Eustace Mullins.

The correct way to say it is the the Gnostics are a Canaanite cult descended from the time of Nimrod. Jews are just the modern day mask of the ancient Canaanites / Babylonians. There is no problem with true Jews, but the Babylonians (synagogue of Satan) are what people are complaining about and what is destroying our society.

4
flame_whip 4 points ago +4 / -0

BINGO.

You hit the nail on the head. That is exactly right.

The only other Jews which died aside from the Soviets' victims were the ones who died in German camps, due to the bombing of German supply lines from the Allied carpet bombers. But that number was negligible compared to what was killed by the Soviets. And that wasn't the Germans' fault anyway; they were trying to feed and treat the sick and starving Jews, but couldn't, because we were destroying their supply lines.

As for why the Germans had the Jews interned in the first place: the Germans were trying to prep the Jews to leave from Germany to Israel, as documented here and elsewhere: https://archive.org/details/TheHolocaustHoaxExposed

(edited for formatting, and to explain my last point)

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Photo manipulation, simply propaganda. Sergei Eisenstein (a famous Soviet movie filmmaker) was in charge of manufacturing and manipulating evidence for the Nuremberg Trials. He could have easily doctored and created many such photos and even videos. It's called the magic of television.

Also the Soviets themselves were doing huge amounts of medical experimentation on their own people via the starvation and genocide. They were the ones who introduced water fluoridation to their population. If you're not aware, they were renowned for having many medical breakthroughs and lots of experimentation and data about longevity for decades. They made these discoveries by experimenting on live people. They merely shifted the blame to the Germans instead. The real victims were the Russians and Jews slaughtered by Stalin. The Germans were never guilty of these accusations. They were just a scapegoat.

2
flame_whip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crazy stuff. I deleted the comment, since I didn't mean to respond to yours, meant to respond to the other one. But it's amazing that you even know about this stuff. History is written by the victors.

3
flame_whip 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are right, there was a ton of intrigue in the Nazi leadership. I wouldn't call them the "good guys." But there's always two sides to every story. There was a major split in the Nazi movement, which is covered very well in a book called: The Strange Death of Adolf Hitler. Furthermore, Leon Degrelle wrote about it in his book called: Hitler Democrat. The Night of the Long Knives is covered extremely well in both of those books, no other material compares.

Also, Soviet Russia had FAR more blood on their hands. See my previous comments about the gulags.

This is an interesting video about Hitler's early life and artwork, as well as the aforementioned book: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6TQFrECvgQ

  • Source book: warning, this book is VERY graphic, but it gives lots of details about Hitler's personality, more than any other book: The Strange Death of Adolf Hitler

I also highly recommend you watch this documentary series: https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/hmv3AI5oVvJm/

The first three parts are especially recommended. The rest is unnecessary, but also informative.

Here is a very good article by Hitler's Jewish doctor, who tells about his early childhood and what he was like as a boy: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n3p27_bloch.html

This is a good book which retells WWII from the German perspective, but it holds no special treatment for the Nazis. It tells what both sides did in all the gory details: https://www.amazon.com/GERMANYS-WAR-Origins-Aftermath-Atrocities/dp/0982344899

I also highly recommend this book by Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof, 1939 - The War That Had Many Fathers. It utterly debunks the traditional idea that Germany was solely responsible for the outbreak of war.

7
flame_whip 7 points ago +8 / -1

Food for thought:

  • Anne Frank's diary mentions her Jewish family celebrating Christmas, yet skipping Passover, Purim, Rosh Hashanah, and Hanukkah. She said they not only ate, but made pork sausage whilst hiding in the attic from the Third Reich (NOT kosher!!). She also complains about her boyfriend Peter cursing with Jesus Christ's name. Newsflash: Jews don't worship Jesus, so they're perfectly allowed to curse with His name! This and lots of other weird anomalies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFaN0k3xLN0
  • How many times did six million Jews die before WWII? You tell me, I lost count: https://archive.org/details/SixMillionJews19151938
  • Were the camps really so terrible? Not according to these Jews who lived there: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nCkT31koqRo/
  • How about the absurdity of placing a soccer field right next to the gas chambers? I can just imagine the dialogue:

"Hey Bob, don't you see grandma heading towards the gas chamber over there?"

"Forget it, Joe. We gotta win this soccer game!!"

4
flame_whip 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gulag Archipelago actually illustrates this phenomenon in detail. If you read this essay by Eustace Mullins, you'll see exactly what happened: https://archive.org/details/mullins-e.-c.-theres-a-gulag-in-your-future-1976

On page 389, Volume Two of [The Gulag Archipelago], we find a very significant passage:

"But some transports of condemned zeks arrived too late, and they continued to arrive with five to ten people at a time. A detachment of killers would receive them at the Old Brickyard station and lead them to the old bathhouse to a booth lined with three or four layers of blankets inside. There the condemned prisoners were ordered to undress in the snow and enter the bath naked. Inside, they were shot with pistols. In the course of one and a half months about two hundred persons were destroyed in this way. The corpses were burned in the tundra."

In this passage, Solzhenitsyn is describing the execution of Trotskyite prisoners at a Moscow train station in April 1938. It sounds all too familiar, because hundreds of pages of sworn testimony describing these incidents were taken down at the Nuremberg Trials and used to condemn the legally elected officials of the German nation to be executed for "war crimes"! How did this come about? When the German Army made its lightning dash into Russia in June of 1941, the Soviet leaders realized that Jews in the captured border cities would be the first to collaborate with their conquerors. Stalin ordered all the Jews in the path of the German advance to be rounded up and hauled to the interior on cattle trains. Many of them were sealed, and most of them had no food or water. As a result, many thousands of Jews died in horrible circumstances. Also in the path of the German advance were a number of huge Soviet slave labor camps. There was no possibility of evacuating them, and the Russian guards herded prisoners into large groups and massacred them with machine gun fire. When the Germans captured these areas, they were stunned to find large mounds of unburied corpses.

In order to have proof of the savage mentality of the Communist commissars, the Germans methodically photographed the scenes of these massacres, and took statements from some survivors who had fled into the woods. At Nuremberg, in order to have a legal excuse for killing the captured Germans, the victors changed the statements and photos to read "German guards" where they had formerly read "Russian guards" and changed the locale of the massacres to read "Auschwitz", "Dachau" and other German camp areas instead of the true Russian ones.

Eustace worked at the Library of Congress for some 20 years and read thousands of books. So he would have actually had access to the original Nurmberg Trials transcripts (which were thousands of pages long) kept in their archives. You can view online facsimiles at the Library of Congress website here: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/NT_major-war-criminals.html

But, they're so enormous you'll never read it all. However, Eustace had a photographic memory. He had read large portions of the Nuremberg Trials, if not the whole thing, so when he read The Gulag Archipelago, he could compare his photographic memory of the Nuremberg Trials with the exact same stories occurring in the gulags. He did not make things up, and he was a brilliant scholar (contrary to popular opinion and the ADL's slander about him).

As u/fsoawesome pointed out also, Carlos W. Porter wrote a fascinating book called Made in Russia: The Holocaust (good book review, digital edition, hard copy). He actually digs through these very trial transcripts from Nuremberg and shows not only which ones were absurdly nonsensical, but which were directly manufactured in Russia. One of the very people in charge of manipulating these photographs, captions, and even making fakes, was Sergei Eisenstein, one of the only filmmakers in the USSR. It was a ruse from start to finish. Russia needed to explain where all the Jews' bodies went (killed in Gulags), and defeated Germany provided the perfect scapegoat.

Germany has also paid Israel hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars since WWII, due to this misplaced blame. Who'd want to get rid of such a sweet gig? Certainly not Israel. Check out this short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRrfnGvSJDw

3
flame_whip 3 points ago +4 / -1

Anyone have evidence that he's actually a Rothschild? He's obviously a controlled NWO puppet... just wondering specifically about the Rothschild bit.