contribute much more than you do, thoug
You contribute nothing except racist dogwhistkes for your ANTIFA faggot purple haired cadre.
"Bootlicker"
racist bootlickers.
Antifa confirmed.
Go rape some kids and try to take someone's gun so we can put you where you belong while mossad in the news calls it "racist" faggot.
some of the most unwelcoming and closed minded individuals I've ever seen
Like you
Say anything against Trump and you're immediately called a shill faggot and told to go back to reddit.
Go back to reddit, shill faggot.
Immaturity like this breeds
Guess we should pretend to be victims like a filthy jew commiting insurance fraud, huh? That's "maturity"
got banned for talking bad about Daddy Trump
On r/politics or the trump subreddit faggot? That's right bitch, shutup
into a racist, conservative echo chamber a
Unlike twitter, which is 1000 X's MORE racist and an communist echo chamber
the users are now free to be as “offensive”
Go touch kids somewhere else, epstein
Go rape some children, mossad
I haven't done any of those things
Advocate for an ideal world where everyone "shared"? You didn't do that?
fact that my family is bigger than I know and I will continue to care for everyone to join that family.
Then go farm for bolshevist jews for absolute free so they can continue to annex Palestinian land, rape children in hollywood, and attack Christians. You're beyond naive, you're willfully ignorant and proud as long as the jew plays to your ego.
bringing up Jews is very near sighted in my estimation
"Estimate" all you want. You can try to parrot my argument but "Desmond is amazing" disagrees with you, the evangelicals convinced to farm for the child raping bolsheviks disagree with you.
there are evil men in every sort of skin.
And you will bend over backwards to give them whatever they want so long as you get to post on your jew owned facebook about what a "good" christian you are.
you are equating me to a communist for suggesting we love one another in our hearts and our actions.
Be mad all you want. Just don't steal shit from people to give it to the bolshevist jew because they convinced you they're "gods chosen people".
Don't become a tool like the evangelicals farming for bolsheviks in the west bank because the jew talks big to you about "altruism". Do what's right for you and your family FIRST. How will you help anyone if you give away all your agency to the state?
I dont know how to copy quote
It's the "greater than" symbol before quoted text
would like to know how or what I assumed about you.
Not about me, about "sharing". Communism. If it was one or two people sure, nobody is arguing that. When we have a problem is entire countries of displaced people demanding other countries give them what they demand at whatever expense. It doesn't work on a big scale.
As far as you assuming im a commie
The "sharing" argument is pretty communist as I've explained.
sharing and caring have been around long before they
Right. We can do that without making it "mandatory" and putting people in the gulag because they offend you with the truth.
dont really know what the argument is anymore
Jesus was no pussy. "Turn the other cheek" does not mean to sit idly by and take whatever transgression against you with a smile. To sit around and pine for an "ideal world" where there's nothing but peace is as stupid as an "ideal world" where the jews don't starve so they steal the farm land from everyone else until they're all fucking cannibals.
Perhaps you are putting words in my mouth
Also you
Doesnt mean this will always work but imagine a world where the shop keeper loved enough to share and the people they helped then returned the favor when they were able.
Pretty communist. The bolsheviks murdered everyone they could in the republic of russia and locked them in cages/genocided them all in the name of "sharing". Your "ideal world" is one that ends in propaganda posters reminding people not to eat their children because they stole all the land from the farmers in the name of "sharing".
never professed love for me and mine at the expense of another.
I didn't say you did. I'm saying this is where your niave notions logically conclude. I'm saying you're incredibly short sighted to serve your ego, not Jesus.
do you feel peaceful in this world?
Yes and no. I'm unsure how to answer exactly.
I never stole
That's irrelevant. What we're discussing is a metaphor that explains doing something good FOR YOU out of "love" doesn't just hand waive away the evil you commit while doing so.
For example. The zionist occupation of palestine and the continued tensions (genocide) it is causing.
See, you're sitting here on your ass saying "peace love and unity, man" like some ignorant communist while the jew snarls his fangs at you. Bragging that he owns the temple mount and the holy sepulchre . He uses his media to turn everyone into edgelord communists who attack christians and/or homosexuals ie (Desmond is amazing )
Jesus was no pussyfoot. He kicked the money lenders out of the church and didn't do it with a "non violent sit in" with his purple haired communist cadre either.
You have been played.
Yeah right... You're telling me that somehow brain anatomy was so important to them that they made statuettes to represent brain anatomy?
It is an incredibly naive, simplistic, and self centered view of the world you have. Let's make an example.
Let's say there is a person who resorts to stealing food for his family. Obviously love to feed his family, but is it "love" for the shopkeeper? You say "the shopkeeper can take the hit" but what if it's hundreds of thieves who had dumbass children irresponsibly and act like it's everyone else's job to raise them?
Does saying "peace and love, man!" feed the shopkeepers family after he had everything stolen from him?
The virus is real. Wuhan lab, bill gates vaccine. Everything around it is manufactured. The death toll. The idea it's anywhere near as deadly as the common flu. Everything around it is bullshit.
Prove it, faggot
Continued
On the other hand, every step of the way you have been continuously using visceral language to describe me in an attempt to sidestep my arguments
I'm not "sidestepping" anything. You lying sack of shit. Stop accusing me of what you commit. I have evidence. You have literally some random polock. You believe the german when you agree with them yet call them liars when they say you're full of shit. Fucking cowardice. Calling a spade a spade is not "sidestepping"..
also am not in the practice of engaging in people blinded by their own hostility,
I'm not blinded by my hostility. I'm blinded by the sheer stupidity of someone calling forensic evidence "crackpots" while saying drunk, dog fucking, inbred, communist loving poles are the gold standard of evidence. I really wish this conversation went differently. Hopefully we can talk about UFOs or some shit in the future. I HAVE to break you down for this. I've fought with too many child raping israelis and am salty about their indoctrination, as you should be.
I really want you to realise we are all together in this fight against communism. You can't act like poland is a lion who will beat the wolf just because of your bravado. The fight is bigger than that. Poland was played and they played their part well. I truthfully wish this conversation went differently. It's aggravating and I really appreciate you working through my insults. Just stop pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining, please.
utilizing ad-homenim attacks is a logical fallacy
I told you. They aren't a crutch. I'm peppering them in for flavor.
Ok, "witness" testimony versus hard data. No insults. Who wins?
You simply can't or won't.
I have and don't particularly enjoy it. Please stop asking me to.
When did Germany beat all of the other animals? Don't forget, as well, that World War I was not Germany alone; not even close. It was Germans, Prussians (in Germany; ethnically and nationally distinct from Germany historically), Poles (In Germany's side of the partitioning, which happened ~100 years prior. They still nationally identified as Poles, by the way), the Austria-Hungary empire, and the (Islamic) Ottoman Empire.
Yes. It's a tragedy that people who called themselves brothers fought over machinations and propaganda while the pig sat back and waited to sweep Europe afterward, isn't it?
They were in a deadlock stalemate against the British and French in France.
No. Britain was in dire straits. Which is why they made the deal to get the eagle involved with the receipt being "the balfour declaration". Which went against their previous commitments.
MOST importantly, it was signed BY the Germans.
Only after they had been ganged up on by all the other animals because of the pig jews machinations, TWICE.
In the wake of the war, several nations were re-established, and measures to disarm and prevent further aggression from Germany were passed. One of these nations was Poland; a people that had been craving independence and freedom since their nation, one of the world's earliest and longest lasting representative governments was ganged up on and partitioned, in a very similar way you're claiming/describing Germany was.
Which I've been arguing was very much against poland's self interest in the long run. This isn't about poland, this is about communism and the establishment of palestine by any means necessary.
Do you have proof of any of this?
That's fair. Remember these are newspaper (jew owned) publications pushing poland to war. Any parallels to today? Are things starting to come together?
am explaining that establishing whether or not Poland was the aggressor was is crucial to answering those questions factually.
Ok. How am I "mixing up arguments" or whatever you said?
Which is an entirely separate topic
No. I'm talking about both Great Wars" I'm not pretending it started at the sequel.
Your arguments consistently took my expressions out of context
How? You keep accusing me without evidence. Then say you'll explain but trail off about "rhetorical questions"
instead of refuting them for what they were saying,
I'm using the quote tool, bud
a straw-man
Oh shit. Here we go..... Evidence? What "straw man"?
you did not read the arguments thoroughly or clearly
I have. You can stop trying to dismiss the fact I tore you apart and continue to do so.
source does not refute the existence of gas chambers
Yes it does. And I've provided more.
Find me the specific part of the video
Does it have to spell it out? It was an air raid shelter the bolsheviks poked holes in the ceiling of and called "chimneys" that aren't connected to any "furnace". And why the plumbing?
You did not ask about the validity
I did. Pardon my transgressions for not using the vocabulary befitting of someone with such a high regard of themselves.
Let me expand on that a little bit
All well and dandy. As I've said his word isn't law. The evidence is. He presents the evidence. That's it.
, the chemical analysis of the walls of the chamber does not refute the usage of the chamber
No, everything else about it does. Explain the math of having a "genocide factory" where you only kill a couple people a day.
even if they disproved the chimneys,
Yes, they do. If you have anything written after this I can't see it. Hopefully you're writing this down somewhere else and moving it over like I am.
they do not disprove the entirety of the claims about that camp, let alone the other campuses of that camp or the other camps.
Yes. They do. Can you prove otherwise besides pointing to one of your lying cousins?
Saying "I do" doesn't make it more true
Correct. Which is why I provided hard scientific evidence and you've said "but this random lying ass polock says he saw em!" Also why I've been shitting on you so hard. You should've addressed the chemical analysis of the lack of prussian blue staining. Instead you do what you accuse me of, hypocrite.
with facts that do not prove the overwhelming majority of the arguments you are making
How so? "sAyInG i dO dEOsNt mAKe iT hUuRr dhUUrHr"
If you have more facts, please present them
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=6
Until then, you don't, and saying you do doesn't change that.
Again, learn to fucking read.
I've provided far more evidence than a single "random Polock"
No you haven't. You're a damned liar. You started off being an asshole for me having hard evidence then deleted the comment.
Are you a team of government agents that can't get the story straight?
I provided three sources,
If you knew anything about investigations you would understand witness testimony is completely unreliable. It's not "the best" because it was some random polock.
And you say three but I think that's only one.
and those records can be carbon dated to verify their validity,
Dating, get this..... verifies the date. Not the claims. HFS logic is not your strong suit.
single greatest proof POSSIBLE
Why? Because it was said by a lying, thieving, vulture? Go fuck yourself.
Given that these writings come from some of the top officials, neither explanation makes much sense.
You haven't addressed the claims at Nuremberg of "human lamp shades" "human soap" or the perverted delusional claims of "masterbation death machines"
The "trials" at Nuremberg were a bigger shitshow than the "treaty" of versailles. You can't torture prisoners for false confessions.
he was a founding member of the Polish underground resistance
Sounds like a communist to me.
his official government report was signed by at least a half dozen other officials
Do they have anything to disprove the hard scientific evidence? Then you're all a bunch of lying thieves. "Th8s gUy sAyS iTs tRuE" huh? Get some self awareness. Holy fuck.
There were semi-regular updates form inside the camp,
From the theatre, soccer field, or the swimming pool?
wasn't just a random Pole
Fine. The biggest bitch of the pig jew. Some commie punk.
Two is an excerpt from a Wikipedia page (bad source, by the way, I'm surprised you trusted it)
I'm not "trusting" wikipedia. If you didn't understand wikipedia is simply an index. I was using multiple sourced examples (that's what the numbers are, genius. notation) to show that the beginning of the war is contested. And there's nobody left today who will really defend Germany in ww2, huh?
The conclusion is generally
What's the " general conclusion" on the masterbation death machines? The human lamp shades?
In fact, the source as you presented in and of itself contains a counterargument; the German population in the corridor was a "German minority
Just because the pig jew infiltrated and had his pet hopped up on "equality" and "democracy" doesn't mean shit. If we're talking strictly numbers here than Germany is bigger than poland, therefore should listen to whatever it says because "equality". Go fuck yourself.
This is simply false. Find me the quote and I will explain how that assessment is incorrect.
Yes, you said "that's retarded". Not me.
If you cannot distinguish between an argument and a person, I suggest you do not engage in debate
That goes double for you and your communist "proof".
From reading your response I can tell you didn't even take time to read what I wrote fully.
I did. I really do appreciate the time you take to correspond. It's incredibly aggravating, I wish it were more productive.
Quick recap. Correct me if I'm wrong. I provided evidence that the last 100 years of history are a lie. To which you responded saying "denying the holocaust is retarded" and "I'm Polish" as if it proves anything. If you didn't disregard all evidence to push one random polock because he says something that you like to hear then I wouldn't have attacked you for it.
I don't hate you because your polish. There's some I like, luke rudkowski is a national treasure, beautiful and amazing human being.
You, on the other hand, have the chutzpah to call people "retarded" for providing evidence while acting "holier than thou" telling me not to "resort to personal attacks" You disgust me with your attitude. You're a complete hypocrite.
You will not turn your nose up at me. Because I will take it and I will shove it the pile of shit your ancestors left on the floor. Is that clear?
Let's look at the world wars like animal farm. Germany beat all the other animals and just wanted peace. They wanted to go back to the way things were before the war. The conniving pig jew with britain got the eagle to beat germany by starting rumors in the pigs jew owned media. Also the conniving pig jew subverted russia. After it took all the animals to chase the wolf back to it's den poland, the retarded opportunistic vulture, squawked up begging for scraps. And the pig with his cohorts gave the vulture the scraps in front of the wolf's den. The vulture doesn't shut the fuck up about "my grandpappy told me this was HIS hill 500 fucking years ago SQUAWK! Im the pig jews bitch, look what the pig jew does for me SQUAWK!" But the wolf wasn't finished, it was biding it's time. Healing, waiting for the day to tear through that annoying vulture and go straight for the throat of the mutated half pig, half man, half bear.
And you expect what from me? Sympathy for the vulture? Poland rattled their sabres when they thought the rest of the planet was behind them. And when they got put back in their place they pretend to be a victim. Bitch shit.
It was the old world clashing with the new in more ways than one. Poland saw the empire building Germany had worked for and drunkenly pined for the "good old days" and retardedly thought "poland will rise again" because they're so self important. They wanted war with Germany and they played nice with communists. If you sit up with your adorable feathered helmets with muskets on horseback and dare Germany to take back what was stolen, don't be surprised when they do. Poland asked for it. Poland deserved every single god-damned minute of being rolled over by mechanized infantry.
I'm going to get back to tearing apart your lack of argument piece by piece.
Your comprehension drifted sections
How can you tell? Prove it.
and you blurred different arguments and statements
Where?
You did zero external research of your on on the sources I provided
I don't have to. The very second I heard "gas chambers" I can write that off as propaganda because the false warcrimes were constructed by the bolshevist jews after the war. I've proved that already.
and when I have repeatedly shown you that the sources of your "facts" openly contradict you, you just ignore it
You've shown nothing of the sort. You made a claim about a guardian article which I asked how it could be real if the guy changed his name multiple times. Its funny how you can do a deep dive on David cole yet you refuse to look at chemical analysis of the walls in the "gas chamber"
"I have facts!!!111!".
I do. You have....... a random polock. Congratulations, princess. The pinnacle of evidence.
Your only capacity for argument seems to be in refuting official documentation with personal attacks
You're wrong. I refuted your bullshit propaganda with SCIENCE.... while personally attacking you. To be fair, I don't think I started it. Hypocrite.
for example, the Polish-Soviet war of 1919 and 1920 which effectively proves no even remote or conceivable alliance between Poland and communism.
How does it prove anything? The "soviets" (bolshevist jews) were at war with constitutional russia. Does that prove russia was never communist?
for example; I go on throughout the remaining ~6000 characters detailing my sources; which are far greater and factually irrefutable; such as the writings of the Nazis themselves, at the time of actions which PROVE what happene
So you believe the Nazis when they say they infiltrated poland but not when they say poland attacked first? How completely unbiased. Funny how you can pick and choose when to believe people.
These are not disputed by David Cole,
Lol. And you haven't disputed that you're ancestors are dog fucking retards. Therefore, you're admitting your ancestors are dog fucking retards.
You want to keep playing these child ass games bitch? Try me, I'll go all fucking day.
and they can be factually verified through carbon dating of the paper.
Hahahahahahahaha. I'll just leave that up for you to ponder why it's retarded, you product of beastiality.
I will not continue to debate
You haven't debated anything. You've only had an emotional temper tantrum insisting we have to believe the poles and nobody else.
completely inept
It seems like you're trying to "dazzle" someone with your vocabulary. Trust me, it's backfiring.
AND unwilling to read the completeness of arguments
You don't have an argument. Again. The only thing you have is "you better believe the polocks". When you step off that retarded notion, I'll stop shitting on you for it. Deal?
The fact that you're unable or unwilling to even use proper grammar or spelling
Hahaha I honestly wrote all that before reading anything else. I'm tearing you apart piece by piece and I fucking called it.
You will not turn your gigantic inbred nose up at me you fucking coward because I will shove it back into the dirt where you belong. Where Germany put you, you thieving punk ass bitch.
You cannot say "I proved it" and have it be true;
Oh, but YOU can. Why is that? Because you're a weak inbred polock?
you must prove it using actual sources
Chemical analysis, census data, and the head curator of antiquities at the polish museum of auchwitz aren't "actual sources" but your syphilitic dog raping grandpappy is the absolute gold standard of evidence? Go fuck yourself
You have not done so, a
Yes. I have. you self important faggot.
I'll give you one more opportunity
You won't GIVE me anything, you bitch made coward ass son of a whore. I'll GIVE you $10,000 in dental work for free faggot.
Paint the entire picture it shows,
"Don't listen to anything except the inbred polocks" "entire picture"
Don't piecemeal it together quoting line by line in a vacuum,
What is this "in a vacuum", faggot? You're just saying random fucking words.
Restrain your temptation to make your only argument obscenities and personal attacks,
Again, that's not my argument. You are ignoring the evidence because it proves your ancestors are communist bitches. They played the game and lost. Boo fucking hoo. Go cry for the pig jew to steal some more land for you, coward.
that makes your argument look weak and is a complete logical fallacy.
There is no "logical fallacy" faggot. I'm not replacing evidence with personal attacks, I'm peppering them into evidence because you attacked me first, then have the chutzpah to pretend to be a victim. How stereotypically polish of you.
not, I'm done debating with you because you cannot present a logical argument.
You have no "debate". If you run away now you will concede that the BEST thing you can come up with is some random pole who's been proven full of shit with forensic analysis. Then you have the gall to tell me what's "logical"
I wonder how the jew could've played such a stupid fucking people. Life's mysteries, I guess.
Continued
Regardless; it would not be accepted as evidence,
No. Nothing YOU have is evidence. I have HARD SCIENTIFIC evidence you are refusing to acknowledge because your syphilitic grandpa told you you were some superman because YOU LOST.
There is no prove or disprove for most of it;
There is if youre not an inbred pole and are capable of reading.
Most evidence would be anecdotal
Hahahahahahahaha. Says the guy. Go fuck yourself, you completely lacking self awareness ass punk. Lol
"My inbred grandpa says it totally happened, give me shekels"
is very possible that figures are wrong, or
I proved it
While I have not personally read it, I will put forth as counter-evidence three different sources:
"This guy wrote a book" is NOT evidence.
would appreciate those here.
Your syphilitic grandpa is not "evidence". How many fucking times do I have to explain it to you?
THIS is where the jokes come from. It takes the collective mental capacity of ALL of you to screw in a fucking lightbulb.
mean proper documentation or evidence that proves each explicitly to the contrary.
You can't disprove a negative, faggot. Maybe you should figure out how to logic before pretending to be a historian just because you're the product if inbreeding.
Witold Pilecki's report is not Communist propaganda
The fact that you have to say that.....
Apologies for any errors or mistakes;
Then why do you keep making them?
Well, thanks for taking the time to write this up.
these are some of the most crucial documents in understanding what happened in Poland without going through German or Soviet sources
Shouldn't we use all sources to get a more complete picture? Obviously the bolsheviks have a penchant for "manufacturing" warcrimes which needs to be accounted for.
Was Germany completely in the right, and just being interfered with?" or "Was Poland allied to Communism?" and so on.
As I've said, the only crime of germany is that of being successful. And yes, poland was "allied" with communism. Wether it was by subversion or otherwise there were communists in poland and they wanted war with Germany.
Poland was on high alert in the 1930s because of the rising threat of aggression from Germany, with good reason: Here is a map of German expansion prior to the war going hot; The orange is territory that Germany started with, post Versailles.
What about BEFORE versailles? Was the danzig corridor german before that? "Danzig" doesn't sound very polish to me, sounds like a german village name. I've already stated the rest of the planet got together to "slap down" Germany for basically doing what genghis khan did to Asia and connected disparate Germanic people to a successful powerhouse.
From the wiki on "bloody sunday"
"The Polish historians point out that since these losses occurred during actual combat, most of the civilian losses should be attributed to accidents common in urban combat conditions; they argue that civilian losses might have occurred when the town was attacked by the German air force (Luftwaffe).[20] Strafing of civilians in the town by the Luftwaffe is confirmed by German witnesses.[30] Nazi propaganda reinforced Polish perceptions of the German minority as hostile, and during the invasion reported that the German minority was aiding the forces. This contributed to Polish misconceptions, as the Poles were expecting the German minority to be actively hostile.[31]
An even bigger debate in the scholarship concerned the question whether—as the Polish historiography suggests—there were indeed any members of a German fifth column in the city who opened fire on the Polish troops (and if so, whether they were composed of members of the Bydgoszcz German minority or not), or whether—as critics among the German historiography argue—Polish troops (or panicking civilians) overreacted in the confusion and targeted innocent German civilians.[32] This debate has been resolved by investigation of German archives, which confirmed existence of several diversion and saboteur groups in Bydgoszcz overseen by intelligence organizations by Nazi Germany [33] Among the Germans killed in the fighting historians identified Otto Niefeldt who was an Abwehr agent from Szczecin[9] The account of Peter Nasarski alias Aurich has been called by Harry Gordon[31] one of the most thorough German accounts; his work is however generally rejected in Poland,[27] perhaps because he indiscriminately used witness statements collected by Nazi officials.[34] According to Nasarski, after police forces retreated from Bydgoszcz, agitated Polish civilians accused many Germans of assaulting Polish soldiers and executed them and any Poles who stood up in their defence.[31] Rasmus attributes the situation to confusion and the disorganised state of the Polish forces in the city.[28]
Von Frentz wrote that "In Bydgoszcz, the event was probably caused by confusion among the rapidly retreating soldiers, a general breakdown in public order and panic among the Polish majority after two German air raids and the discovery of a small reconnaissance group of the German Army on the previous day."[20] He quotes Nazi German reports about the civilian victims and atrocities, later corroborated by a Red Cross commission that the Nazis invited to the scene.[20] Von Frentz also noted that eyewitness accounts of atrocities committed against the German population are as unreliable as Polish accounts of the fifth columnists.[20] While authors like Blanke write that no ethnic Germans are known to have spoken of participation in that event, by 2007 Nazi documents were uncovered confirming that assistance, supplies and aid were given to both German saboteurs and their families[28][35] In the post-war collaboration trials, no ethnic German was charged in relation to Bloody Sunday.[20][31] Another counterargument that was made to the fifth column theory is that Polish troops were being targeted by advance units of the German regular army (Heer), or that the shots were fired by Polish soldiers in the confusion of the mass withdrawal.[28] Von Frentz claims that Polish troops and civilians massacred German civilians due to confusion.[20] Polish historians feel the German historiography is based on Nazi German sources, ignoring numerous Polish sources.[36
We can clearly see that poles have a propensity to completely disregard facts of history to push their egocentric supremacy. The Germans just say "it was Germany before the war and we want it back. They're torturing our people". The very existence of a "corridor" completely shatters your antigerman narrative.
Let's get this straight right now. The only reason the poles had any level of control over the territory was PRECISELY because of the fake "treaty" at versailles which gave them the land for being sore losers. You can't start history at fucking WW2 and pretend you're being unbiased.
the Germans demanded Czechoslovakia surrender the Sudetenland, a region inhabited primarily by the Sudeten Germans
Just like the Germans in danzig "poland", huh?
continuing on the path of expansion
Another way to say it would be "liberate occupied german territory"
Germany now looked to the East;
Germany ONLY looked to the east. Which is precisely why, when ready to take britain in ww1 offered to go back to the way things were before the war. Then the balfour declaration was signed which lead to versailles and so on. Germany saved the rest of europe from communism, for a short time.
it was Poland's only significant port and an absolutely critical trade hub to the nation.
So is ukraine to russia, yet I doubt you'll be foaming at the mouth supporting Russian annexation of ukrainian land.
It was not initiated by Poland
Arguable. The poles were on german land. They DID take what they could in the "treaty" then pretend to be innocent. That's bitch shit. If you're trying to institute an ancient "polish empire" then you sit there on your horse with feathers in your helmet and you take the full force of mechanized infantry and don't say shit. How incredibly jewish it is to steal whatever you can then pretend to be a "victim"?
war began two days later.
Again, which is why hitler had the red cross come in to do independent investigations and the poles just say "lies!!!!"?
Sounds legit
Poland actually attempted to mobilize sooner;
This disproves your narrative of "german expansion", doesn't it?
and wanted to defend against it.
That's called aggression. Preemptive "defense" is an attack. The poles aren't the innocent bystander you've been lead to believe simply because they lost.
This is where the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact comes in. As per the agreement, Germany wasn't the only country to invade Poland; the Soviets invaded from the east shortly after the Germans invaded from the West. As strong as it's resistance was, Poland had no chance to defend against both powers, given that their primary defensive lines were rivers, which, obviously, can't be used for defense both ways. That should be the final nail in the coffin of the idea that the Polish government might somehow be sympathetic to or allied with Communism
That's not a "nail in the coffin". That proves nothing. You did business with communists and in typical bolshevist jew fashion, they played you. You played the game and lost. Sore losers. Should've allied with Germany against communism but like I said, fever dreams of ancient polish empire and suckling at the teat of versailles, they got what they asked for.
the importance of the establishment of the motivations and allegiances of the Polish government lies in the understanding and interpretation of the actions of the Polish people and government,
Which was "occupy Germany and kill Germans"
as well as the original documentation of the time
Which you disregard if they aren't syphilitic poles entertaining fever dreams.
there's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews" [12:56]; something that is simply not true.
You can't state that matter of factly. You need evidence. I have it. You don't. Get evidence or get over yourself.
There is documentation from the Polish underground de
"But the poles say they own the planet. Why? Because they cant win a war, or course!"
I need actual evidence. Not "my inbred grandfather told me while stealing shekels" OK, pal?
Pilecki devised and presented a plan to infiltrate Auschwitz, gather intelligence, and organize the inmates to resist.
What you mean to say is "a bolshevist jew from russia said the jews are TOTALLY innocent.
There are no "gas chambers". The "crematorium" is a post war soviet construction and you try to source a soviet saying "believe me" as "evidence". Good Lord, the chutzpah of you bullshit artists.
this documentary, as per admittance in the documentary, is not proof that the Holocaust didn't happen.
Doesn't matter what the narrator states. Fact is this proves it's all manufactured. Germany tied to move them to Madagascar. Why don't you explain "the Madagascar plan" and how that fits into your notion of "homicidal gas chambers". Or the lack of any forensic evidence indicating mass death at Auchwitz?
"But this pole says the poles will rule the world!!!!"
That's the stereotypical "polish" attitude the communists and their cohorts in the allied powers took advantage of.
That said, as I implied before, the two greatest types of evidence we possess, and, frankly, the only evidence possible and trustworthy, is documentation from the time and reports from those that were there.
Youre wrong. "My grandpappy says give him shekels" is not "evidence". In fact, the ACTUAL evidence we DO have says the "gas chambers" are a post war soviet construction for the purpose of warcrime propaganda. "My syphilitic inbred grandpa" doesn't "debunk" the lack of prussian blue staining in the "crematorium", genius.
there is significant room for confused distortion
But not room for german claims of polish aggression, right hypocrite?
is why the Pilecki report is valuable
It's not valuable. It's certified propaganda because there were never any "gas chambers". POST WAR SOVIET CONSTRUCTION
no physical instance of a gas chamber would be proof to one that is truly skeptical
Bullshit. You're projecting your pole ignorance. The fact that they're lying about the gas chamber is proof that there was a gas chamber? Go fuck yourself. I haven't seen mental gymnastics this stupid since R Kelly claimed he was being "attacked" for being a pedophile rapist.
AND THERE IS NO "PHYSICAL INSTANCE"
POST
WAR
SOVIET
CONSTRUCTION
capice?
if the Soviets had staged the whole thing,
I provided all the evidence to prove that. Keep crying "fake news!"
would it be hard to believe that they would have made a gas chamber themselves, executed people in it, and then presented it as evidence?
Yes. Because again.
POST
WAR
SOVIET
CONSTRUCTION
How many poles does it take to read a fucking sentence?
why wouldn't they have gone more over the top?
You mean like telling people they made "human soap" and "human lamp shades"? Or what about the Nazi "masterbation death machines" that TOTALLY existed. You better believe it, otherwise you're a rAcIsT.
Get fucking real, dude.
Continued
There are definitely occult connections to the rapid development of technology. Sounds "out there" saying it so matter of factly.
I made a post which talked about rear admiral herbert knowles and his connections to UFOs. It's on richard Hoagland's podcast, so it isn't the easiest format. By researcher christopher knowles, no connection.
https://secretsun.blogspot.com/2019/06/lucifers-technology-revisited-plus.html?
Antifa confirmed