Their incompetence is next level.

Increasingly, credible people are noting that the purported "omicron" strain is wildly different in its "evolution" and likely "manmade".

What does this mean? Yet ANOTHER frankenvirus was dumped on the population and Mother Nature quickly dispatched it, per usual.

Mother Nature does NOT tolerate these frankenviruses. This has always been really clear to me, which is why I've never feared an actual "deadly" staged "virus" outbreak. It's simply not possible.

That's why they have to rely on media/governments to prop of the illusion of "deadly viruses."

The Omicron thing is baffling. They risk EVERYTHING by putting their eggs in the Omicron basket. Perhaps I'm given the sheep too much credit, but even THEY appear to be struck with the extreme cognitive dissonance that NO DEATHS have been attributed to Omicron.

That's a powerful talking point to take down the "pandemic."

As long as we can meme "alec baldwin is deadlier than Omicron" it highlights their extreme hypocrisy and how utterly farcical this "pandemic" truly is.

Did they take a massive gamble with Omicron...and lose AGAIN?

In early 2020, I started to realize that their plan had ALREADY failed because their "virus" wasn't deadly enough. Obviously, they planned for this by causing as many deaths from medical malpractice as possible to give the illusion of a pandemic.

But this method can only be sustained for so long...the vulnerable, impressionable, and weak have already been sacrificed in the first "wave" of propaganda.

They need new deceptions now, but they risk blowing apart the entire scam if people simply wake up.

Or...are they purposefully blowing up the pandemic narrative via omicron because they realized it's failing? Then why go full "shut down" over a phantom (again) and risk your population waking up and pushing back?

I recognize the possibility that they WANT us to lose faith in the "old" system so they can swoop in as saviors for the "new."

But...that won't go well for them either. People aren't going to forgive and forget the COVID crime against humanity so easily.

With "delta" they at least had deaths.

Now they are screaming themselves silly into irrelevancy.

I know it might not feel like this in some of the more repressive COVID regions right now, but that's because those places are still operating as if the "plan" were working.

The plan isn't working. It's completely breaking down in front of us.

People aren't just waking up to the COVID scam...

They're waking up to the VACCINE scam and the MEDICAL scam.

This is the opportunity of a LIFETIME for us...for humanity.

Only a couple years ago, I realized that "vaccines" were the single most important issue of our time, but I felt it would take an Act of God to rouse humanity from its Vaccinated Slumber.

I think "COVID" just might be what I prayed for...

The COVID hoax was meant to plunge us into permanent tyranny, but it ultimately may end up liberating us after all...

• What risks do public health agencies face if the public, media, and/or political leaders feel that information about potential treatment options is being withheld? (pg. 10)

• What kinds of outreach could public health agencies perform in advance of a crisis to mitigate any perceived lack of transparency? If such a perception emerges in the crisis, then how might it be defused? (pg. 10)

• How might federal health authorities avoid people possibly seeing an expedited SPARS vaccine development and testing process as somehow “rushed” and inherently flawed, even though that process still meets the same safety and efficacy standards as any other vaccine? (pg. 13)

• What are the potential consequences of health officials over- reassuring the public about the potential risks of a novel SPARS vaccine when long-term effects are not yet known? (pg. 13)

• What MCM (Medical Countermeasure) communication challenges and opportunities are likely to emerge among up-and-coming youth audiences who are avid consumers of interactive and visual forms of information? (pg. 22)

• Given the ability of powerful, popular figures to reinforce or to undermine public health messages, what steps might health authorities—at either national or local levels—take to reverse the negative effects...? (pg. 28)

• Why is active monitoring of the “information sea” in which the public is swimming critical to the efforts of authorities to create conditions and provide information that support recommended public health behaviors? (pg. 39)

• How might a strong social media presence allow the federal government—and public health officials more broadly—to anticipate potential communication issues (eg, privacy concerns over using EHR (Electronic Health Records) data to direct vaccination efforts) before they become full-fledged crises? (pg. 39)

• What kinds of pre-crisis partnerships and alliances with intermediary groups and/or opinion leaders might have helped to reduce the likelihood and mitigate the impact of anti-Corovax sentiments among specific minority groups? (pg. 48)

• Why were partnerships between the federal government and the information technology industry, including a number of social media companies, so vital to increasing overall uptake of the Corovax vaccine? (pg. 58)

• What communication strategies might be effective at overcoming the “echo-chamber” effect over the course of the SPARS outbreak? What pre-crisis measures, if any, might have been useful to dampen the “echo-chamber” effect? (pg. 58)

• Despite the uncertain science about the link between Coravax and the reported neurological symptoms, why should health officials still communicate with compassion and genuine sympathy toward those in the vaccinated population who experience medical issues subsequent to being vaccinated? (pg. 62)

• Given the uncertain long-term safety profile of the Corovax vaccine, why are both science and sympathy necessary when communicating about a possible correlation between vaccination and adverse events? (pg. 65)

• What benefits might arise if health authorities publicly share what they have learned from MCM use during the health emergency (including response missteps and successes) and communicate how government agencies plan to evolve on the basis of that information? (pg. 66)