8
axolotl_peyotl 8 points ago +8 / -0

This story is so perverse and disgusting it's almost like manufactured outrage.

It's becoming apparent that humanity is under assault from a parasitic hive mind entity that wants to turn people into thoughtless, sexless, amorphous husks of a human being.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

A third round of subpoenas issued last week by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol has revealed the committee’s investigation for what it is: a brazen attack on the First Amendment rights of peaceful, law-abiding Americans.

Indeed, it’s not too much to say that the committee’s targeting of ordinary Americans poses a far greater threat to freedom and democracy than the Capitol riot ever did.

Why? Because the subpoenas were issued to a pair of private citizens, right-wing activist Ali Alexander and a man named Nathan Martin, as well as a group the men were associated with called Stop the Steal, which had applied for and received a permit from the U.S. Capitol Police to hold a rally on the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6.

Ali and Martin didn’t take part in the riot and have no connection to it. Both men were indeed present at the Capitol grounds that day, along with hundreds of thousands of other people, to host a rally for which, I repeat, their organization applied for and received a permit from U.S. Capitol Police. But their permitted event never even took place.

As Martin told me back in January, about a week after the riot, he was setting up for the event when he saw people entering the U.S. Capitol building from a side door, which didn’t seem right to him. Shortly thereafter, Martin received a text that the event was canceled and he left the Capitol grounds. He didn’t find out about the riot and the breach of the Capitol until he got back to his hotel room later that day.

Martin, an Iraq War veteran and city councilman in Shelby, Ohio, was much like the vast majority of people who came to Washington, D.C., to protest the election in January. He wasn’t there to cause trouble or incite violence, and he didn’t think the protest would change the outcome of the election. His hope, he told me, was that Republican lawmakers would put their objections on the record and go through claims of election fraud “line by line,” especially from states where instances of fraud and irregularities were well-documented.

“I didn’t have any delusions of grandeur that Vice President Pence would come swooping in and change the results or anything like that,” he said. “Although there had been some constitutional talk about whether that was allowed or not, I didn’t feel constitutionally that there was room for that.”

That is, Martin expected Jan. 6 to be what the overwhelming majority of protesters that day expected it to be: a peaceful, orderly, and permitted demonstration at the U.S. Capitol to make their voices heard. The corporate media’s attempt to smear every person who was present on the Capitol grounds that day as an “insurrectionist” is flatly appalling and utterly fantastical.

But it hasn’t stopped them from trying. Martin and other permit applicants for planned rallies on Jan. 6 at the Capitol grounds were badly misrepresented in a BuzzFeed article last month, portrayed as shadowy figures who were evasive or deceptive in their permit applications and conversations with Capitol Police.

By contrast, what the permit applications, which BuzzFeed obtained through a lawsuit against the Capitol Police, and BuzzFeed’s own reporting reveal is that a number of unaffiliated groups applied for and received permits to hold various rallies on the sprawling Capitol grounds that day. Martin told BuzzFeed he hadn’t seen the permit application and didn’t know why his name was on it, and it appears that communications between event organizers was not without some confusion in the weeks leading up to the event — which you would expect with a hastily planned event with many moving parts.

But there is so far zero evidence any of these organizers had anything to do with the comparatively small number of people who used the occasion to assault police and breach the U.S. Capitol itself. Tens of thousands of people, possibly more, were on the Capitol grounds that day. Yet nine months after the riot, fewer than 200 people have been charged with assaulting Capitol Police officers and the vast majority of the 650 named defendants are being charged with misdemeanor trespass or other minor violations that carry no prison time.

Nevertheless, last week after news broke of the Select Committee’s subpoenas, nearly the entire corporate press, as if with one voice, lumped in Martin and Alexander, who have been charged with nothing, with the rioters.

If our news media had any interest in holding power to account, the headlines and coverage would have focused instead on how Democratic lawmakers on the committee, together with NeverTrump GOP Reps. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., are using their subpoena powers to target law-abiding Americans who wished to exercise their right to peacefully assemble and protest.

Let’s be clear on this point. Since its inception, the Select Committee has amounted to a show-trial for House Democrats and leading NeverTrumpers who are attempting to make examples out of ordinary citizens who dared to protest the election, just as President Biden’s Justice Department is throwing the book at anyone connected to the events of Jan. 6 to make examples of them.

The message is clear: if you protest, if you exercise your First Amendment rights for a cause that those in power have not approved, you will be targeted by the government, smeared and harassed by the media, and made into a spectacle — pour encourager les autres.

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

As my readers know, I’ve been proving, for the past year, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. Therefore, the whole issue of immunity is a non-starter. Immune to what? To a phantom. A myth. A superstition. A fairy tale. A collective hallucination.

NEVERTHELESS, I make frequent forays into the fantasy bubble-world, where millions and millions of people believe the virus is real, the case numbers are real, and the vaccine is relevant. I do this to point out the ridiculous contradictions and internal inconsistencies and lies within that bubble.

I’m making another such foray now. For the purposes of argument only, I’ll assume the virus is real and viral immunity is real and discussion about the vaccine is relevant.

A key question within the bubble: is naturally acquired immunity, achieved through infection by the virus, equivalent to, or better than, immunity acquired as a result of vaccination?

The answer to that question is vital for the pro-vaxx mafia. They MUST claim natural immunity is inferior. Otherwise, their goose is cooked.

Otherwise, their whole brutal campaign to force shots into arms is doomed.

Enter Senator Rand Paul. The other day, in a hearing, he took Biden’s Health and Human Services Secretary, Xavier Becerra, to the woodshed, to the cleaners, to school.

Infowars reporter Steve Watson wrote a piece covering Rand Paul’s merciless critique:

“Referring to a recent Israeli study that found vaccinated people are up to seven times more likely to get COVID-19 than those who have natural immunity, Paul told Becerra that Americans should be allowed to take a ‘Look at a study with 2.5 million people and say you know what? Looks like my [natural] immunity is as good as the vaccine’ or not.”

“’Maybe in a free country, I ought to be able to make that decision,’ Paul urged.”

“’Instead, you’ve chosen to travel the country calling people like Johnathan Isaac, and others, myself included, flat-earthers,’ the Senator continued, adding ‘We find that very insulting. It goes against the science’.”

“Paul then asked Becerra if he was a qualified medical doctor, knowing that he isn’t.”

“’So you’re not a medical doctor. Do you have a science degree?’ Paul further questioned, knowing that Becerra doesn’t.”

“’You alone are on high and you’ve made these decisions, a lawyer with no scientific background, no medical degree…this is an arrogance coupled with an authoritarianism that is unseemly and un-American,’ Paul blasted.

“’You sir, are the one ignoring the science. The vast preponderance of scientific studies, dozens and dozens, show robust, long-lasting [natural] immunity after infection,’ the Senator further charged, demanding that Becerra should apologise for being dishonest.”

If natural immunity is superior to vaccine-acquired immunity, then millions and millions of people who have been labeled “COVID cases” and recovered…don’t need the vaccine.

Oops.

Wait. There’s more. A few months ago, the FDA issued a strange edict that confused many medical professionals. The agency suddenly announced that COVID antibody tests would no longer be considered useful or accurate.

The hidden reason for that decision is becoming clear. Widespread antibody testing would reveal that an EXTRAORDINARY number of people developed viral infections and recovered. A far greater number than anyone expected or assumed. They have antibodies against the virus and they’re healthy.

And THAT revelation would sink the pro-vaxx ship to the bottom of the sea. Because, obviously, all those antibody-positive people developed natural immunity to the virus and have no need for a vaccine.

Then, on top of all this, the PCR test, when run at a sensitivity of 35 cycles or above, also indicates millions and millions of people are infected by the virus and recover nicely. THOSE people as well would need no vaccine.

Getting the picture?

The total tonnage of scientific bullshit required to argue that everyone should be vaccinated is titanic.

Hence, we have Fauci, sold-out talking news heads, vaccine mandates, lying doctors, lying public health officials, etc.

It would not surprise me at all if it turned out that 80-90 percent of the population—subjected to testing and re-testing—at one time or another qualified as COVID cases—and recovered nicely or were never sick in the first place…AND THEREFORE HAVE NO NEED FOR A VACCINE.

—And that concludes today’s episode of Lunatics on the Loose inside the Mad Mad World Where People Believe the Virus is Real and the Vaccine is Relevant and Necessary. As I say, I make forays into that world to demonstrate the contradictions and lies the liars are spouting, even on their own terms.

The liars are no more reliable than drunks in a bar at 2AM.

However, they’re a lot more dangerous.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great post! I'll add:

Gravity is a push not a pull. Nikola Tesla, Thomas Townsend Brown, Tom Van Flandern and an entirely new approach to gravity that has been marginalized and swallowed up by black-ops and the Breakaway Civilization for a century.

1
axolotl_peyotl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you asking me a question? I asked you a question. Why do you "like" this user who is being a faggot?

4
axolotl_peyotl 4 points ago +4 / -0

The pilot emailed following the first Southwest post today (and provided his SWA ID to prove his identity). He asked that I paraphrase the email.

Essentially, the union cannot organize or even acknowledge the sickout, because doing so would make it an illegal job action. Years ago, Southwest and its pilots had a rough negotiation, and the union would not even let the pilots internally discuss the possibility of working-to-rule (which would have slowed Southwest to a crawl).

But at the moment the pilots don’t even have to talk to each other about what they’re doing. The anger internally - not just among pilots but other Southwest workers - is enormous. The tough prior negotiations notwithstanding, Southwest has a history of decent labor relations, and workers believe the company should stand up for them against the mandate. Telling pilots in particular to comply or face termination has backfired.

Meanwhile, Southwest has more flexibility than it has acknowledged. Federal contracts represent about 3 percent of its revenue, but even the Biden administration CANNOT alter existing contracts (please note, I have not checked this, though it seems reasonable); Southwest is only at risk of losing future contracts.

This pilot believes that the fact that the airlines received $25 billion in no-strings-attached cash for “payroll support” last year (as well another $25 billion in loans) has made them particularly reluctant to stand up to the Biden administration. Southwest’s CEO, Gary Kelly, may be in an especially tough spot since he is the head of the airline lobbying group.

Finally: This pilot says he loves Southwest and finds the crisis painful but feels that if this is the only way Americans can stand up to these mandates, then let the chips fall.

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why? Instead of simply adding positive contributions to the discussion, they engaged in reddit-level faggotry and pettiness.

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

What a strange comment.

No-Sourcing

@JackPosobiec is literally included in the screenshot, with the time and date. That's the source.

Do you think people don't know how twitter functions in 2021? It's very odd to claim I didn't provide a source when it's right there.

No-Sourcing-By-Win-Threadstarters resistance

Did you just make this up? What are you talking about? What are you referring to?

I had to scroll down past dozens of tweets

So?

Not that you'd know if the OP had his way, lol.

Wtf is this? If I had my way?

I've been posting hundreds of twitter links since the conception of this place. A couple of days ago, a user complained that we were giving twitter too much traffic, and we should try keeping activity here on .win.

Also, twitter removes posts and images all the time, so it's best if the image itself is stored on .win for posterity.

I thought that sounded reasonable, so I've switched it up for the last couple of days.

It's much more time consuming for me to screenshot the tweet, edit it, and reupload as an image than to just directly link to twitter...I only did it because I thought it was better for the community.

And yet here you come, and take multiple swipes at me for my troubles?

That's some grade-A reddit faggotry if I've ever seen it.

Sure the mod who posted this is savvy enough to know that merely visiting twitter doesn't earn them a single penny, riiiight?

lol wtf is this bullshit. pure TMOR-level lunacy. Why are you passive aggressively talking like this? It's stupidly boring at this point.

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

The video you linked is good but summarizes another youtube channel which is better (he links it I think).

I recommend watching all of the videos on the other crater earth channel chronologically.

He ends up adjusting his theories over time with new info so not everything in the early videos is "definitive."

There's SUCH AN INDUSTRY wr to flat earth. That's a CLUE. That means SOMETHING is going on, and "flat earth" is a clever distraction.

Crater earth on a larger (round!) planet checks a disturbing number of boxes. I'm obsessed with this theory atm, I find it fantastically elegant.

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think so.

Unironically.

I've just taken a deep dive into this theory and it explains a LOT. Not everything, but a LOT. I think it's close to the truth.

Keep an open mind folks.

Thanks OP, I may do a megathread on this topic very soon.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›