So, when you called me a liar multiple times, I won.

Cool.

Thanks for your input.

Perhaps I should all find a better place than this then.

Shit, PMs aren't even private, and they make no illusion about it.

Mods don't care to know or divulge who actually owns it. Mod has called me a LIAR multiple times (for telling the truth), and PutinLovesCats even disappeared just after he talked to the current mod about my "lying". It's all in their comment histories. Mods threatened me with banning for talking about shills.

Should I go on?

I doubt anyone was 'silenced' for disagreement.

I gave an example in the thread. Guy made a second account and then really got canned quick (mocking the mods is a no-no but the plebs can be mocked relentlessly). Questionable followed me from thread to thread mocking me, for days. I don't care. But if he did that to a mod...gone in a second.

ka-ching

kachinka

From one doll to the next. I guess the other is a toy more than a doll.

Ever see the old Mark Twain claymation film? They had a part with kachinkas that was pretty cool.

They sure seem to babysit certain things though. That's the point. It's not about me, ya know?

I think chess is overblown I bit.

Also, it seems like it was actually India...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga

Manly was 33 degree freemasons. he did a great job,

Ok, sure. But you don't know what he did in secret. And therein lies the inherent issue. And Hall wasn't avoiding torture from the Catholic Church. Neither was Washington.

yet freemasons have been always evil?

Pretty much, yeah.

glorian.org

Yeah, not my cup of tea. I tend to avoid websites based on one dude. I've literally talked to Lilith. I could probably teach them some things.

I've also been around a long time, so I've seen a majority of that stuff in other contexts as well.

Yeah, like in one passage on ETs on the site, they talk about how fearless Columbus was, but people had traveled to America well before him. Like many thousand years before him.

I also like to research things more spontaneously. Like I don't deny that there is validity to astrology, tarot, even "sex magic" which isn't really magic. Most of that stuff is actually just dogma.

Man, no joke, one of my coworkers made a calligraphic wall hanging of Jung's name.

I'm like...I don't think you know the full story of that dude.

Also they were celibates, this is what the apron originally represented to begin with.

I don't think that is the case at all. I mean them being celibates.

And just because Manly P Hall wrote stuff, that doesn't absolve Washington or clear his name. They keep secrets for a reason. It's not rocket science.

why did they give to americans guns then? slaves can't own guns, free man can.

Because they know that even with a public that has guns, they have superior organization.

It's quite an illusory "freedom". Meanwhile, their "freedom" is complete lawlessness. Hunter Biden et al.

Oh, those 55,000 are probably airport terminals, train stations, and people in comas at hospitals.

That'd be my guess.

Yeah, but did Jesus himself carry a sword? No, he had a "sword of iron" that came out of his mouth. Not everyone is fit to fight, Jesus included.

But I do NOT agree that there were dark forces in Jesus' time, dark forces now, but Washington and other MASONS kept the darkness at bay.

Don't believe that for a second, and there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

That's why there was an Anti-Masonic Party in the U.S. Actually the first "third party" in American politics.

Sounds like a Weeble Wobble.

Washington believed that you should avoid dogma, but he was a Mason?

Those two completely clash.

He's a liar and a fake.

USE THE FUCKING SWORD TO DECAPITATE THE SATANISTS WHO RAPE KIDS THAT TOOK OVER THE WESTERN GOVERNMENTS

So Washington decapitated Satanists back in the day?

thought of Rome.

But did they dress in togas?

How come there's no sign of his Christianity?

Because he probably wasn't really a Christian.

That's a good one. And the suggestions only get bolder as former ones fail or become stale.

Did you see CNN's viewership numbers?

55,000

LOL

I'm not too familiar with Persia, but I'm pretty sure that the Silk Road worked to their advantage.

I was just reading about the Silk Road, and guess what?

Some Jewish people teamed up with the Khazarian Turks to do trade on the Silk Road. And the wiki article speaks rather glowingly about the Silk Road, when there was rampant slavery, trafficking, and smuggling.

That's why the mod ignored this comment I reported?

Questionable 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

Hello? u/Xaviermgk/ u/newfunturistic/? Weren't you two just in here tag teaming me, like a pair of freshly awakened homos in the restroom of transgender dance club? Come on back and give old papa a reach around won't you fellas?

That's attacking the argument?

Plus he "tried" to tag us, but they don't have notifications on here. Even I knew that. LOL

Yes, I've seen that letter like a dozen times.

I believe it is cover, because that's the ONLY thing that people bring up on the matter.

Seems quite dubious.

I don't think Washington was a good guy, to be completely clear.

I'd not say smart but shrewd.

There's a distinction to be made there.

They like to "bend the rules" to their advantage.

Reminds me of Jamie Gold winning the world series of poker.

Shrewd also has an implicit coldness to it.

And hey, if there are rules, well, fuck 'em. See my post on Hitzig. Same goes for many Harvard researchers. Look at Timothy Leary and "Ram Dass". Regardless of how you feel about psychedelics...illegal experimentation is illegal experimentation.

He won't act like that towards the mods. Ever.

Pretty selective, eh?

Where did I say they were?

She literally wants to use Nazi technology.

How does it feel to be the only one supporting Nazis here?

Must be lonely.

Allmodsarefags got banned, and that guy was pretty decent. He had posts removed. The mod log says it all.

He was far more respectful than some of the other users here. Certain types of authority do not like being questioned.

And there is selective enforcement on comments in general, for sure.