-3
TwoBearArms -3 points ago +1 / -4

Not necessarily. They don’t owe it to anyone to prove anything.

I haven’t seen any evidence of her death, so why entertain the notion?

-1
TwoBearArms -1 points ago +1 / -2

Right but at some point you have to analyze the situation if it were true. If she’s dead, or if something was wrong, why aren’t her coworkers talking about it? Why isn’t her family talking about it?

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah. Okay I see the confusion. When I said “incident,” I meant her physically fainting. I don’t know if that interview was day if or not, because to me it didn’t seem all that relevant.

I figured that would be enough to show that she’s doing fine, since if the vaccine affected her so badly it’d be incredibly rare for someone to faint, be on video to make a full recovery and discuss that passing out is something that is not uncommon for her, and then suddenly things go south again. That whole timeline just doesn’t add up.

If work is going so far as to using a body double, are you again suggesting that all of her coworkers are in on it? Because she, or at least the supposed body double, has been claimed to be in group photographs. Even if it’s a photoshop, how come none of the other doctors and nurses are speaking up? Is every single person in her life being paid off and pretending she doesn’t exist? No mourning? No memorial service?

-3
TwoBearArms -3 points ago +3 / -6

Great thought exercise.

I don’t understand the “white lie” aspect. Is the white lie pretending that they’re not dead? Because I wouldn’t consider that a white lie at all.

Provided all else I accept, the check and the story of my daughter/sister/coworker died, my immediate reaction would be to share the sacrifice that they made. Publicly grieve and share memories of that person’s life. Not pretend like she didn’t exist

Concealing the death of a close friend or family member is not something that I would consider. And that’s just me, one person. There’s a whole network of friends, family, and coworkers she likely has that would also all have to accept this offer.

This is a woman who has two children who attend school. Those kids likely have friends who have met her. Teachers who have met her. Colleagues, parents, childhood friends, all of whom would have to be paid off to...pretend she never died? Or pretend she just doesn’t exist anymore?

What lie are they supposedly participating in here?

1
TwoBearArms 1 point ago +3 / -2

Are all her coworkers and family in on it then?

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

She had been interviewed since she fainted. If you’re looking for information specifically x amount of days afterwards I don’t have anything for you, unfortunately, but the interview link I provided for you was conducted after, or “since,” the incident where she fainted. I’m not sure if you have another idea of what “since” means but perhaps this is where the miscommunication was

I’m not attempting to gaslight or bait you. You asked for an interview to support my claim that it happened afterward and I provided one.

I’m of course open to the possibility that something is amiss, but there is not a lot to support that she is dead other than I haven’t seen her give a public appearance more recently. However, I can say the same about my cousin Rich but I am confident he is still alive without doing further research.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did you have any other assumptions? Was it an attempt to corner me or what?

1
TwoBearArms 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’d be worried that a person like that wouldn’t be able to get much done. Heck, we just had one hold the highest position in the land, and couldn’t even do enough to secure re election.

1
TwoBearArms 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay well you can’t want to opposite things. Do you want Mitch in or out?

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am sorry that you misunderstood me but if you’re just going to downvote and poop your pants instead of just talking this out then you’re clearly only looking for information you want to hear.

Look I get it, there is certainly confusion about the fact that this gal fainted after a vaccine and you don’t have the satisfactory answers that she’s okay. But instead of jumping to a conclusion, it’s best to just think things out a little bit. Use a bit of reasoning.

Now, I don’t have all the answers. You absolutely could be right and there’s something fishy going on. But to me, personally, the big picture makes that seem highly unlikely.

You asked me for my thoughts and I gave them. I don’t know why that makes you angry but I hope we can just be adults about this while we talk it out instead of just name calling.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

You quoted me as saying she had done interviews since the incident. This interview was taken after the incident.

I never specified “day after.” That was your own stipulation.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

https://youtu.be/tOH7XLHl2mo

This video was taken after the incident. I am not aware of how long afterwards.

Also I looked into her social media accounts. Her followed accounts (that aren’t celebrities) appear to be intact. Not sure where your nuking claim comes from.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

Couldn’t tell you. Maybe she’s at work. All I know is that she’s done video interviews since the incident took place, so beyond that I don’t need to know what she’s up to every single day.

I’m not so sure that her social circle has all been nuked though. Seems far fetched. Ill look into that.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never said nobody could fake an employee’s identity.

What I meant was that a person, supposedly a “crisis actor,” who died at the Boston bombings had a history. Have documentation of not only places they’ve worked, but documented coworkers, friends, and family, all of whom still exist. If that person was not actually killed in the Boston bombings, are we to expect that their network of friends and family are all in on it? Are they still leading lives where they have to continue lying about a person who doesn’t exist?

A person’s identity can be faked, sure. It’s when you continue to use critical thinking around their social circle and history that the theory begins to fall apart quickly.

-2
TwoBearArms -2 points ago +1 / -3

I’m not an omniscient being. I also don’t see what she has to do with the boston marathon bombing. Instead of just asking random questions, can you explain a bit more your thought process?

-2
TwoBearArms -2 points ago +1 / -3

Nope. But the family and friends of theirs are clearly real people, considering they have jobs and names and histories, and currently still exist.

-2
TwoBearArms -2 points ago +1 / -3

Forging documents? Group photos? That requires real identities and names associated with them, you understand this? Their bosses, coworkers, neighbors...all would have to be fabricated?

1
TwoBearArms 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a point to this?

-1
TwoBearArms -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't, no. But many of the victims are documented having worked at jobs and having past lives. There are family and friends of theirs who grieved when they died. Your suggestion is that all of that is faked, and i don't see how that's possible.

-3
TwoBearArms -3 points ago +1 / -4

Okay so the victims who have photos of them among family and friends...those who had documented histories at their places of work...those were all forged?

-2
TwoBearArms -2 points ago +2 / -4

How do you figure nobody died when they had families?

1
TwoBearArms 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted. Mitch is trash.

0
TwoBearArms 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t know. Inward sneezing appears to be something you made up. I don’t think I’ve ever sneezed while my mask was on, to my knowledge.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›