Why can’t we just discuss it in the comments? I can provide links just as easily here.

So you haven’t done any digging into the current Richard family? Why not?

Because I’m interested in having this conversation with you, specifically. If I just post it, you may not comment on it, and then the discussion goes nowhere.

I’m interested in hearing your thoughts, and at the very least we can dig into it together.

So who are these people today, who still continue to play these parts? They're still claiming to be the Richard family, what is their real identity?

When did I deny it was her? I merely couldn’t verify based on your picture alone, because you wouldn’t provide the source. But according to what you said the picture had labeled Denise Richard in the photograph, and your original argument was built on this.

Thus, if we go by your reality and the evidence you submitted, then Denise Richard was at the marathon. Otherwise, we can go over the picture again to see who exactly is in the photograph.

So this “Jane Richard” woman is continuing a fake identity in public? As well as her father and mother and brother?

What about their coworkers? Other family members? Are they buying into the lie or perpetuating it?

You showed me a picture that has Denise in it at the marathon. I’m going by your sources.

No, I actually have a lot to say. I’m just focusing on a single aspect that doesn’t make sense so as to not overwhelm you with questions, also, you were the one who started with the Richard family, so I’m continuing to keep focus.

If the event was planned, how come this family is continuing to play the part of the Richard’s? Do they have a life outside of the charade? If so, have they ever been spotted?

Their peers, city leaders, all interact with them regularly but how are they still thinking that this is the Richard family if they aren’t? In the last article I sent you, there’s a picture that includes Jane, Denise, and the father, all the same people from the pictures you sent.

How can this family be explained if the scenario never happened? There needs to be some reason for that otherwise your story doesn’t make sense. It literally relies on this.

Are you not understanding my question? You seem to be ignoring it.

Wild how people reach across a broad spectrum of actions and ideals innit?

It's not great evidence though. You can't even hear it.

So they’re a fake family who have been living years together as the Richards? Do they not have lives outside of it?

Because that slcertsinly appears to be the same man in 2019 as the photos you shared earlier. Jane appears to be the same as well (of course she’s grown, but there are many pictures of her through the years that show this transition into the teen she is now)

I’m confused. Are the captions supposed to be what the three people are saying? Because if so it’s incredibly difficult to hear, and there are a lot of times when someone is talking and there’s no caption for it.

It doesn’t seem like that these are the transcribed words.

Yes, you shared this already. But I still don’t understand how this family is still making appearances as the Martin family years after the incident. How are they continuing to lead these lives if what you are saying is true? How have they not been called out? They’ve been pictured in 2019 as the Martin family, including Denise, who you claim never existed.

If the reality is that the event was planned and that the Richard family didn’t exist, or were all paid actors, then there are several things that don’t add up.

Who is Jane Richard? How come this supposed “actress” is still making public appearances as Jane Richard years after the event?

https://www.dotnews.com/2019/rolling-out-carpet-martin-s-park

If she is an actress, who is this woman in her real life? Does she have another identity? How come she has not been identified as anybody other than Jane Richard?

Well I have a lot of comments but to make it easy I’ll stick with one thing for now:

let’s take this actress who’s supposedly playing a character, Jane Richard. Does she not have a life of her own? She’s made public appearances dozens of times, as recently as last year when a park was named for the Martin family. If she’s playing a part, how come nobody has identified her as a different person outside of her portrayal as Jane Martin? Because if she’s playing this role as a very prominent figure, who has thrown the first pitch at games and has been featured on several newspapers, it’s pretty difficult to have a life outside of that.

But wait, this still doesn’t explain the firefighter, or the coworkers/colleagues of the Martin family that all are vouching that Denise Richard, for example, did exist. While Martin didn’t die, Denise appeared to have.

If this attack never happened, then how did Jane Richard lose her leg?

I’m not familiar with him. Why is he significant?

Based on the tidbits I read, seems like he is/was an officer specializing in crisis events, who was in Boston during the marathon.

None of these links reference the firefighter we were talking about.

What are we moving towards here? If you had a point to whether or not BFD stands for Boston Fire Dept let me know. Otherwise this just looks like you’re dodging the topic at hand.

You still there? Are we continuing?

Hillary’s, actually. Monica also has her infamous blue dress but it’s not this one. Hers is darker and less revealing.

EDIT: the fact that I’m getting downvoted for this is wildly silly. I’m not trying to pick a fight here. I’m merely sharing facts.

The bill Clinton painting you have referenced here is not his official portrait. It’s a satire painting where bill clinton is wearing Hillary Clinton’s dress. The artist had done a number of paintings of presidents satirizing them.

You dope.

Oh I’m happy to go down this pathway! I’m just making sure there’s a point, but as long as we get there I’m golden.

BFD, i’d Assume, is Boston fire department.

To this question, no idea. There doesn’t appear to be significant splatter on his left pant leg in either picture, which is the only pant leg I can really see on the left picture.

To your other question, it appears to be Bill Richard, if the other pictures you shared are correct. But again, it’s tough to verify anonymous sources.

Do you have a point to all of this?

Based on this picture and the other one you sent that labels the daughter, they’re wearing the same clothes. So my guess is it is? But I don’t know for sure. Like I said, your pictures are just unsourced jpgs. I don’t know if you’re trying to pull a gotcha but I’ve given you my best guess on the pictures.