2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

MSNBC host Joy Reid is asking questions. A broken clock is right twice a day. https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/comments/1e6dzpa/msnbc_host_joy_reid_is_starting_a_conspiracy/

Why no details from his doctor? I know, because they are STILL WORKING ON THE FINAL STORY.

They want to see which way the wind is blowing before releasing details. They are figuring out what things they can say which will "add up" with evidence and what doesn't.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Decentralization is not atomization. It is self determination with properly sized groups of people where their views can be better expressed in legislation as needed.

It could be at the level of a state, or if the state is too tyrannical at the level of a county. It can be done peacefully as many states have already shown can be done over recent decades. They are able to defy federal orders without bloodshed.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you define "more classical liberalism" to mean less centralized power then most certainly yes. I'm talking about pragmatic solutions to tyranny that work, while Trump believers have fallen into hero worship of a controlled opposition candidate that appears to only be there to pacify rebellion. He's on board with the NWO agendas at the end of the day. His wall wasn't built and the swamp wasn't drained.

Bullet to the ear (if we even believe that) or not.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's relevant to Rev 3:16 on being lukewarm.

To try to make that apply to voting makes no sense to me. We aren't suppose to be lukewarm regarding the gospel, but we surely don't have to be passionate about supporting a wicked man running for office.

have to decide which one is the lesser evil.

That is not a biblical requirement. It is a common argument that many worldly people make. In fact it is one you can find from many lukewarm or psuedo Christians across the country. So it is not in opposition to being a lukewarm Christian.

because apparently tptb don't want him in the office

I don't believe their theater anymore. You're talking about the conspirators who gave us 9/11, JFK/RFK shot, (shows you they know how to make sure someone dies), Anthrax, OKC, Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing and you want to just take this at face value? They also gave us Alex Jones (controlled op) who pushed on us the controlled opposition President Trump.

Right off the bat it looks not only like a plot, but such a sloppy plot to indicate to me they want us to see it as an attempt on Trump and make that Zionist shill a hero. I would refer you to the "signs and lying wonders" from Revelation.

0
TurnToGodNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure, trump is a jew puppet but [I LIKE this Jew puppet]

I'd rather have a clear set of standards (you can call it black and white) than some "grey" kind of thinking that is unclear.

If your standard for a leader is not being part of the beast system then stick by it. And if you want to look at solutions to tyranny look for actual solutions. For me voting for a Jew puppet is not one such options.

One president gave us covid lockdowns and a clot shot, the other president did the same thing but moved the ball down the field further. If you find that to be a meaningful distinction then I don't understand your way of thinking. It's not meaningful enough for me to waste energy voting or hoping for one president or another.

Everything worthwhile in politics is local. The federal government is completely corrupt and is their strong hold.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

The alternative would be decentralization. A movement focused on shoring up power locally, making use of state nullification or county nullification (even jury nullification) to resist federal tyranny.

But hoping the Jew worshiping federal tyrant loves me a bit more than the other is a waste of time.

0
TurnToGodNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

"don't believe everything you hear"

This movie came out the same week as the alleged assassination attempt.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt30487077

4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://twitter.com/Brick_Suit/status/1813577250476028078

"Wasn't ready" to release his footage until 3 days later. That's a little suspect. I wonder what they were editing out? Perhaps he had to get the Secret Service OK first so they could remove any fakery?

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the photographer gets a better propaganda photo.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the guy shilling for Operation Warp Speed Trump (yourself) isn't the shill?

Hmmm, might want to think about that one agent Smith.

I'm not a supporter but I'd rather have him

So you're a dishonest supporter at that. You're supporting both him and this false narrative created for him. Even calling people "shill" for daring to question the father of the clot shots.

0
TurnToGodNow 0 points ago +1 / -1

You seem to not understand what I'm saying. I'm talking about the PR photograph shot here in the title. She is getting out of the way of the shot so Trump gets his photo.

Yeah you're buying the narrative that brain dead Trump worshipers buy into (this false sign and lying wonder). I'm buying into neither narrative, just the fact that Trump is a deep state puppet being promoted by this incident.

Leftists think Trump himself staged it. Of course not. He's just a Jew puppet.

4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even though that would literally be her job to block "shots", if this were legit.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

That tree would have been there when they did their initial assessment of the location and accounted for.

In the videos taken by Trump supporters from the ground, the shooter appears further to the "right", not "left" on the roof, which would make his location more visible to snipers, not less. Clearly visible in fact.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not really what he said. You guys jumped the gun on this one.

3
TurnToGodNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're truly impervious to reason. By saying it was rumored, he's acknowledge the strength of that claim already. You're adding nothing.

3
TurnToGodNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

You just described fighting for the United Nations you goon.

2
TurnToGodNow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who cares who claims it? He said "rumored" as in it is a rumor.

4
TurnToGodNow 4 points ago +6 / -2

Plausible.

I still believe it was a stage performance with a few "little people" killed to enhance the effect.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

More of the lame stream DEI narrative. Yeah right.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seconds later, a Secret Service sniper returned fire and killed Crooks.

You can't return fire seconds later if you weren't looking at him to begin with.

1
TurnToGodNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anonymous law enforcement sources soon to be anonymous corpses.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›