I don't think it will be that long until they have their directly controllable transhuman army. They are pushing vaccines are warp speed and pushing 5G. They've already tested this tech in at least some of the batches they gave out during covid and monitored the effects. Likely they also tested emotional manipulation of subjects and the kill switch (see the weird spinning seizure / hallucination footage).
They want it all ready by 2030 it seems. When it is all said and done they will have literal religious converts, beaming a voice of god right into everyone's skulls who took this crap. Even the staunchest atheist won't resist.
In their vision they want us all dead, and according to scripture there will be many martyrs. But there will always be a remnant until the very end. Stay strong and carry on.
Bottom text.
"The background to the decision is signals of an increased risk of heart muscle inflammation (myocarditis) and pericarditis (pericarditis). Data from Australia point to an increased incidence, especially in younger people, in connection with vaccination with Nuvaxovid. The recommendation is made for precautionary reasons and applies until there is more information from the ongoing studies. The vaccine can continue to be given as a primary vaccination or booster dose to individuals aged 31 and older.
Novavax was lauded as being a more traditional style of vaccine since it would just use a measured dose of the spike protein arranged in a novel nano-structure. Supposedly no mRNA or any other genetic shenanigans going on (though the proteins are produced using genetic shenanigans prior to injection). And yet it is still damaging people's hearts. Gee maybe this spike protein is itself toxic and shouldn't be injected into anyone.
It is a sad fact that it takes some Kardashian banging celebrity to finally reach people with this information. But a win is a win.
Even normies are talking about it and being like "hey he does have a point".
ORIGINAL CREDIT: u/purplepally1 from the other website.
Neonatal deaths in Scotland are up ~150%.
Authorities have said the increase is not due to COVID.
Authorities have also said that it is not from COVID vaccines. This is despite the fact they did not ask any mothers their vaccination status.
Why did they not ask? Well here's your answer:
"Asking mothers their vaccination status will undermine faith in the vaccination system, as there will be a perception that their choice to receive a vaccine could have caused a negative repercussion. In addition there is no reason to ask mothers for their vaccination status as there is no public health reason to do so".
This is again, despite a 150% increase in Neonatal deaths, which has left everyone 'mystified' once again.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj4rE0LrpR0
His face at 7:23 says it all.
Remember folks - SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. Especially if you are pregnant. Remember the vaccine can't ever harm your child if the authorities refuse to ask you what your vaccine status was. It is just that simple.
A little over a year ago today, Moderna's CEO predicted his gene therapy shots would become like regular flu shots
Those who do not get vaccinated will immunize themselves naturally, because the Delta variant is so contagious. In this way we will end up in a situation similar to that of the flu. You can either get vaccinated and have a good winter. Or you don't do it and risk getting sick and possibly even ending up in hospital.
I had a normie shower me with MSM links, telling me how covid vaccines are certainly NOT gene therapy. I then did a 5 minute google search into the literature on mRNA and gene therapy. The first paper I found shows mRNA is being thought of as gene therapy
"mRNA as gene therapeutic: How to control protein expression" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365910008308
And here is another paper in the pre-covid literature even mentioning vaccines as mRNA gene therapy
"Modified mRNA as an alternative to plasmid DNA (pDNA) for transcript replacement and vaccination therapy" https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1517/14712598.2015.1057563
Current gene therapy involves replacement of defective gene by delivery of healthy genetic material to precede normal function...The use of mRNA-based gene transfer could indeed be a promising new strategy for gene therapy. Notable advantages include no risk of integration into the genomic DNA [therefore one doesn't have to edit the genome for it to be gene therapy]
and let's read on
[one method of transfection] is generation of mRNA endocytosis by cationic carriers [lipid nanoparticles as used in cv-19 vaxxines]. These methods can also be used for in vivo as well as in vitro applications...As the mRNA does not have to enter the nucleus, soft electrical pulses may be applied to reduce cellular toxicity.
And here is the FDA definition from 2018 (pre-covid) https://archive.is/om8Mn
Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use [https://www.fda.gov/media/113768/download]
The "replication deficient" Adenovirus based shots (J&J, AZ and Sputnik) were talked about for much longer in the literature than mRNA in regards to gene therapy.
This is from a public paper in Science on gene therapy. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aan4672
The development of gene delivery vectors such as replication-defective retro viruses and adeno-associated virus (AAV)...led to the initiation of clinical trials in the early 1990s.
And of course Bayer CEO's famous admission. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/bayer-head-admits-covid-19-vaccine-is-gene-therapy/
Ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell or gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago in the public, 'Would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?' we would've probably had a 95 percent refusal rate. I think this pandemic has also opened many people's eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.
In conclusion the media gaslit you and tried to memory hole the definition of the term "gene therapy" used in the literature pre-2020.
