12

It turns out not only was it a badly written paper but they failed to provide controls for the most important portion of the study.

I didn't pick up on this at first since the first two sections mentioned controls which made me think everything was on the up and up. This is wrong.

To not have controls for the incubation period where they found the majority of their findings is beyond negligence. So something is up with these guys.

Still it doesn't mean that there isn't nanotech either. Just that these researchers seem to have made their study intentionally bad. Perhaps in order to be ridiculed later and debunked (psyop)? Now the shills are out there "debunking" it, I think all as planned.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

10

That's what they tell us. Light can travel through a vacuum with nothing in it. And maybe so but what is the evidence?

So I looked up the best vacuum on planet Earth. It contains 2.5 million molecules of air per cubic cm. This is said to replicate conditions between stars. So how then can we say we've ever tested light waves going through "nothing". We haven't.

To test the validity of my suspicions I've asked the science guys on reddit if they have an answer for this. The first few responses have already been hostile and that usually indicates this is one of those issues they simply don't have a good answer for. I was very polite in my question btw, so no I didn't provoke anybody, this is all on them.

We'll see how it goes. I'm open to a good explanation of why this is a valid test, but this light has 2 million molecules to interact with ever cubic cm it propagates, so you didn't rule out matter.

Einstein told us that the speed of light must always, not only appear, but BE the same in every frame of reference no matter how fast we are moving towards or away from it. So even if you are moving at half the speed of light towards a light beam, the entire universe must conspire to either "speed up" or slow down your "time" to account for this difference.

If that makes sense to you, you are no longer sane. You cannot create scenarios of two mutually exclusive events at the same time and call that reality. This is fundamental to reason.

To show this contradiction, consider you are running away from a light beam and towards another at the same time. You move at half the speed of light. Of course in real life you will encounter the light you are moving towards first, but in Einstein's universe both beams MUST (in your world) hit you at the same time. However, in Einstein's universe, someone else will see them hit you at different times because they also MUST see light travel at a certain speed. This is just plain fucking stupid.

At best you can have an illusory effect, but to confuse that with a real difference in simultaneity is to truly give up on reason itself.

11

"Self Assembling Nanotech found in Covid-19 vaccines Japan Study"

My first thought is "wow edit this thing down, and stay focused". It really does too much. The authors repeat themselves often and the paper goes off on tangents not directly related to the nano-tech findings (which is all we care about).

Also the discussion was lacking. I was hoping for detailed analysis ruling out other micro-organisms or non-living microstructures which it did not.

I also hoped for some analysis showing specific nanotech that this looks like but besides from one spiral structure (which they claim looked like a theoretical magnetic nanobot) they didn't do that. Even for the spiral structure they didn't quote the paper, which would be helpful in proving a point. Or maybe they could have shown an image from that paper for comparison.

Still it looks like some findings are there, and were discussed. Assuming they are real it is concerning.

But it is pretty much no better information than reading just the abstract. They found some self-assembling nano/micro structures of unknown origin which appear to damage living cells (human blood and sperm cells) and stuck around for a long time.

Here are the few points I thought were interesting.

  1. The Pfizer sample responded to wireless. They say it showed immediate increased proliferation and growth of rectangular structures.
  2. They tried to incorporate some possible treatments in their testing, and there is some discussion on that. But nothing very convincing.

I give it a 5/10.

https://doi.org/10.56098/586k0043

19

Notice how much of the strongest opposition to Jewish rule is often Catholic (going back to Reverend Coughlin and now E Michael Jones/ Nick Fuentes). Long before Jews were prominently in power, the Catholic church was recognized as the seat of anti-Christ and matches up well with the Book of Revelation.

The Vatican is also on board with the NWO agenda, just as much as the Jews are. So if/when the public does wake up to Jewish rule, the occultists will already have another faux Christian power structure ready to take over and lead you to hell.

This is why the only way forward is to actually get right with God and follow the true Messiah Jesus Christ. Following Freemasons, Popes or Jews (or your own ego -- ahem Atheists) instead will lead you to hell.

11
10

There seems to be a psyop to make pickleball popular in America. I know, I know, just hear me out.

Had anyone heard of pickleball before Jamie Foxx stroked out from the clot shot? I hadn't either. But now I keep hearing about it everywhere.

Is big pickleball behind this? \s

10

Praise the Lord too. Imagine a world with less sodomites and effeminates.

Am I too mean? After we saw them go after children very publicly the last several years they get no sympathy from me.

They are still defending their perverse "shows" for kids to this day.

11
13
13
10
21
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›