That data would imply that the vaccine is at least slightly effective. The vast majority of people who die are over 70. The vaccine rate among them in Canada is like 98%. So if 0nly 90% of the deaths are vaccinated, they could claim something like you are 10x less likely to die from covid if you are vaccinated. Of course we know they use a bunch of screwy things to make sure that people who are vaccinated are not dying of covid and it probably has 0 effectiveness, but the data being shown here would suggest some effectiveness.
I'm not at all trying to argue for the side of vaccines. I have not and don't ever plan on getting the shot. I only want our arguments to be as strong as possible. My grandfather died from "cancer" right after getting his booster so I believe they are dangerous. My guess is the real devastation of the vaccines comes from "non-covid" deaths which appear to be up significantly.
According to their vaccination rates, most of their population is vaccinated (90%ish), so it would make sense that most of the people dying would be vaccinated. If you have the same death ratio as % vaccinated, it probably means that the vaccine just isn't very effective, which is a surprise to no one. It probably doesn't mean that it is killing everyone getting the vaccine.
You are basically giving the terrain theory argument