It's attacking the user not the argument.
Rule 1 is a good rule, I was being patient, done now.
Learning curve over now.
There is so much of the name calling and rule 1 violations and we are at a learning curve but yes, Rule 1 needs to be enforced, unfortunately babysitting grown men isn't all I have going on..
You can wonder if someone has been wounded in their brain. But yeah, I'll have to be removing these too.
I've asked a user to stop with the stormfag stuff
This has been edited to detract what was directed at the user being replied to. And it's borderline.
You're right I need to be better. Thanks for your help.
Well we're done attacking the users now, so.. This one has to go too
You said Mr and referenced his username, "those games don't work on me"
same thing, rule 1.
We have no evidence this user is a pedo and it's breaking rule 1.
Removed for rule 1. Can edit for approval. We really do need to keep rule 1.
Ok, fair enough. Deleting that and this to keep with rule 1.
You're calling the user a pedo not offending his argument, hence rule 1
Rule 1 Rephrase requested
I think you're both capable of being reasonable. I'm fortunate to have a decent rapport with you both and most here and I know the difference.
I get what you're saying but I don't want to get rid of memes and over doing memes with no explanation seems slippery to me, this isn't c/Funny, tho we enjoy laughing here and there. Usually text posts explain themselves but with video and images it is often needed.
I'm a fan of gold stars! ⭐
Explain the conspiracy otherwise it's low effort and will be removed.
I didn't say you aren't reasonable and I apologize my words were understood that way, I've always known you are reasonable, which is why we stay talking so well.
"You're killin me, Smalls"
Are submission statements or explanations really that big of an ask?
It was an error. Thanks