This theory accepts some data and denies other. It arises to explain why everything looks so messy (proposed answer: the All is unaware; corollary: our increased self-awareness is our becoming the All). However, as Q followers are learning, calls for trust while everything is messy should not be discounted, as a master planner gives sufficient evidence he is fully aware. Thus better answers for that messy look have been submitted.
If we are threads of a consciousness, we ought not think the consciousness is less aware than we are. Rather, the consciousness preserves its and our identity rather than mixes or dissolves either.
Simple. El and Shekhina are the same being, so their appearance is a both/and. What we (ought to) call El was not physically incarnate until it appeared as Jesus. Shekhina works through other layers of reality. However, both Shekhina and the early appearances of El used another ("spiritual") layer of reality to temporarily manifest physically. El and Shekhina are one with the Creator that the Ten Words tell us to worship alone. All other beings were created but, important, the Creator uses the same rules he gave other beings when he himself interacts with them: thus physical beings have limited physical freedoms, and spiritual beings have limited ability either to manifest physically temporarily or to incarnate and become physical beings. Thus Enki and Demiurge are counterfeits of what El and Shekhina were doing. (Demiurge? Half-worker? Give me a break!)
What is the root of evil? The consequence in physical reality of the existence of good? A corruption from an “evil” entity (I.e. satan/saturn).
Both those answers are spot-on. Going back to the root, how did Satan become evil? Briefly, he had to break his own good will without having the will to do so. More at c/Christianity.
Edited from my reply here, where the OP was subsequently deleted. Thanks u/Mark4-39 for sharing. Thanks for the romp of mostly interesting points.
As most of you know, most of "official" history is a lie.
Promising start! I like to winnow out truth from mixtures. Truths are not batted away by comparing them to lies. Just the reverse!
Sumerians, who primarily worshipped a deity called El. This was actually Enki
"El" is not name but title, common to all proto-Semitic languages. Yahweh's oral tradition long predated Enki or else we wouldn't know about the flood at all.
El is who we now refer to as "God"
"God" is also title. We and he know who the real Creator is whatever we call him. Words do not have the magick of referring to things we do not intend by them.
Phoenicians (based in Carthage) began worshipping his brother, Baal (Enlil)
You're starting to blur whether you mean the people (kings) or the spirits (idols). One is history, one is spiritual warfare, they often overlap, but let's keep them straight.
These Babylonian Baalists were what we now refer to as Hebrews (originally called Hyksos).
I'm not gonna argue much geography or chronology, but the order and collation are starting to go off kilter here. Hyksos in Babylon before they were kicked out of Egypt? I don't think so. Of course Hebrews preceded Abram, but their prehistory doesn't sound like this to me.
In the original story, Abraham actually sacrifices his son. It was altered after the fall of Babylon, and the rise of Judaism
Wouldn't this be nicer with facts and references to the "original story"? I'm writing a Bible study on c/Christianity that will show why the account we have can be trusted, but good archaeologists more typically run with what they have proven, not disproven.
Mt. Sinai (Great Pyramid)
"Mount Sinai in Arabia", says Paul. No comment on female polarities.
Following the 10 Commandments energizes her, resulting in the spread of peace and harmony (high quantum frequencies). See why the Cabal has scrubbed this from history?
You won't get it back to the people by mixing it with error.
Sorry, the Hebrews were the aggressors.
Lay out both combatants' statements side by side and decide who is more trustworthy.
the names Adam and Eve were retroactively added, based on names of Pharaohs.
When I look at archaeology I see evidence going the other way round. Both are theories and we must choose preponderance rightly.
Sphinx Stele tablet
Salsa?
I really can't think of any other explanation besides alien intervention.
Yahweh is more alien to us than any alien. All spiritual forces are strangers. To call them "space aliens" to catch up to our alleged technology does not disguise their nature as created sentient beings. Don't run with the wrong ones!
This was also when Ezra's Torah was written
Ezra was centuries after Solomon, and that's based on archaeology. Don't JEDP me without good data.
they masqueraded as devout Jews, and founded the Pharisees
Pharisees were no Baalists; they called on a thousand demons in the Talmud but had strict rules against calling them baalim. Oh you mention this:
used the threat of the growing Roman Empire to subvert their people through Talmudic teachings
Funny how after rejecting so much oral tradition you now put the Talmud squarely in BC when it was basically all still oral only (Mishnah). We could use more admission of oral tradition, not only when it suits your point.
Jesus allegedly never proclaimed himself to be the son of God, and may have not been crucified (this is believed among Jews and Muslims)
Your crux of course. Matt. 27:43 (hostile witnesses): "He said, 'I am the Son of God.'" Muslims believe he was crucified but not killed. Some Jews believe he was hanged. Point was, he came back.
The "son sacrifice and resurrection" myth dates all the way back to Ancient Egypt
And where did their spirits learn it from? Older "seed of woman" mythoi?
his initials match Julius Ceasar's
Who's "Ceasar"? By this logic, Christ Jesus = Chairman Jao.
"Holy Communion"? Based on a cannibalistic ritual
Where'd the cannibals get identification from? They do it because identification is real despite the pagan versions of it.
ritual sodomy (ffs...)
Salsa? I don't have much on Vaticans and Khazars so am not disputing that much.
unholy union known as the Bilderbergs. Around the same time, the United Kingdom was established
Bilderberg meeting established 1954. United Kingdom union 1801. Similar to my feel for your other flow.
ALL of these are Satanic
The appendix is on surer footing. So who created Satan? Worship the Creator as he reveals himself. Your story has so few good guys.
But wait, there's MORE! They wanted to use a system of fractional reserve banking
The Fed was the 4th national US bank to do this, not counting the colonial banks. Nothing new under the sun. You relegated Andrew Jackson defeating one of them (and being honored with 20 FRNs) to a footnote.
They own(ed?) our entire economy, and by extension, our lives.
Don't speak for me fren. I'm sold.
Humanity was created by a race known as the Pleiadians. We share their DNA, and they look very similar to us (imagine Aryans with even lighter skin).
If you're fighting Satan, how can you join his other army? His house is divided and will fall. Get a real Messiah.
Contrary to popular belief, Enki/El/God actually had/has a spouse named Asheara.
I read God and Sex cover to cover, but those porn reels come from pagan Israelites, because the righteous left no artifacts.
Identity theft originated from the Khazars ("Eaters of Blood").
Don't blood-libel any people. Use evidence. If you pursue truth, keep doing so.
biproduct
reimurgence
Saducess (Hellinized
Synogogues, leading to much of the Rabbonic
Colloseum
Praetoeian
Knight's Templar
omage
Sadam
I hope I can educate some of you
"Occult" means hidden. What is hidden is easier to use for evil than what is revealed, thus the association. When all that is hidden becomes revealed, so will good and evil. Best decide now rather than later.
The mental is more real than the physical, but the physical is also real and All. If you start with the principle as quoted you omit other principles necessary for balancing the All. This omission is designed to simplify the question of evil, but it fails. Instead, confront the question and answer robustly without denying reality.