The Supreme Court didn’t reject the measles case because it was a “faked image.” In this context, “composite nature of the evidence” refers to the challenger publishing six papers about the measles virus but he did not meet all of Lanka’s requirements in a single paper. That is why it is a “composite nature.”
For example, Lanka didn’t just want someone to prove the existence of measles, he also wanted the person to determine the size of it. The person challenging Lanka did all of those things but not in a single paper. It was spread throughout six papers.
Exactly. And if you disagree with him, that means you’re a shill and you have 30 alts made solely to post in /r/conspiracy and you’re literally PAID to disagree with him because why on earth would you disagree with him unless someone was giving you $ to do so.
It’s not a conspiracy. It’s just a low effort attempt to bash a press secretary of the political party he doesn’t like.
It’s interesting how this is supposed to be a conspiracies forum and it’s literally just a pro-Trump forum.
Because the impetus for you looking up my post history wasn't because I broke the rules. It was because I disagreed with you.
And I like how you conveniently left off the second part I wrote: You literally broke your own rules and then banned others for breaking them.
Your job as moderator is to look up the history of people who disagree with you so you can use your moderator powers to ban them instead of engaging in discourse with them?
You literally broke your own rules and then banned others for breaking them.
Did you read the article or just link it? The article describes Pentagon officials making it difficult for Biden’s transition team. Transition team. As in before he was inaugurated today as President. The Pentagon reports to the President. It now reports to Biden.
Biden is literally in the White House running the country and Trump supporters are like “he’s trolling them” lmfao