There's become a dillema I've noticed in the modern day. We hate that everyone lies, but knowing how corrupt and sinister the powers are, it's hard to trust those who tell the truth as well.

I mean you can for a while, but at a certain point you have to ask yourself how James O'Keefe isn't dead yet?

If people who run too afoul end up dead or political prisoners, just ask the gravestones of anyone even close to whitewater, then how can you trust those who are really doing a ton of exposing on regime corruption such as James O'Keefe while remaining free and alive.

It's a weird paradox. You can't trust those who lie because they lie, and the ones who are alive and are angering the establishment yet continue to live and enjoy freedom, you're wondering how they aren't persecuted.

You might argue that we haven't entered full Soviet mode and that's why, and yet Alex Jones got sued for a billion dollars, Trump has had more lawfare launched at him than mafia bosses who actually have committed crimes, and people like Epstein end up "committing suicide".

So our current establishment is not afraid of blatantly and nakedly persecuting those who challenge their corruption, and yet some people are able to do it. How and why?

I don't believe James O'Keefe is controlled opposition. However, have any of you seen that Black Mirror episode where that guy who's enraged at the weird pod society they live in where they all ride an excercise bike all day to earn points to spend on stupid boring things, and he rants and raves at the panel when he finally gets on stage....and then what do they do, they give him a show where he does just that, so that the populace can allow his rantings to vicariously satiate any discontent they may have....and he becomes part of the system.

I don't know it's just an odd thing that you can't trust your enemies and you can't trust your allies, which seems to be a unique modern dillema. This is just one of the reasons I advocate that people need to be in the Bible, because it's always been true that it's the one thing you can know and count as true and you can bet everything you have that it's true and in this world of constant delusions and tumultuous waters, that is an anchor and the rock. You know that Jesus is not controlled opposition and that the word of God is alive and can be trusted.

When Sandy Hook happened, I didn't assume anything. I didn't watch the news, I saw it on the TV in the break room at my job, and that was that. I didn't even know about Alex Jones' claims. I didn't find out about those until years later I think listening to Nick Dipaolo's podcast or something like that where the topic was brought up.

At the time I just dismissed that as Alex Jones being Alex Jones. To me it was in line with everything I thought about Alex Jones.

And the topic that I was hearing on the podcast was about Alex Jones admitting that Sandy Hook really happened. So again, I just went on, not knowing anything except what I'm telling you.

Then about 2 years ago, someone on this site linked to that Robbie video where he's laughing and getting himself into the "sad mode" to talk about Sandy Hook.

That was really weird. Then I saw parents with Anderson Cooper smiling and beaming talking about wanting to remember the good times and it was bizarre. I've seen true crime stuff where someone died 10 years ago and you can still see the pain the in the peoples eyes as they talk about it.

And yet these parents who lost a child like 3 days ago are smiling like they won the lottery.

As a rebuttal, I've heard it said that "people grieve differently" but I have never, ever seen anyone grieve like that. And what I'd actually say is that people cope differently; but the death of a loved one, you can always see the pain. Even when it's Chris Farley's brothers or friends talking about Chris 25 years later. They can joke about the funny moments, but you can see the sadness of loss in their eyes. When you look at these Sandy Hook parents, I see zero pain in their eyes including the recent ads they've been doing on YouTube asking to support banning guns. They're either complete sociopaths who feel nothing, or they did not lose their child. Those are the two conclusions I have to draw that could make sense of it. If only Robbie acted weird, I could chock it up to maybe he has autism and doesn't know how to act like a normal person in any given social situation or maybe he is a sociopath. But for all the parents to act without grief, to say that that is statistically improbable is an understatement.

And then I find out most of them have these acting backgrounds.

And then I find out that Google has purged like 90% of evidence people had about Sandy Hook.

And then Alex Jones gets sued for like a billion dollars.

But the thing is, when I type Sandy Hook hoax into a site like Rumble, the only videos I get are from people who act and talk about it like flat earthers do and all the evidence is trying to show that some college kid or high schooler, whatever the age now, looks like one of the sandy hooks kids. I'm not interested in that. People can look similar and that just makes it look like conspiracy theory.

To me the most compelling things are how much they show no signs of sadness, they're all on board using it to push for gun control and how they all seem fake.

I watched a video from people confronting the medicine board in Japan about people who died from the covid vax. And this was a year since some of these people died and the man was furiously angry and the women were uncontrollable and crying talking about their loved ones. The Japanese are more stoic people and that's how they talk a year on.

It all feels fake and yet, I can't find evidence for or against Sandy Hook other than how the parents act and what they're choosing to use the alleged indecent as a precedent for.

All the articles saying it's real TALK about Sandy Hook and how it's a dangerous conspiracy theory to deny it, but they don't bring receipts; only rhetoric....and on the other side those arguing in favor of it being a hoax they just show the parents acting weird and the ones who dive deep use uncompelling evidence and present things like flat earth-ers do; so it's really kind of annoying. Everything my eyes and gut perceives says that it's a hoax based on how people behave and how they're all on board the same agenda for propelling gun control legislation. You'd think one of the parents would be like "I don't want my child's death politicized". And yet instead they're all on board letting their children be turned into symbols for the democratic party. Again statistically improbable for all the parents to react in this way.

But all of this is my gut and my gut doesn't convince people.

I would prefer a breakdown for the for vs against from someone who's knowledgeable. Thank you for the time if you choose to do that.