We already won the war. Soon you'll be going to hell.
Don't be a bitch 🤣
Again, stop projecting.
I'm not a jew.
EvErYOnE i DoN'T LiKe iS a PaKi 🤣
Again, I don't get on my knees. I'm not a jew.
Plees saar feex langueege modaal broke.
What's up with this jewish obsession with shit? You guys look like jeets. 🤣
The train to the gas chambers is that way.
Again, stop projecting.
Unlike you I'm not a nigger.
From Heaven made by God according to His likeness.
Whites don't come from africa. We're not apes like niggers and jews. Just ask u/JosephGoebbel5
Just like the holocoaster?
Obama beats her by being the first black trans president tRaNsPHoBe!
Where are your regular americans? Surely they're posting from a chicken coop in Mumbai or a tunnel in Tel Aviv.
People weren't very bright before the covid shots. Then they became retarded at warp speed. Funny thing is they claim to be Christians while idolizing a closet jew. 🤡🌎
He uses multiple browsers and lots of hemorrhoid cream kek
Disclaimer: calculations done with ChatGPT so take it with a grain of salt.
Estimating hit probability for a 0.5 in² target at 140 m with AR-15 iron sights
This is a brutally tiny target for that setup. Here’s an approximate calculation to show the order of magnitude rather than an exact figure.
Key geometry and conversion
- Target size (square): area (A = 0.5\ \text{in}^2), side (s = \sqrt{0.5} \approx 0.707\ \text{in}).
- Effective “hit radius” (half-side): (a = s/2 \approx 0.3535\ \text{in}).
- Distance: (140\ \text{m} \approx 153\ \text{yd}).
- MOA scaling: (1\ \text{MOA}) at (153\ \text{yd} \approx 1.603\ \text{in}).
Dispersion assumptions for “budget AR-15 + irons”
Even with a decent zero and good fundamentals, practical shooter-and-rifle dispersion with iron sights typically lands around (3\text{–}6\ \text{MOA}) at this distance.
- 3 MOA (optimistic): group diameter (\approx 4.81\ \text{in}), radius (R \approx 2.40\ \text{in}).
- 4 MOA (typical): diameter (\approx 6.41\ \text{in}), radius (R \approx 3.20\ \text{in}).
- 6 MOA (conservative): diameter (\approx 9.62\ \text{in}), radius (R \approx 4.81\ \text{in}).
Approximate hit probability (assuming uniform distribution):
[ p \approx \frac{A_{\text{target}}}{A_{\text{group}}} = \frac{0.5}{\pi R^2} ]
- 3 MOA: (p \approx 2.8%).
- 4 MOA: (p \approx 1.6%).
- 6 MOA: (p \approx 0.7%).
Effects of motion and wind
- Moving target: Adds lead estimation error, inflating dispersion by ~50%. Probabilities drop to ~1.2%, 0.7%, 0.3%.
- Light wind: At ~153 yd, drift can be 1–2 in if uncorrected, which is multiples of the target’s half-side. This further reduces practical hit chance.
Direct answer
With a budget AR-15 and iron sights at 140 m, hitting a 0.5 in² target on a moving object in light wind is extremely unlikely. Under optimistic conditions (3 MOA, perfect center, good lead), you’re in the low single-digit percent range; more typical conditions put you well under 1%, and motion/wind correction errors drive it closer to near-zero.
So no way a faggot on antidepressants and hormone therapy would be able to do it.
Why would God save a guy who's sure he's not going to heaven? That shot on the earlobe was a practical effect like they used to do in old movies.
All AIs do it even the chink ones. That's what happens to software when jeets take money from jews. Everything goes to shit.
eat shit jeet