You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Show me where it says that in the Talmud.

Jesus Christ, all that waiting for that? Come on, Mark. I thought you were going to hit me with something real. Did you really think that was insightful?

No one has any idea what you’re talking, least of all you. I’ve given you multiple opportunities to make your point, but you refuse. Occam’s Razor tells me it’s because you don’t have one.

This is dorm room-level insight.

Fear of what? Again, you don’t even know what you’re talking about. The Sabbateans didn’t have a particular relationship to the Talmud. They were more interested in the mystical elements of the Kabbalah, but there was no rejection of the former. If you’re trying to get me to discuss the anti-Talmudists, then you’d be talking about the Frankists.

Whether or not you agree with my posts, I approach my arguments with nothing but honesty. That is the essence of acting in good faith. You, on the other hand, with your deceptive and evasive (and failed) strategy to trap me on some rhetorical ledge are a prime example of the opposite.

You already admitted that the only reason you even asked was to test me. That’s the definition of “bad faith.” You don’t have a point beyond that.

You didn’t have a point. You bizarrely tried to “get me” on something that I very clearly answered, then moved the goalposts multiple times to make yourself feel better.

Because when someone asks you a very specific question, you’d think that they’d...you know, have a point to make. Anytime someone brings up Sabbateans or Frankists, I know that they’re an entry-level paranoid antisemite reciting things they just read on some trash site.

Oh, so you didn’t have a point and are retarded. Try harder next time.

Are you retarded? Either make your “point” or stop wasting my time.

Then why’d you ask? Is this you admitting that you have no idea what you’re talking about or would you like to keep avoiding taking any position whatsoever?

The thread had gone on too long and it wouldn’t let me reply to your comment. I’ll happily say here what I said there:

It’s doubtful that you’re asking the question in good faith. The Talmud isn’t some secret book filled with gentile hatred and child rape, so what a defunct sect of Jewish cultists thinks of it is pretty irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Now, do you have any insight whatsoever or are you just posting shit that you know nothing about? I’m guessing the latter.

Who?

Thanks, that answered my question.

Let me ask you a question first: what do you think you’re even talking about?

I think this is extremely optimistic.

Gee, you certainly conduct yourself like an intelligent person who knows what he's talking about.

Yes, you can search the Talmud indeed. It's what I always recommend to people like you. There's absolutely nothing in there that supports your assertion, as you must obviously know in the way that you're now being quite coy about the issue.

Aw, it's the idiot who's still upset that I know more about David Cole than he does.

Can you point me to where this is said in the Talmud and what it has to do with rabbis raping little white girls? Thanks in advance.

Report a website to whom?

Perhaps if you’re so defensive about the things you post as being fake, this should set off alarm bells in your racist little brain. If you get called out for being full of shit every time you post some fabricated or misinterpreted Talmudic passage, perhaps this is...you know, not evidence of you being right. Food for thought.

If you give me a fabricated verse, I will absolutely call you out on it. And if it isn't your first rodeo, then you probably already know that you're peddling horseshit.

Don't you people ever get tired of being so disingenuous?

Thank you.

No, it's not. It's the incoherent ramblings of a fascist who was successfully sued for libel for the bullshit that he wrote. You're talking about a person who thought that every child disappearance had the hidden hand of the Jews behind it.

But since you're such an expert, can you tell me which parts of the Talmud encourage ritualistic murder and the rape of young girls? I'd love to know.