I think he's saying that it's basically a limited hangout. Since Gary webb is someone conspiracy researchers support, and normal people don't care or are already desensitized to and 'old story'.
So Gary Webb will easily take the #1 spot, keeping whatever other stories are. Being talked about from hitting r/all.
I highly encourage everyone to (re)read through all the Columbine FBI files. I haven't done so in many years, but iirc:
There were at least 5 people involved, and if you compare interviews and redactions you can even get some of their names. One of them being a man in his thirties with blond hair, military cut, I think his first name was Mark.
All I know if that I jumped to the middle of the video, and he's talking about the mouth breathing. That baby's eyes have been digitally altered. Watch as they zoom in.
I have met a black eye child though, like 2010ish. He was getting kicked out of a grocery store, and couldn't make out any words other than water. I bought him some. I think it was just a kid on mojo/spice/k2. But his eyes were black, and I knew of the black eyed children at the time.
If you were actually smart, you'd realize that black vs white is divide and conquer.
That if you can create infighting amongst your slaves, and make them blame each other for their problems instead of the slave masters, that the slaves will never be able to unite against their captors.
What does it matter to anything? Corporis could be botting against himself for 'credibility' for all we know.
Up and down votes are a terrible system anyway. Even if the system isn't being manipulated artificially, it's still mob rule by a mass of idiots.
All these reddit spin-offs enable all the same features that allowed reddit to be gamed.
There isn't a good way to prevent shills and mob rule on an anonymous forum, so the best we can do is eliminate the features that make it worse.
Information needs to stand on it's own for everyone to evaluate, not filtered through populism.
At the very least, users should only be allowed to up/downvote while replying.
They much prefer to use silent weapons. They would rather fight quiet wars
You basically said it, might as well post a link
"Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" https://www.syti.net/GB/SilentWeaponsGB.html
Carbon emissions are a scam.
Co2 increases come after temperature increases in every core sample ever taken.
Pollution is a real problem, but isn't carbon isnt the problem.
Desertification isn't caused by climate change. It's mostly caused by poor land and animal management, and the man-made interferences to the water table and natural reservoirs.
This is a map of areas ag risk of human induced desertification: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/?cid=nrcs142p2_054004
If anyone actually wanted to solve any problems related to climate change, and make the biggest tangible impact, they start with planting trees and plants in these areas.
If you look around you can find more and better examples, but you can get the idea here: https://www.thesurvivalgardener.com/establishing-high-desert-food-forest/
Even the saharan desert is often theorized to be created, or at least contributed to by humans. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4315796/How-humans-created-Sahara-desert-8-000-years-ago.html
Again, there's better sources out there if you're interested.
Geoff Lawton is another guy worth looking up that has restored a lot of farmland.
A video called something like 'how sheep will save the world' is another good one about animal grazing and land restoration.
~'How wolves saved Yellowstone' is another on how reintroducing apex predators saved Yellowstone.
Elon actually saying something almost correct here.
There is no overpopulation by any sense of resources. We could easily feed, water, shelter with electricity twice the population if only money and politics were not preventing it. I'm not talking about eating soy and bugs either.
I hate woke culture, and have had beef with Netflix ever since they dropped their $1/DVD model and stole everyone's account balances, but I'd like to point out another element here.
Netflix laid off 150 employees because their revenue was only 7.87B instead of 7.93B. 0.75% ($60M) below target. And their value dropped $54B.
Publically traded companies are a terrible idea. The stock market is like usury 2.0.
Remember folks: 20% of accounts post 80% of the content.
Twitter can't verify more real accounts without incriminating themselves. They'll reveal fake accounts that were used nefariously, they'll reveal how they know an account is real... data they collected illegally... accounts of minors... who knows what they're hiding exactly, but it's for certain that twitter is not clean.
We haven't talked at all about spontaneous creation of organisms. So try harder at keeping your shit straight.
I've told you how you are wrong, and what mistakes you are making. I haven't simply said 'you don't know enough." I said that you don't understand evolution. That you should study how evolutionists teach evolution, so you can refute their actual claims and not just the strawman version of evolution that creationists have created.
Yes, I watched the video. Do you think any actor is committed enough to dive into asphalt, forehead first, without putting their arms up at all? Or are you saying that the whole thing is CGI?
So you've been hunting? Then you know there is not a pool of blood where the deer was standing when you shot it. That blood trails are drops and smears of blood, not buckets. You know that guy shots dont bleed much.
Unless someone was grazed on the neck, severing their jugular causing it to squirt blood directly out with every heart beat, I wouldn't expect to see any blood in the few seconds that we see each person in the video.
There's a million gore videos out there, you're more then welcome to compare...
I already have, thanks.
The theory of evolution is what I stated in my first comment. Beneficial genetic mutations over time. Survival of the fittest. A "non-fatal mutation" is a disadvantage. An inefficiency bodily process, a waste of calories that sort of thing. The original entity without the mutation would be at an advantage because it didnt waste energy.
It doesn't matter what you've already done, you need to do more because you dont understand.
'Survival of the fittest' is an inaccurate simplification of evolution. "Extinction of the weakest" would be more correct. You don't fail to pass your gene's along because you're not the best, you only fail if youre the worst and die before reproduction.
If only the strongest survived there would be no room for evolution and adaptation, and all genetics among a species would be homogenous. This is not the case.
You're setting a strawman and arguing against it, not against evolution as it is taught by evolutionists.
Ever get cut and look at the wound before it starts bleeding?
If you go deer hunting or watch some videos, you'll see how little of a blood trail, even a shot to the heart can leave.
The human heart pumps around a gallon of blood per minute. ( That's through the aorta, so each arterie in your arms/legs/etc will see less than that)
Once the heart had stopped, gravity is really the only forcing causing bleeding.
Shooter is likely using full metal jacket, not designed for maximum lethality like you would use for hunting. FMJ causes less damage and less bleeding, as the bullet does not fragment.
In short, blood doesn't work like in the movies.
You need to study evolution more, and not argue against the strawman non-evolutionists have set up.
Complexity is not a counterargument to evolution.
Go look up intermediary fossils on your own. It doesn't matter what you or I think they are, what matters is that you understand the theory you are arguing against.
Also, how would that intermediary from be a useful genetic advantage, anyways? A glider with bones stuck in it is just a shitty glider with extra weight and calories. Thats not an advantage.
It doesn't need to be an advantage, it just needs to be a non-fatal mutation.
Is each step in a staircase not fully formed?
Gliding comes before flying in every evolutionary model. You're just doing mental gymnastics.
I know exactly how complex single cells are, and what is involved in optics, but overall complexity has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Your argument is 100% wrong if anything less than the modern expression of wings and eyes is not a net-negative.
Your argument is circular. Everything you postulate hinges on your preformulated belief.
I'm not an evolutionist, but eyes and wings do not have to be fully developed to be useful.
Look at all the gliding reptiles, mammals, and marsupials. None of them have fully formed wings, yet find that the excess skin and supporting limbs very useful.
As for eyes, a single cell can be photoreceptive...
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_tierra_hueca.htm
That's Hollow earth, but there are other sections as well