2
Ozzie 2 points ago +2 / -0

I differ on this one. I don't believe that Trump has been assassinated and replaced. But I DO believe there are a bevy of Presidential Doubles a la Saddam, who go around and do certain appearances for him.

This explains why sometimes Trump's this natural off-the-cuff guy, and other times he seems very muted and sticking to the exact talking points.

Remember when he did that speech at the washing machine factory prior to the election, and he made a strange comment that due to his screwing over Big Pharma that "this may be the last time you see me for a while" and intimated that he had a lot of powerful enemies.

I believe that the Corona/Regeneron Trump was a double. I believe quite a few of them are doubles. They don't speak as naturally as the real Trump.

But I believe that Trump is insulated and entirely cognizant of the reality of using doubles in global warfare.

At this stage of the proceedings, it would be foolish NOT to have doubles.

I think that perhaps the actual Trump will re-emerge once things are clearer.

Perhaps the very reason that they never managed to assassinate Trump (something that was clearly on Pelosi's agenda, Pelosi who grew up in the mob boss political world of the Kennedys) was the fact that they knew if they did, a double would immediately emerge and assume the role. There would be no benefit in killing a man with doubles.

It's an interesting kind of insurance to protect the King.

3
Ozzie 3 points ago +3 / -0

I could rattle on for hours about the Paul thing. But yeah. That was the video I meant. Dude is not comfortable in his own skin, and clearly is there to deliver "an agenda".

When it comes to the Beatles, there is such a web of occultism that you could talk about any one aspect of it for hours on end.

But overall, it was part of the cultural shift to Satanism and Communism in the guise of "peace and love" delivered to a generation of children to separate them from their mass-traumatized post-war parents' generation.

The sheer psychological fragmentation done to society as a whole is mind-boggling.

6
Ozzie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those comments are based, by the way! It's good to see people wise to this.

The science of doubles has definitely progressed within the last few decades. They can create basically anything they want nowadays.

My biggest fascination is the process. Like, some feel like they were rush jobs. A panic-created double to appease public speculation. Others have more work put into them.

So many Hillaries circulated after the side of beef incident. I recall seeing a video of an ex-Clinton WH staffer even questioning the truth of Hillary well before that, noting that her eye color was inconsistent.

I feel like they hadn't anticipated Trumpian justice and that the 2016 Bill and Hillary actually were executed, or at least one set was.

The most interesting part is when they're fresh. Their first public performance.

For example, there's a 1967 interview which seems to be the first majorly rehearsed interview for the brand new Paul McCartney. But this was straight up CIA-style surgery and prosthetics, not the later Soviet cloning/robotoid techniques. So he's got some nervous tells. Sort of pulls at his ear and says "you know" at the end of most of his sentences.

It's fascinating from a societal/technological/ethical/spiritual perspective, but it's absolutely horrifying when you think of it.

We're basically in a world full of vampires and body snatchers.

3
Ozzie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, you're into the same realms of research. Assuming everything I've read about organic robotoids is true, I can imagine that it's implementation nowadays is much smoother than it was in the Jimmy Carter days, with advancements in biology and cloning research.

I'd go so far as to propose that the various Bills and Hillaries rotated around over the years were a series of organic robotoids themselves. There may have been real originals once, but I feel like any lust for power that is driven by Alinsky ideals would certainly put willing subjects into such a process (to gather the memory map).

Back onto Dave though, years ago there were videos everywhere claiming to be Dave's cousin who was saying he'd been replaced.

I believe there's video out there too of Jack Black saying that if you don't do what you're told, you're killed and replaced. I can't remember where I saw it.

So it's a pretty big incentive for people to stay locked in the horrific machine.

It's quite sick. What of the good-hearted? Do they argue with themselves that by actually going along with the plans they prevent an unchained replacement from doing even more evil?

I fail to see the real Dave Chapelle as an evil man. But this impostor... demon vibes.

18
Ozzie 18 points ago +18 / -0

Man, fuckers on here don't even want to confront the idea that Paul McCartney was replaced, let alone Dave Chapelle.

Dude is clearly not Dave. Different energy, different skin tone, height, build, vocal timbre, different sense of humour. And a really weird ass kissing of the DC "Elite" crowd.

Remember the fake publicity they drummed up for his Netflix special? Netflix are money sinks for the left of the left, including the Obamas and the pedo crowd. But they said that this lame-ass comedy special was "controversial!" just so people would tune in.

And what did they tune into? Fucking Impostor Dave who is a completely different man than the one who was exposing Hollywood, trying to condition the public into thinking that pedophilia is a good thing. That Obama and Kamala were these hip cool cats.

All I can say is RIP Dave Chapelle.

21
Ozzie 21 points ago +23 / -2

Dude nearly blows the secrets of Hollywood, calls the environment sick. Then the fake news media all calls him batshit crazy when he supposedly "fled to Africa". Then he comes back looking and sounding different, does a Netflix special where he tries to normalize Michael Jackson's pedophilia and at the end of that special he goes on about how he's such good friends with Obama and Kamala.

REPLACED.